On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 8:21 AM Mark Zhang via ruby-talk < ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
From the perspective of a developer, Homebrew is indeed very convenient. However, when I want to distribute Ruby-made games or GUI programs, I find it hard to imagine how to convince the other party to configure everything step by step without making mistakes.
This makes me feel that Brew is not good enough. Perhaps for those who just want to run Ruby, a dmg/pkg would be enough, just as Java and Python are doing.
If you want to distribute games or GUI apps written in Ruby, bundle Ruby with your app. Trusting that a user's Ruby installation is compatible with your game or app is foolishly risky. There are things about how Ruby works which makes that non-trivial (especially if the app is installed in ~/Applications instead of /Applications), but that's true of pretty much anything with dylibs. Python is a reasonable example of a language ecosystem that provides a package build, but it provides **far more** than just the framework (installed into /Library) and binaries (installed into /usr/local/bin), but also (importantly) IDLE.app (a Tk program). Ruby does not have something like IDLE, so it doesn't really need it. Java is an entirely different example, as what most people need is the JRE just to run the (very few remaining) Java Desktop programs (and some of those offer two downloads: with and without). Ruby doesn't **need** a .pkg installer. I suspect that if someone stepped up and volunteered to build it and maintain it (and ensure that the resulting packages are signed and all), there might be interest in it. Far more likely, there would be interest that you hosted (like https://rubyinstaller.org for Windows) and would link to it from ruby-lang.org. Simply complaining that Ruby doesn't have a pkg installer isn't useful, and comparing what Ruby does for this in comparison to other languages or runtimes doesn't help without understanding the contexts involved. -a
Ryan Davis via ruby-talk <ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> 于2024年5月28日周二 05:42写道：
On May 27, 2024, at 01:24, Mark Zhang via ruby-talk < ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
In contrast, installing Ruby requires a preliminary step of installing Homebrew, as directed on ruby-lang.org <https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/installation/#homebrew>. After Homebrew is set up, users must then add libraries and compile Ruby from the source code, which can be a daunting task for many.
Where do you see this? I see that it points out that you already have ruby, and suggests for a newer version to install homebrew and then running `brew install ruby`. No dependencies, no building from source.
______________________________________________ ruby-talk mailing list -- ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-talk-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-talk info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-talk.ml.ruby-lang.org...
______________________________________________ ruby-talk mailing list -- ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-talk-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-talk info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-talk.ml.ruby-lang.org...
-- Austin Ziegler • halostatue@gmail.com • austin@halostatue.ca http://www.halostatue.ca/ • http://twitter.com/halostatue