From the perspective of a developer, Homebrew is indeed very convenient. However, when I want to distribute Ruby-made games or GUI programs, I find it hard to imagine how to convince the other party to configure everything step by step without making mistakes. This makes me feel that Brew is not good enough. Perhaps for those who just want to run Ruby, a dmg/pkg would be enough, just as Java and Python are doing. Ryan Davis via ruby-talk <ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> 于2024年5月28日周二 05:42写道：
On May 27, 2024, at 01:24, Mark Zhang via ruby-talk < ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
In contrast, installing Ruby requires a preliminary step of installing Homebrew, as directed on ruby-lang.org <https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/installation/#homebrew>. After Homebrew is set up, users must then add libraries and compile Ruby from the source code, which can be a daunting task for many.
Where do you see this? I see that it points out that you already have ruby, and suggests for a newer version to install homebrew and then running `brew install ruby`. No dependencies, no building from source.
______________________________________________ ruby-talk mailing list -- ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-talk-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-talk info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-talk.ml.ruby-lang.org...