I also did run into this kind of problems in a legacy project. I turned out, generating the xml was not the problem. The problem was getting the data. On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 8:57 PM ara.t.howard via ruby-talk <ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
as someone that has written way too many ruby DSLs i would say use ERB. it's easy to read for non-ruby experts, fast, built-in, and has good editor support. can't really do better than that....
-- - a "be kind whenever possible. it is always possible." -- h.h. the 14th dalai lama
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 00:25, Peter Hickman via ruby-talk <ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
I'm profiling some code to try and squeeze out performance. It takes a user query, reads data from the database and returned the result as XML
I have tuned the code and database (checking the indexes, caching repeated calls etc) and what I am left with is that 95% of the call's runtime is building the XML. We are using builder because it is the standard / default for Ruby
Using Ruby 3.0.2p107 as it is the default for Ubuntu 22.04
Is there another, faster library for XML generation or will I be building this by hand?
Any suggestions
______________________________________________ ruby-talk mailing list -- ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-talk-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-talk info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-talk.ml.ruby-lang.org...
______________________________________________ ruby-talk mailing list -- ruby-talk@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-talk-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-talk info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-talk.ml.ruby-lang.org...