Issue #19985 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev).
That's not funny, it's expected, as load deals exclusively with paths, and require does not generally deal with paths.
Yeah, makes sense.
But in general, require does not deal with paths. I don't think we should add Pathname support to require.
Makes sense. Then, probably, it is up to RubyGems to remove this false conversion. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19985: Support `Pathname` for `require` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19985#change-105147 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- It seems that RubyGems / Bundler `require` method overrides of accept `Pathname` as and argument ~~~ $ ruby -rpathname -e ' pa = Pathname.new("test") require pa ' <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- test (LoadError) from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require' from -e:3:in `<main>' ~~~ while plain Ruby require does not: ~~~ $ ruby --disable-gems -rpathname -e ' pa = Pathname.new("test") require pa ' -e:3:in `require': no implicit conversion of Pathname into String (TypeError) from -e:3:in `<main>' ~~~ This inconsistency is surprising. It seems that RubyGems / Bundler developers think [1] that Ruby `require` should also accept `Pathname`. ~~~ $ ruby -v ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-linux] ~~~ [1]: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/7128 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/