Issue #21035 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). This ticket was discussed briefly at the dev meeting. fxn (Xavier Noria) wrote in #note-3:
Let me give you a generic example that does not fire an autoload:
``` ruby # main.rb require 'foo'
# foo.rb require 'm'
# m.rb module M autoload :Foo, 'foo'
p constants p const_defined?(:Foo) p autoload?(:Foo) end ```
This case was in a circular require pattern, which is unrecommended, so that it was not considered worth discussing anything based on this case. Instead of arguing whether the current behavior is "intuitive" or not, it would be more constructive to explain shortly what you are trying to do and how the current behavior is troubling for that purpose, by using a short example code. ---------------------------------------- Misc #21035: Clarify or redefine Module#autoload? and Module#const_defined? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21035#change-111884 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- The documentation for `Module#autoload?` says:
Returns filename to be loaded if name is registered as autoload in the namespace of mod or one of its ancestors.
As a user, if I declare an autoload, I expect this API: ```ruby module M autoload :Foo, 'foo' constants # => [:Foo] const_defined?(:Foo) # => true autoload?(:Foo) # => 'foo' end ``` That it is indeed how it generally works. Even if the autoload path does not exist. But there is an edge case. While `constants` does include always `:Foo` as far as I can tell, the return value of `const_defined?` and `autoload?` depends on the stack of features being loaded: The autoload path is resolved and if seen to be in the stack of features being loaded, the predicates return `false` and `nil`, respectively. Do you think that is intuitive? I find that logic totally unexpected. I just defined an autoload, therefore, I think it would be natural for `autoload?` to return what I just configured. Why should `const_defined?` return nothing but `true`? And why is it not consistent with `constants`? To me, it would make more sense that in the previous example `const_defined?` returns `true`, and `autoload?` returns `foo` unconditionally (and instantly, nowadays it takes a relative long time due to the lookup). Now, if the autoload is triggered in a lookup **then** I would expect `Kernel#require` logic to apply. But not when calling some simple predicates. Please, note that the present behavior is not documented, so on paper the change would not be backwards incompatible. If, on the other side, it is preferred to keep the behavior as it is, I guess it should be documented with precision (accounting for symlinks, relative paths in `$LOAD_PATH`, etc.) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/