Issue #20425 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada). My idea is simple because it is simple replacement with an array (and a hash) to contain arguments (I only proposed lightweight argument container than an array and hash). This proposal breaks the assumption of VM stack structure. I'm afraid this kind of breakage can cause serious issue. But I can misunderstand so let's talk at RubyKaigi, Okinawa with a whiteboard. ---------------------------------------- Feature #20425: Optimize forwarding callers and callees https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20425#change-107996 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- [This PR](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/10510) optimizes forwarding callers and callees. It only optimizes methods that only take `...` as their parameter, and then pass `...` to other calls. Calls it optimizes look like this: ```ruby def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(...) # optimized foo(123) ``` ```ruby def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(1, 2, ...) # optimized foo(123) ``` ```ruby def bar(*a) = a def foo(...) list = [1, 2] bar(*list, ...) # optimized end foo(123) ``` All variants of the above but using `super` are also optimized, including a bare super like this: ```ruby def foo(...) super end ``` This patch eliminates intermediate allocations made when calling methods that accept `...`. We can observe allocation elimination like this: ```ruby def m x = GC.stat(:total_allocated_objects) yield GC.stat(:total_allocated_objects) - x end def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(...) def test m { foo(123) } end test p test # allocates 1 object on master, but 0 objects with this patch ``` ```ruby def bar(a, b:) = a + b def foo(...) = bar(...) def test m { foo(1, b: 2) } end test p test # allocates 2 objects on master, but 0 objects with this patch ``` ## How does it work? This patch works by using a dynamic stack size when passing forwarded parameters to callees. The caller's info object (known as the "CI") contains the stack size of the parameters, so we pass the CI object itself as a parameter to the callee. When forwarding parameters, the forwarding ISeq uses the caller's CI to determine how much stack to copy, then copies the caller's stack before calling the callee. The CI at the forwarded call site is adjusted using information from the caller's CI. I think this description is kind of confusing, so let's walk through an example with code. ```ruby def delegatee(a, b) = a + b def delegator(...) delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) end def caller delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) end ``` Before we call the delegator method, the stack looks like this: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 4| # | 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | 6| end | 7| | 8| def caller | -> 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 10| end | ``` The ISeq for `delegator` is tagged as "forwardable", so when `caller` calls in to `delegator`, it writes `CI1` on to the stack as a local variable for the `delegator` method. The `delegator` method has a special local called `...` that holds the caller's CI object. Here is the ISeq disasm fo `delegator`: ``` == disasm: #<ISeq:delegator@-e:1 (1,0)-(1,39)> local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) [ 1] "..."@0 0000 putself ( 1)[LiCa] 0001 getlocal_WC_0 "..."@0 0003 send <calldata!mid:delegatee, argc:0, FCALL|FORWARDING>, nil 0006 leave [Re] ``` The local called `...` will contain the caller's CI: CI1. Here is the stack when we enter `delegator`: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 -> 4| # | CI1 (argc: 2) 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | cref_or_me 6| end | specval 7| | type 8| def caller | 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 10| end | ``` The CI at `delegatee` on line 5 is tagged as "FORWARDING", so it knows to memcopy the caller's stack before calling `delegatee`. In this case, it will memcopy self, 1, and 2 to the stack before calling `delegatee`. It knows how much memory to copy from the caller because `CI1` contains stack size information (argc: 2). Before executing the `send` instruction, we push `...` on the stack. The `send` instruction pops `...`, and because it is tagged with `FORWARDING`, it knows to memcopy (using the information in the CI it just popped): ``` == disasm: #<ISeq:delegator@-e:1 (1,0)-(1,39)> local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) [ 1] "..."@0 0000 putself ( 1)[LiCa] 0001 getlocal_WC_0 "..."@0 0003 send <calldata!mid:delegatee, argc:0, FCALL|FORWARDING>, nil 0006 leave [Re] ``` Instruction 001 puts the caller's CI on the stack. `send` is tagged with FORWARDING, so it reads the CI and _copies_ the callers stack to this stack: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 4| # | CI1 (argc: 2) -> 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | cref_or_me 6| end | specval 7| | type 8| def caller | self 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 1 10| end | 2 ``` The "FORWARDING" call site combines information from CI1 with CI2 in order to support passing other values in addition to the `...` value, as well as perfectly forward splat args, kwargs, etc. Since we're able to copy the stack from `caller` in to `delegator`'s stack, we can avoid allocating objects. ## Why? I want to do this to eliminate object allocations for delegate methods. My long term goal is to implement `Class#new` in Ruby and it uses `...`. I was able to implement `Class#new` in Ruby [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/9289). If we adopt the technique in this patch, then we can optimize allocating objects that take keyword parameters for `initialize`. For example, this code will allocate 2 objects: one for `SomeObject`, and one for the kwargs: ```ruby SomeObject.new(foo: 1) ``` If we combine this technique, plus implement `Class#new` in Ruby, then we can reduce allocations for this common operation. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/