Issue #19300 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev). @Eregon
My tip is never trust the docs regarding what method is where
Thanks, as a person that tries to maintain and update the docs for each version, I am well aware of it. The initial ticket text also mentions this:
But, in the description above, according to documentation is important statement. Because according to introspection, method definitions are spread differently
So it's an issue of RDoc.
Well, I wouln't say it is an issue: it is a [deliberate decision](https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/blob/017bb9fa496ee0e0959facba694a053008d1ecb0/l...): Treat all public methods of `Kernel` as if they belong to `Object`. Which seems to be handling that old discrepancy of "what is implied" (`Kernel` is for private methods that pretend to be "global", `Object` is for public methods, common for each object) and "how it is implemented" (all methods are belonging to Kernel). Actually, the three problematic methods got to `Kernel`s docs (skipping this RDoc trick) when they were extracted into [`kernel.rb`](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/kernel.rb). Oh, and looking closer, the same problem is related to `#class` and `#frozen?`. If we'll look at [2.7 Kernel docs](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/Kernel.html) (before `kernel.rb` was introduced), everything was fine and public `Object` methods belonged to `Object` in docs. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19300: Move public objects from Kernel to Object https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19300#change-100965 * Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev) * Status: Third Party's Issue * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- In my understanding, `Kernel` is a container for methods that are perceived as "global", and are available inside every objects as its private methods, like `puts` ```ruby class A def foo = puts "foo" end a = A.new a.foo # prints "foo" a.puts 'bar' # private method `puts' called for #<A:0x00007f39a683db28> (NoMethodError) ``` There are, though, exactly three (if I am not missing something) methods that, **according to documentation**, break this intuition and belong to [Kernel](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/Kernel.html): * `clone` * `tap` * `then` All those methods are public method for a receiver, and they mostly make sense with an explicit receiver. The most confusing of them is `#clone`, which is close cousin of `#dup`, but it is [Kernel#clone](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/Kernel.html#method-i-clone) and [Object#dup](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/Object.html#method-i-dup). This state of things is mostly harmless in practical code, but very inconvenient for teaching, reasoning about the meaning of modules and objects, and lookup for documentation. **But**, in the description above, **according to documentation** is important statement. Because according to introspection, method definitions are spread differently: ```ruby puts "Public" Object.new .then { |o| o.methods.group_by { o.method(_1).owner } } .each { puts "#{_1}: #{_2.sort.join(', ')}" } puts puts "Private:" Object.new .then { |o| o.private_methods.group_by { o.method(_1).owner } } .each { puts "#{_1}: #{_2.sort.join(', ')}" } ``` Output: ``` Public Kernel: !~, <=>, ===, class, clone, define_singleton_method, display, dup, enum_for, eql?, extend, freeze, frozen?, hash, inspect, instance_of?, instance_variable_defined?, instance_variable_get, instance_variable_set, instance_variables, is_a?, itself, kind_of?, method, methods, nil?, object_id, private_methods, protected_methods, public_method, public_methods, public_send, remove_instance_variable, respond_to?, send, singleton_class, singleton_method, singleton_methods, tap, then, to_enum, to_s, yield_self BasicObject: !, !=, ==, __id__, __send__, equal?, instance_eval, instance_exec Private: Kernel: Array, Complex, Float, Hash, Integer, Rational, String, __callee__, __dir__, __method__, `, abort, at_exit, autoload, autoload?, binding, block_given?, caller, caller_locations, catch, eval, exec, exit, exit!, fail, fork, format, gem, gem_original_require, gets, global_variables, initialize_clone, initialize_copy, initialize_dup, iterator?, lambda, load, local_variables, loop, open, p, pp, print, printf, proc, putc, puts, raise, rand, readline, readlines, require, require_relative, respond_to_missing?, select, set_trace_func, sleep, spawn, sprintf, srand, syscall, system, test, throw, trace_var, trap, untrace_var, warn BasicObject: initialize, method_missing, singleton_method_added, singleton_method_removed, singleton_method_undefined ``` E.g., internally, `Object` doesn't have _any_ method defined, and is just a `BasicObject` with `Kernel` included. So, there are three questions/proposals: 1. Does this disposition has some internal sense, or it is more of a historical thing? 2. Can it be changed so that public methods belonged to `Object` instead of `Kernel`? 3. If the answer to (2) is "no", can at least docs for `clone`, `tap` and `then` be adjusted to follow other public methods in pretending they are `Object`'s features? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/