
4 May
2024
4 May
'24
9:49 a.m.
Issue #20468 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Assignee deleted (matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)) I found that a `for` loop variable is looser than I expected. Not only a safe navigation call, even a constant can be used. I don't think a constant is useful as a loop variable that is expected to be re-assigned. https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/10723 ---------------------------------------- Bug #20468: Segfault on safe navigation in for target https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20468#change-108178 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby for foo&.bar in []; end ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/