Issue #21669 has been updated by Earlopain (Earlopain _). Yeah, sure. I compiled them in this gist: https://gist.github.com/Earlopain/79d49df05cca5b0c8c6cefc6f3284a4b. I missed one vendored file, so there are only 6 distinct cases. In `ruby/prism` I added a script for this. You call it like `bin/compare main void-value-expression ~/all-of-rubygems/` where the first two args are git references you want to compare against and the 3rd is the folder with all the code. At the moment it generates a rather ugly report that doesn't tell you too much about what actually changed except the bare minimum (valid previously -> now invalid, etc.), so for now I manually look at the files for more details. I want to improve that in the future. ---------------------------------------- Bug #21669: Thoroughly implement void value expression check https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21669#change-115657 * Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Status: Open * Assignee: prism * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- A void-value-expression check is a syntax check that raises a `SyntaxError` if an expression that cannot grammatically return a value (a "void value expression," such as a `return` expression) appears in a context where a value is expected (e.g., the right-hand side of an assignment, the argument of a method call, etc.). A typical example rejected by this check is `x = return`. However, it has become clear that this check is incomplete. This ticket summarizes the results of a discussion with @matz at the hackathon before RubyWorld Conference today. ## 1\. Expressions containing branches @matz said that an expression containing branches should be considered a void value expression only if it can be grammatically determined that all possible branches do not return a value. Based on this, both parse.y and prism currently reject the following code with a "void value expression" `SyntaxError`, but it should be accepted: ```ruby x = begin raise return rescue "OK" else return end # Expected: Code parses and executes successfully. # Actual: Rejected with "unexpected void value expression" SyntaxError. ``` Reason: The `rescue` clause can return a value ("OK"), so the entire `begin` expression is not void. Conversely, the following code is currently accepted by both parse.y and prism, but it should be rejected: ```ruby x = begin foo rescue return else return end # Expected: Rejected with SyntaxError. # Actual: Code parses and executes. ``` Reason: This expression always does `return`, so it is void whether `foo` raises an exception or not. Furthermore, `case` expressions must also be rejected similarly when all branches are void: ```ruby x = case when 1; return when 2; return else return end # Expected: Rejected with SyntaxError. # Actual: Code parses and executes. ``` Note that `if` expressions appear to be implemented correctly as intended: ```ruby x = if rand < 0.5 return else return end # Expected: Rejected with SyntaxError. # Actual: Rejected. (OK!) ``` ## 2\. Statement lists containing a void value expression @matz also said that if a statements node contains a void value expression, the entire statement list should be treated as a void value expression, even if the void expression is not the last one. Therefore, the following code is currently accepted but should be rejected: ```ruby x = begin return "NG" end # Expected: Rejected with SyntaxError. # Actual: Code parses and executes. ``` The same applies to branches within other expressions: ```ruby x = if rand < 0.5 return "NG" else return end # Expected: Rejected with SyntaxError. # Actual: Code parses and executes. ``` Note that if a return statement is inside a branch, that statement cannot be considered a void value expression, so the entire expression also cannot be a void value expression. ```ruby x = begin return if true "NG" end # Expected: Code parses and executes. # Actual: Code parses and executes as expected. (OK!) ``` --- This is considered a bug, but if it causes practical compatibility issues, it may be necessary to plan a migration path or revisit the specifications. (Both prism and parse.y need to be fixed, but I'll assign it to the prism team for now.) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/