Issue #19261 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev).
But Data randomly lacking some shorthand methods that exist for Struct would make such refactoring harder.
Yes, that was the only reason I preserved the method in `Data`. Don't recall using it myself, but don't see harm in its existence either. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19261: `Data#members` is not important https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19261#change-101179 * Author: ko1 (Koichi Sasada) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- `Data#members` is defined but it is calculated by `self.class.members` (in other words, `#members` is a shorthand for `self.class.members`). So it is better to remove this method. ```ruby P = Data.define(:x, :y) p P.new(1, 2).members #=> [:x, :y] Group = Data.define(:name, :members) gs = Group.new('SasadaFamily', %w(ko1 yuki)) p gs.members #=> ["ko1", "yuki"] ``` ---Files-------------------------------- data-members-remove-method.patch (1.87 KB) data-and-struct-remove-members-method.patch (3.5 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/