Issue #20570 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun). I _think_ I managed to fix the conflict. I'd appreciate a backport PR next time though. ---------------------------------------- Bug #20570: Nokey behavior changed since 3.3. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20570#change-109030 * Author: ksss (Yuki Kurihara) * Status: Closed * Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada) * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.2 (2024-05-30 revision e5a195edf6) [arm64-darwin22] * Backport: 3.1: DONTNEED, 3.2: DONTNEED, 3.3: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I am using code that transfers the following method call, but found that the behavior has changed since CRuby 3.3. ```ruby receiver_value = Set.new method_name = :merge args = [1] kwargs = {} block = nil receiver_value.__send__(method_name, *args, **kwargs, &block) # => no keywords accepted (ArgumentError) ``` Upon investigation, I found that the behavior of calling a method using `**nil` has changed starting from version 3.3. ``` $ docker run -it --rm rubylang/all-ruby env ALL_RUBY_SINCE=ruby-2.6 ./all-ruby -e 'def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{})' WARNING: The requested image's platform (linux/amd64) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm64/v8) and no specific platform was requested ruby-2.6.0 -e:1: syntax error, unexpected nil, expecting ')' def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^~~ exit 1 ... ruby-2.6.10 -e:1: syntax error, unexpected nil, expecting ')' def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^~~ exit 1 ruby-2.7.0-preview1 -e:1: syntax error, unexpected `nil', expecting ')' def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^~~ exit 1 ruby-2.7.0-preview2 nil ... ruby-3.2.4 nil ruby-3.3.0-preview1 -e:1:in `<main>': no keywords accepted (ArgumentError) def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^^^^^^^^^ exit 1 ... ruby-3.3.2 -e:1:in `<main>': no keywords accepted (ArgumentError) def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^^^^^^^^^ exit 1 ruby-3.4.0-preview1 -e:1:in '<main>': no keywords accepted (ArgumentError) def foo(*, **nil); end; p foo(*[], **{}) ^^^^^^^^^ exit 1 ``` Is this change intentional? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/