Issue #20770 has been updated by AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro). jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-10:
We could expand the syntax to treat `.{}` as `.then{}`, similar to how `.()` is `.call()`. With that, you could do:
```ruby client_api_url .{ URI.parse(it) } .{ Net::HTTP.get(it) } .{ JSON.parse(it).fetch(important_key) } ```
Which is almost as low of a syntatic overhead as you would want.
Note that we are still in a syntax moratorium, so it's probably better to wait until after that is over and we have crowned the one true parser before seriously considering new syntax.
The idea of using `.{}` is really creative, but it feels somewhat unintuitive. On the other hand, the pipe operator is a well-established concept, which would ease adoption. ---------------------------------------- Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20770#change-109983 * Author: AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Hello, This is my first contribution here. I have seen previous discussions around introducing a pipe operator, but it seems the community didn't reach a consensus. I would like to revisit this idea with a simpler approach, more of a syntactic sugar that aligns with how other languages implement the pipe operator, but without making significant changes to Ruby's syntax. Currently, we often write code like this: ```ruby value = half(square(add(value, 3))) ``` We can achieve the same result using the `then` method: ```ruby value = value.then { add(_1, 3) }.then { square(_1) }.then { half(_1) } ``` While `then` helps with readability, we can simplify it further using the proposed pipe operator: ```ruby value = add(value, 3) |> square(_1) |> half(_1) ``` Moreover, with the upcoming `it` feature in Ruby 3.4 (#18980), the code could look even cleaner: ```ruby value = add(value, 3) |> square(it) |> half(it) ``` This proposal uses the anonymous block argument `(_1)`, and with `it`, it simplifies the code without introducing complex syntax changes. It would allow us to achieve the same results as in other languages that support pipe operators, but in a way that feels natural to Ruby, using existing constructs like `then` underneath. I believe this operator would enhance code readability and maintainability, especially in cases where multiple operations are chained together. Thank you for considering this proposal! -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/