Issue #20639 has been updated by znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA). They hosted on S3 directly (URLs can be deduced from the workflow file), but they are not for public now. I agree to serve them on docs.ruby-lang.org. We want to consider their URL before serving. Current paths are: * `/en/VERSION/` for rdoc * `/ja/VERSION/` for rurema * `/ja/search/` for rurema-search What path is good for documents generated by Doxygen? ---------------------------------------- Misc #20639: Request to host C API docs on docs.ruby-lang.org https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20639#change-109148 * Author: alanwu (Alan Wu) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Having a first-party documentation site benefits readers and helps contributors improve the contents. The Ruby standard library API benefits from being hosted on <https://docs.ruby-lang.org> and it would be nice if the C API documentation produced by Doxygen can be hosted on the same site as well. I'm not familiar with the logistics of hosting the documentation site, and traffic is not free. But I think this is worth considering for the benefit of Ruby extension authors and maintainers. At the moment, <https://github.com/ruby/actions> generates the documentation with Doxygen but it's not hosted anywhere as far as I can tell. Searching for "Ruby C API documentation" on Google lead to guides about the API and no results that provide a comprehensive up-to-date reference. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/