
Issue #19520 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme). Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote in #note-39:
Why not `#<MyTemplate:0x000055e017895038 @path="path/to/file">` for an instance of MyTemplate and so no anonymous classes?
Because we want to compile the template to ruby once per process, and then use an instance for rendering: ```ruby tplclass = MyTemplate["path/to/file"] #create class and compile 'render' method (if not already done) str = tplclass.new.render(**locals) ``` This is a pretty common pattern for template engines. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19520: Support for `Module.new(name)` and `Class.new(superclass, name)`. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19520#change-102947 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- See <https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19450> for previous discussion and motivation. [This proposal](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7376) introduces the `name` parameter to `Class.new` and `Module.new`: ```ruby Class.new(superclass, name) Module.new(name) ``` As a slight change, we could use keyword arguments instead. ## Example usage The current Ruby test suite has code which shows the usefulness of this new method: ```ruby def labeled_module(name, &block) Module.new do singleton_class.class_eval { define_method(:to_s) {name} alias inspect to_s alias name to_s } class_eval(&block) if block end end module_function :labeled_module def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block) Class.new(superclass) do singleton_class.class_eval { define_method(:to_s) {name} alias inspect to_s alias name to_s } class_eval(&block) if block end end module_function :labeled_class ``` The updated code would look like this: ```ruby def labeled_module(name, &block) Module.new(name, &block) end def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block) Class.new(superclass, name, &block) end module_function :labeled_class ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/