Issue #19912 has been reported by rubyFeedback (robert heiler). ---------------------------------------- Misc #19912: [Small potential for slight improvement in regards to trailing / that were omitted in a regex] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19912 * Author: rubyFeedback (robert heiler) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Not sure if I should file this under bug or not; it is probably not a bug per se and just the current behaviour. So I filed it under Misc here. So let me copy/paste the code next: alias e puts i = 'abc' case i when /help e 'No help options are currently documented.' when /-?-?rotate=(\d+)$/i pp $1.to_s exit end end I isolated this from a larger .rb file. I was adding support for --rotate= for a class tasked with commandline stuff in regards to .pdf files, e. g. rotating wrong .pdf files. When I run this .rb file, that is the one I showed above, I get the following error, as-is (the extra "end" is kind of deliberate, I had a much larger case/when structure before). foo.rb: --> foo.rb Unmatched `end', missing keyword (`do', `def`, `if`, etc.) ? > 4 i = 'abc' > 6 case i > 7 when /help > 8 e 'No help options are currently documented.' > 9 when /-?-?rotate=(\d+)$/i > 12 end > 14 end foo.rb:9: syntax error, unexpected backslash (SyntaxError) when /-?-?rotate=(\d+)$/i ^ Because there are at the least two problems in this .rb file, it appears to be that the ruby parser focuses on the last error found. To those who can not instantly find the error, I simply forgot a trailing / in the case/when menu, at "when /help". That actually was the real bug too. But I first looked down, where ruby alerted me that there is an issue with "when /-?-?rotate=(\d+)$/i". The real problem was the missing "/". Is there potential to improve handling of such small mistakes, specifically someone forgetting a trailing / in a case/when menu? I assume ruby has to decide what is going on, but usually when I use a case/when menu, I have multiple such entries, so perhaps this gives the ruby parser additional information it could use, such as: "look at the immediate surrounding and then determine whether this may be a missing /". I don't know how difficult it is to add that, and if it is too much work then I think the time may be spent elsewhere. But on the other hand, if the ruby parser could detect such small mistakes more easily (a forgotten /), this would be rather nice to have. This may also have to do with how ruby reports errors; I guess the part "Unmatched `end', missing keyword (`do', `def`, `if`, etc.) ?" is ruby's attempt to give useful information to the user, and in many cases this should work. But in case of simple errors such as the above it may not work, and secondary errors may disguise or confuse the user momentarily. I usually look at the last part of any long trace shown by the ruby parser to me, so that is why I sometimes miss prior errors. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/