Issue #19363 has been updated by wanabe (_ wanabe). File segv.log added I made a short reproduction code. There are three points: - unexpected negative lineno for eval (or for class_eval) - Coverage.start with `lines: true, eval: true` - GC verification ``` require "coverage" Coverage.start(lines: true, eval: true) eval(<<~EOS, binding, "", -1) Kernel.module_eval do def bar(locals) bar = locals[:bar] end end EOS bar({}) GC.verify_compaction_references ``` And I attached SEGV log on ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-03-26T06:23:11Z master 2f916812a9) [x86_64-linux] + WSL2. ---------------------------------------- Bug #19363: Fix rb_transient_heap_mark: wrong header (T_STRUCT) segfault https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19363#change-102554 * Author: bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) +YJIT [arm64-darwin22.2.0] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ## Overview Hello. 👋 I'm hitting an issue where my build is constantly failing with a segfault. The following is a snippet taken from my local machine with YJIT enabled (see attachments for details): ``` /Users/bkuhlmann/.cache/frum/versions/3.2.0/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puma-6.0.2/lib/puma/runner.rb: [BUG] rb_transient_heap_mark: wrong header, T_STRUCT (0x0000000109ea98a0) ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) +YJIT [arm64-darwin22.2.0] ``` The closest issue I could find that might be related to this issue (but not sure) is this issue: #15358. ## Steps to Recreate You should be able to quickly recreate this issue via these steps: - Download/clone my [Hemo](https://github.com/bkuhlmann/hemo) project. - Run the setup steps. - Run the test suite by running `bin/rspec`. If you need an example of the same segfault (but not on my macOS machine), you can see the same segfault via my [Circle CI Build](https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/bkuhlmann/hemo/11/workflows/f19abf...). My Circle CI build is using my [Docker Alpine Linux Ruby](https://www.alchemists.io/projects/docker-alpine-ruby) image which might be of interest as well. This Docker image is also built with YJIT enabled. Interestingly, is if you were to run the test suite with `bin/guard` instead of `bin/rspec` then the segfault doesn't occur. ## Environment ``` ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) +YJIT [arm64-darwin22.2.0] 1.43.0 (using Parser 3.2.0.0, rubocop-ast 1.24.1, running on ruby 3.2.0) [arm64-darwin22.2.0] - rubocop-performance 1.15.2 - rubocop-rake 0.6.0 - rubocop-rspec 2.18.1 - rubocop-sequel 0.3.4 - rubocop-thread_safety 0.4.4 ``` ---Files-------------------------------- segfault.txt (237 KB) ruby-2023-01-21-113841.ips (19.6 KB) segv.log (14.7 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/