Issue #21541 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). @MSP-Greg Could you make a PR adding a CI job to ruby/ruby that `make install` + run that [cli_test.rb](https://github.com/ruby/ruby-dev-builder/blob/master/cli_test.rb), like in https://github.com/ruby/ruby-dev-builder/actions/runs/16946820401/job/480298... ? Then we should catch these issues directly in ruby/ruby which is better. There is maybe/probably already a CI workflow doing `make install`, in that case just alter that one to run that extra test. I think it should be generally agreed that executables shipped with Ruby should work and are worth checking in CI. Maybe that test could even be part of ruby/spec (and potentially skipped if not `make install`-ed if that's a problem), but doesn't have to be. Could also be part of test-all under test/ruby or so. FWIW we already have a similar test in truffleruby: https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/blob/6e50bca7441b728207c2fb2bfaa51ae93... ---------------------------------------- Bug #21541: make install is failing due to using rdoc repo https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21541#change-114266 * Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L) * Status: Open * ruby -v: master * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Currently, ruby-dev-builder & ruby-loco are failing due to https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/8f6f9e88c70bbae, which changed the rdoc 'bundled gem' install from using a released gem to the repo. This results in an invalid rdoc installation. RDoc contains *.ry and *.kpeg source files that need to be 'compiled' into *.rb files with racc and kpeg. These *.rb files are not contained in the rdoc repo. One possible change would be to have rdoc include the compiled *.rb files in its repo. Puma has a similar issue with ragel files. A GHA workflow (https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/.github/workflows/ragel.yml) checks that the compiled *.c file matches its respective *.rl source file. Otherwise, a bit of code would be required in Ruby (and install of kpeg), or, rdoc must be installed from a released gem. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Issue #21541 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L). @Eregon, I'll look at adding a CLI check to CI. ---------------------------------------- Bug #21541: make install is failing due to using rdoc repo https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21541#change-114268 * Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L) * Status: Open * ruby -v: master * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Currently, ruby-dev-builder & ruby-loco are failing due to https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/8f6f9e88c70bbae, which changed the rdoc 'bundled gem' install from using a released gem to the repo. This results in an invalid rdoc installation. RDoc contains *.ry and *.kpeg source files that need to be 'compiled' into *.rb files with racc and kpeg. These *.rb files are not contained in the rdoc repo. One possible change would be to have rdoc include the compiled *.rb files in its repo. Puma has a similar issue with ragel files. A GHA workflow (https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/.github/workflows/ragel.yml) checks that the compiled *.c file matches its respective *.rl source file. Otherwise, a bit of code would be required in Ruby (and install of kpeg), or, rdoc must be installed from a released gem. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/