Issue #15980 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). Fixed in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/18122 ---------------------------------------- Bug #15980: Coverage shows while/until after raise if/unless as uncovered line https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15980#change-118287 * Author: jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) * Status: Closed * Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * ruby -v: ruby 2.7.0dev (2019-07-03) [x86_64-openbsd6.5] * Backport: 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: DONE ---------------------------------------- The following code shows line 2 (`while true`) as uncovered: ```ruby raise if 1 == 2 while true break end ``` Coverage reports the following for this file: `[1, 0, 1, nil]`. Note that `true` isn't important, any `while` condition will work. However, if you change line 1 to `raise if false`, line 1 shows `nil` coverage, and line 2 shows as covered (`[nil, 1, 1, nil]`). That leads me to believe this issue is related to the optimizer. I bisected this to commit:100bf2757468439106775a7d95a791a8c10b874a, which certainly appears related. This is not a theoretical case, it affected three lines in Sequel. While not a major problem, I do think a fix should be backported to 2.6. Note that this only affects line coverage. Branch coverage shows: ```ruby {"file.rb"=> {:branches=> {[:if, 0, 1, 0, 1, 15]=> {[:then, 1, 1, 0, 1, 5]=>0, [:else, 2, 1, 0, 1, 15]=>1}, [:while, 3, 2, 0, 4, 3]=>{[:body, 4, 3, 2, 3, 7]=>1}}}} ``` If you run with both branch and line coverage, line coverage shows correctly. This affects `while`/`until` after a line with `raise ... if ...` or `raise ... unless ...`. If you switch to `if ...; raise ...; end`, then line coverage shows correctly. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/