Issue #21830 has been updated by fxn (Xavier Noria). If you enable Ruby::Box, decorations to `Kernel#require` do not work. For example, given _foo.rb_: ```ruby module M def require(_path) puts 'decorated' super end end Kernel.prepend(M) p require 'tsort' ``` the decoration works normally: ``` % ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] decorated true ``` but the same code does not work with the feature enabled: ``` % RUBY_BOX=1 ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] ruby: warning: Ruby::Box is experimental, and the behavior may change in the future! See https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/4.0/Ruby/Box.html for known issues, etc. true ``` With this, Zeitwerk cannot work because it totally depends on a decoration of `Kernel#require` (done [here](https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk/blob/main/lib/zeitwerk/core_ext/kernel.rb)). Bootsnap also depends on the ability of decorating `Kernel#require` (done [here](https://github.com/rails/bootsnap/blob/main/lib/bootsnap/load_path_cache/cor...)). On one hand, these gems are walking a fine line in the border of the public interface of Ruby. On the other hand, it is a goal of boxes to be transparent to the code being loaded under them. @tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori) what should be the way to go in your opinion? /cc @byroot (Jean Boussier) ---------------------------------------- Bug #21830: Ruby::Box and Kernel#require https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21830#change-116012 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- If you enable `Ruby::Box`, decorations to `Kernel#require` do not work. For example, given `foo.rb`: ```ruby # foo.rb % cat foo.rb module M def require(_path) puts "decorated" super end end Kernel.prepend(M) require 'tsort' ``` the decoration works normally: ``` % ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] decorated ``` and the same code does not work with the feature enabled: ``` % RUBY_BOX=1 ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] ruby: warning: Ruby::Box is experimental, and the behavior may change in the future! See https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/4.0/Ruby/Box.html for known issues, etc. ``` With this, Zeitwerk cannot work because it totally depends on `Kernel#require` decoration (done [here](https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk/blob/main/lib/zeitwerk/core_ext/kernel.rb)). Bootsnap also depends on the ability of decorating `Kernel#require` (done [here](https://github.com/rails/bootsnap/blob/main/lib/bootsnap/load_path_cache/cor...)). On one hand, these gems are walking a fine line in the border of the public interface of Ruby. On the other hand, it is a goal of boxes to be transparent to the code being loaded under them. @tagomoris what should be the way to go in your opinion? /cc @byroot -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Issue #21830 has been updated by tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori). Assignee set to tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori) ---------------------------------------- Bug #21830: Ruby::Box and Kernel#require https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21830#change-116024 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Open * Assignee: tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori) * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- If you enable `Ruby::Box`, decorations to `Kernel#require` do not work. For example, given _foo.rb_: ```ruby module M def require(_path) puts 'decorated' super end end Kernel.prepend(M) p require 'tsort' ``` the decoration works normally: ``` % ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] decorated true ``` but it does not with the feature enabled: ``` % RUBY_BOX=1 ruby -v foo.rb ruby 4.0.0 (2025-12-25 revision 553f1675f3) +YJIT +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] ruby: warning: Ruby::Box is experimental, and the behavior may change in the future! See https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/4.0/Ruby/Box.html for known issues, etc. true ``` With this, Zeitwerk cannot work because it totally depends on a decoration of `Kernel#require` (done [here](https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk/blob/main/lib/zeitwerk/core_ext/kernel.rb)). Bootsnap also depends on the ability of decorating `Kernel#require` (done [here](https://github.com/rails/bootsnap/blob/main/lib/bootsnap/load_path_cache/cor...)). On one hand, these gems are walking a fine line in the border of the public interface of Ruby. On the other hand, it is a goal of boxes to be transparent to the code being loaded under them. @tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori) what should be the way to go in your opinion? /cc @byroot (Jean Boussier) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/