Issue #21688 has been updated by NuriYuri (Youri Nouri). Hi, I've read the box.md file as well as parts of the box.c file. I'm also very interested into that project but as far as I understood it's not yet ready (some stuff are still to be done as well as some additional tests). I'm sure the rdoc will be added once Ruby::Box is completed. On my side I believe it's wise to wait for 4.0 to be released because right now there's a lot of pressure on the other issues introduced by 4.0. In January it'll probably be a bit easier for the maintainer to deal with Box issues. ---------------------------------------- Misc #21688: Ruby::Box maturing path https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21688#change-115282 * Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- A quick couple of questions in the light of upcoming Ruby 4.0 release and `Ruby::Box` being available there (even if as an experimental feature): 1. Should the documentation of the class be available as RDoc? I mean, as standard class documentation at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/Ruby/Box.html (404 currently). It seems like RDoc-formatted comments are present [in the code](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/box.c#L1048) but never rendered. Are PRs to make the docs rendered and/or improve/expand them welcome, or would it be just distracting? 2. Should small(ish) problems/suggestions be reported? Can they be submitted as PRs? (I mean, things like "in some cases, `#inspect` of the class in the Box is weird", and other stuff like this) Or this would be just distracting from the main work? Thanks. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/