January 2024 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:115678] [Ruby master Bug#20055] Ripper seems to skip some checks like `void value expression` and `duplicated variable name`

by tompng (tomoya ishida)

Issue #20055 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20055: Ripper seems to skip some checks like `void value expression` and `duplicated variable name` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20055 * Author: tompng (tomoya ishida) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-12-08T07:01:01Z master f2c84c4884) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- These are syntax error ~~~ruby return + return # void value expression 1 in [a, a] # duplicated variable name 1 + (1 => [a, a]) # both ~~~ But Ripper.sexp returns S-expression, not nil ~~~ruby Ripper.sexp 'return + return' # => [:program, [[:return, [:args_add_block, [[:unary, :+@, [:return0]]], false]]]] Ripper.sexp '1 in [a, a]' # => [:program, [[:case, [:@int, "1", [1, 0]], [:in, [:aryptn, nil, [[:var_field, [:@ident, "a", [1, 6]]], [:var_field, [:@ident, "a", [1, 9]]]], nil, nil], nil, nil]]]] Ripper.sexp '1 + (1 => [a, a]) # both' # => [:program, [[:binary, [:@int, "1", [1, 0]], :+, [:paren, [[:case, [:@int, "1", [1, 5]], [:in, [:aryptn, nil, [[:var_field, [:@ident, "a", [1, 11]]], [:var_field, [:@ident, "a", [1, 14]]]], nil, nil], nil, nil]]]]]]] ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

2
1
0 0

[ruby-core:115595] [Ruby master Bug#20043] `defined?` checks for method existence but only sometimes

by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)

Issue #20043 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20043: `defined?` checks for method existence but only sometimes https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20043 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-12-05T21:25:34Z master 56eccb350b) [arm64-darwin23] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When an expression is passed to `defined?`, it will _sometimes_ check if a method in a sub-expression is defined and sometimes it won't. For example: ``` $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?(a)' nil $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?([a])' nil ``` In the above case, Ruby will check whether or not the method `a` is defined, and it returns `nil`. However, if you use a splat, it will not check: ``` $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?([*a])' "expression" ``` The same thing seems to happen with method parameters: ``` $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?(itself)' "method" $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?(itself(a))' nil $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?(itself(*a))' "method" ``` Oddly, `defined?` will check contents of arrays, but _won't_ check contents of hashes: ``` $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?([[[[a]]]])' nil $ ./miniruby -e'p defined?({ a => a })' "expression" ``` I think all of the cases that refer to `a` should check whether or not `a` is defined regardless of splats or hashes. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

6
7
0 0

[ruby-core:116026] [Ruby master Bug#20151] Can't build Ruby 3.1 on FreeBSD 14.0

by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)

Issue #20151 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20151: Can't build Ruby 3.1 on FreeBSD 14.0 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20151 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I couldn't install Ruby 3.1.3 on FreeBSD 14.0. ``` compiling util.c util.c:255:1: error: expected identifier or '(' ruby_qsort(void* base, const size_t nel, const size_t size, cmpfunc_t *cmp, void *d) ^ ./include/ruby/util.h:124:21: note: expanded from macro 'ruby_qsort' # define ruby_qsort qsort_r ^ /usr/include/stdlib.h:356:5: note: expanded from macro 'qsort_r' __generic(arg5, int (*)(void *, const void *, const void *), \ ^ /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:322:2: note: expanded from macro '__generic' _Generic(expr, t: yes, default: no) ^ 1 error generated. *** Error code 1 Stop. ``` Compiler version is here: ``` FreeBSD clang version 16.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-16.0.6-0-g7cbf1a259152) ``` I could install Ruby 3.2.2. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

3
3
0 0

[ruby-core:111965] [Ruby master Bug#19365] Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19365 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19365: Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19365 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I don't think enumerators should be able to be passed to `Ractor.new` ```ruby obj = Object.new # unshareable value p obj Ractor.new([obj].each) {|f| p f.first }.take ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

2
3
0 0

[ruby-core:112155] [Ruby master Bug#19395] Process forking within non-main Ractor creates child stuck in busy loop

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19395 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19395: Process forking within non-main Ractor creates child stuck in busy loop https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19395 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby def test_fork_in_ractor r2 = Ractor.new do pid = fork do exit Ractor.count end pid end pid = r2.take puts "Process #{Process.pid} waiting for #{pid}" _pid, status = Process.waitpid2(pid) # stuck forever if status.exitstatus != 1 raise "status is #{status.exitstatus}" end end test_fork_in_ractor() ``` $ top # shows CPU usage is high for child process -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

2
5
0 0

[ruby-core:112207] [Ruby master Bug#19408] Object no longer frozen after moved from a ractor

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19408 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19408: Object no longer frozen after moved from a ractor https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19408 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I think frozen objects should still be frozen after a move. ```ruby r = Ractor.new do obj = receive p obj.frozen? # should be true but is false p obj end obj = [Object.new].freeze r.send(obj, move: true) r.take ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

2
2
0 0

[ruby-core:115864] [Ruby master Feature#20080] Implement #begin_and_end method on Range

by stuyam (Stuart Yamartino)

Issue #20080 has been reported by stuyam (Stuart Yamartino). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20080: Implement #begin_and_end method on Range https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20080 * Author: stuyam (Stuart Yamartino) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Followup Reference: #20027 This feature request is to implement a method called `#begin_and_end` on `Range` that returns an array of the first and last value stored in a range: ```ruby (1..300).begin_and_end #=> [1, 300] first, last = (300..1).begin_and_end first #=> 300 last #=> 1 ``` I believe this would be a great addition to Ranges as they are often used to pass around a single object used to hold endpoints, and this allows easier retrieval of those endpoints. This would allow easier deconstruction into start and end values using array deconstruction as well as a simpler way to serialize to a more primitive object such as an array for database storage. This implementation was suggested by @mame in my initial feature suggestion regarding range deconstruction: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20027 This implementation would work similar to how `#minmax` works where it returns an array of two numbers, however the difference is that `#minmax` doesn't work with reverse ranges as @Dan0042 pointed out in the link above: ```ruby (1..42).minmax #=> [1, 42] (42..1).minmax #=> [nil, nil] ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

9
16
0 0

[ruby-core:116220] [Ruby master Bug#20187] Bundled gems at Ruby 3.3

by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)

Issue #20187 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20187: Bundled gems at Ruby 3.3 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20187 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This ticket is for tracking bundled gems status at Ruby 3.4. I added warnings for bundled gems of Ruby 3.3 at https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19351 and https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19776. I started to extract(promote) target libraries to bundled gems. These are: * abbrev * base64 * bigdecimal * csv * drb * getoptlong * mutex_m * nkf * observer * resolv-replace * rinda * syslog -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

2
6
0 0

[ruby-core:116435] [Ruby master Misc#20210] Invalid source encoding raises ArgumentError, not SyntaxError

by kddnewton (Kevin Newton)

Issue #20210 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton). ---------------------------------------- Misc #20210: Invalid source encoding raises ArgumentError, not SyntaxError https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20210 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- I was hoping we could change the error that is raised when an invalid source encoding is found from an ArgumentError to a SyntaxError. First let me say, if this isn't possible for backward compatibility, I understand. Please do not take this as me not caring about backward compatibility. Right now, if you have the script `# encoding: foo\n"bar"`, it will raise an ArgumentError, not a SyntaxError. If there are other syntax errors in the file, there's no way to concat them together to give feedback to the user. If a user wants to consistently handle the errors coming back from a parse, they currently have to rescue ArgumentError and SyntaxError. Ideally it would all be SyntaxError, so we could handle them consistently and append all errors together. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

6
7
0 0

[ruby-core:115991] [Ruby master Bug#20111] `defined?` returns `expression` for assignment operators combined with fully qualified constants

by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)

Issue #20111 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20111: `defined?` returns `expression` for assignment operators combined with fully qualified constants https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20111 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.2 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `defined?` doesn't consider &&=, ||= and other ...= operators as `assignment`: ```ruby defined?(A::B += 1) # => "expression" defined?(A::B &&= true) # => "expression" defined?(A::B ||= true) # => "expression" ``` But consider as `assignment` ordinal assignment: ```ruby defined?(A::B = 1) # => "assignment" ``` Wondering if it's expected behaviour. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

4
4
0 0

2024

2023

2022

ruby-core January 2024