October 2023 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:114070] [Ruby master Bug#19753] IO::Buffer#get_string can't handle negative offset

by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner)

Issue #19753 has been reported by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19753: IO::Buffer#get_string can't handle negative offset https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19753 * Author: noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby irb(main):001:0> b = IO::Buffer.for('abc') => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f858f5450c0+3 EXTERNAL READONLY SLICE> ... irb(main):002:0> b.get_string(-1) => "\x00abc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000, 3) (irb):3:in `get_string': Specified offset+length exceeds data size! (ArgumentError) from (irb):3:in `<main>' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/irb-1.7.1/exe/irb:9:in `<top (required)>' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `load' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `<main>' ``` Using a negative offset returns garbage in the string but it also might segfault: ```ruby irb(main):003:0> b = IO::Buffer.map(File.open('sgt-nodes.sql', 'r+')) => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f189de14000+2008858 EXTERNAL MAPPED SHARED> irb(main):004:0> b.get_string(-1000) (irb):4: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x00007f189de13c18 ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) [x86_64-linux] -- Control frame information ----------------------------------------------- c:0021 p:---- s:0109 e:000108 CFUNC :get_string ... ``` ## Expected behaviour I think it might be nice to have `#get_string` behave like other methods taking an offset, like `String#[]`. For example: ```ruby irb(main):001:0> b = IO::Buffer.for('abc') => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f858f5450c0+3 EXTERNAL READONLY SLICE> ... irb(main):002:0> b.get_string(-1) => "c" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-2) => "bc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000) => "abc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000, 2) => "ab" ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 days, 1 hour

5
9
0 0

[ruby-core:112304] [Ruby master Bug#19427] Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases

by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)

Issue #19427 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19427: Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19427 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.1 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I've noticed that the `freeze` option doesn't work in the following cases: - when dumped object extends a module - when dumped object responds to `#marshal_dump` and `#marshal_load` methods - when dumped object responds to `#_dump` method Is it expected behaviour or a known issue? Examples: ```ruby module M end object = Object.new object.extend(M) object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(object), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserMarshal attr_accessor :data def initialize @data = 'stuff' end def marshal_dump() :data end def marshal_load(data) @data = data end end object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(UserMarshal.new), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserDefined attr_reader :a, :b def initialize @a = 'stuff' @b = @a end def _dump(depth) Marshal.dump [:stuff, :stuff] end def self._load(data) a, b = Marshal.load data obj = allocate obj.instance_variable_set :@a, a obj.instance_variable_set :@b, b obj end end ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 days, 4 hours

5
13
0 0

[ruby-core:112873] [Ruby master Bug#19530] `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours

by dstosik (David Stosik)

Issue #19530 has been reported by dstosik (David Stosik). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19530: `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19530 * Author: dstosik (David Stosik) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [arm64-darwin22] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi everyone. 👋🏻 We recently discovered that `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` will output different results in some edge cases. Here's the smallest script I managed to write to reproduce the issue: ``` ruby class Money def initialize(amount) @amount = amount.to_f end def +(other) self.class.new(@amount + other.to_f) end def to_f @amount end end p [7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Money p [7.0] .sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Float 💥 ``` I understand that it is expected that `#sum` may not honor custom definitions of the `#+` method (particularly when the summed values are `Float`). However, I would like to bring your attention to the fact that, in the example above, calling `#sum` on an `Array` of `Float` values and calling `#sum` on an `Enumerable` that yields the same `Float` values will return results of different types. I've reproduced the same behaviour with multiple versions of Ruby going from 2.6.5 to 3.2.1. Ideally, I would expect `[7.0].sum(Money.new(0))` to return a `Money` object identical to the one returned by `[7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0))`. I think it would make sense if at least they returned an identical value (even if it is a `Float`). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 days, 8 hours

3
3
0 0

[ruby-core:114403] [Ruby master Feature#19840] [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find

by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley)

Issue #19840 has been reported by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19840: [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19840 * Author: FlickGradley (Nick Bradley) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Hello! I love Ruby's pattern matching features. I would like to propose an expansion of the Find pattern which allows the selection of multiple matching elements of an array. I often find myself dealing with data like this: ``` ruby { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }, ... ] } ``` My problem is that I need to retrieve all the `id` values from the nested array of hashes, and I don't know how many there will be in advance. It seems that the Find pattern could be expanded from allowing `pattern` (matching a single element) to `*pattern`. Examples: ``` ruby # Base case case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # With * at the end (rest of args) - same result case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }, *] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # When one element doesn't match and there is no *rest case { results: [{ name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> not matched ``` Similarly, `*Constant` could work to pull out types with an As pattern: ``` ruby case [1, 2, 3, "string"] in *Integer => nums, * "matched: #{nums}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2, 3] ``` Other patterns would work in the same way. Essentially, this expands the concept of `*` in pattern matching to mean "a variable number of `things matching subpattern`". Today, the only pattern supported by `*` is a variable binding - but it could be any of the other subpatterns as well. This proposal does imply that this would work: ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, 2, 3] in [*, *^a, *] #=> true ``` To me, the `*` represents the variable number of matches, so the syntax makes intuitive sense. But others may have different opinions about `*^` being adjacent. It may also imply this would work, though we could restrict the number of non-variable patterns (in other words, patterns that have the possibility of not matching) to 1 per Array so that this isn't possible.. I'm not sure something like this would be useful or clear. ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, "hello", "ruby"] in [*Integer, *String] #=> true ``` This feature feels like the missing piece of the Find pattern to me - I often want to "Find Multiple". If others agree, I would be happy to contribute by working on this feature and creating a pull request. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 days, 12 hours

3
2
0 0

[ruby-core:115014] [Ruby master Bug#19920] Ruby 3.1 fails to build with --enable-shared on macos-arm64: is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')

by Eregon (Benoit Daloze)

Issue #19920 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19920: Ruby 3.1 fails to build with --enable-shared on macos-arm64: is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '') https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19920 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- See https://github.com/ruby/ruby-builder/actions/runs/6494296018/job/1763696879… ``` installing bundled gems: /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0 minitest 5.15.0 power_assert 2.0.1 rake 13.0.6 test-unit 3.5.3 rexml 3.2.5 rss 0.2.9 net-ftp 0.1.3 net-imap 0.2.3 net-pop 0.1.1 net-smtp 0.3.1 matrix 0.4.2 prime 0.1.2 rbs 2.7.0 Building native extensions. This could take a while... /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:102:in `run': ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. (Gem::Ext::BuildError) current directory: /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems/rbs-2.7.0/ext/rbs_extension /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/bin/ruby -I /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib extconf.rb checking for whether -std=c99 is accepted as CFLAGS... *** extconf.rb failed *** Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may need configuration options. Provided configuration options: --with-opt-dir --without-opt-dir --with-opt-include --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include --with-opt-lib --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib --with-make-prog --without-make-prog --srcdir=. --curdir --ruby=/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/bin/$(RUBY_BASE_NAME) /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:490:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError) You have to install development tools first. from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:616:in `block in try_compile' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:563:in `with_werror' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:616:in `try_compile' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:680:in `try_cflags' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:1025:in `block (2 levels) in append_cflags' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:989:in `block in checking_for' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:354:in `block (2 levels) in postpone' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:324:in `open' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:354:in `block in postpone' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:324:in `open' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:350:in `postpone' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:988:in `checking_for' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:1024:in `block in append_cflags' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:1023:in `each' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/mkmf.rb:1023:in `append_cflags' from extconf.rb:3:in `<main>' To see why this extension failed to compile, please check the mkmf.log which can be found here: /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/extensions/arm64-darwin-22/3.1.0/rbs-2.7.0/mkmf.log extconf failed, exit code 1 Gem files will remain installed in /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems/rbs-2.7.0 for inspection. Results logged to /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/extensions/arm64-darwin-22/3.1.0/rbs-2.7.0/gem_make.out from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/ext_conf_builder.rb:28:in `build' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:171:in `build_extension' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:205:in `block in build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:202:in `each' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:202:in `build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/installer.rb:843:in `build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/installer.rb:326:in `install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:899:in `block in install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:713:in `no_write' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:899:in `install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1063:in `block (2 levels) in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1044:in `foreach' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1044:in `block in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1119:in `block in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1116:in `each' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1116:in `<main>' /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:102:in `run': extconf failed, exit code 1 (Gem::InstallError) from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/ext_conf_builder.rb:28:in `build' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:171:in `build_extension' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:205:in `block in build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:202:in `each' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:202:in `build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/installer.rb:843:in `build_extensions' from /private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/lib/rubygems/installer.rb:326:in `install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:899:in `block in install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:713:in `no_write' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:899:in `install' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1063:in `block (2 levels) in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1044:in `foreach' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1044:in `block in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1119:in `block in <main>' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1116:in `each' from ./tool/rbinstall.rb:1116:in `<main>' make: *** [do-install-nodoc] Error 1 BUILD FAILED (macOS 13.6 using ruby-build 20231012) ``` And the mkmf.log: ``` DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=.:/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib:/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4 "clang -o conftest -I/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/include/ruby-3.1.0/arm64-darwin22 -I/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/include/ruby-3.1.0/ruby/backward -I/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/include/ruby-3.1.0 -I. -I/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/include -DENABLE_PATH_CHECK=0 -I/opt/homebrew/opt/gmp/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE -D_DARWIN_UNLIMITED_SELECT -D_REENTRANT -fdeclspec -O3 -fno-fast-math -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeprecated-declarations -Wdivision-by-zero -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wimplicit-int -Wmisleading-indentation -Wpointer-arith -Wshorten-64-to-32 -Wwrite-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-cast-function-type -Wno-constant-logical-operand -Wno-long-long -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-self-assign -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-value -Wunused-variable -Wextra-tokens -Wundef -fno-common -pipe conftest.c -L. -L/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib -L. -L/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib -fstack-protector-strong -L/opt/homebrew/opt/gmp/lib -lruby.3.1 " dyld[47952]: terminating because inserted dylib '/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' could not be loaded: tried: '/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')), '/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (no such file), '/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')), './libruby.3.1.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')) dyld[47952]: tried: '/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')), '/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (no such file), '/private/var/folders/df/1dm_t2rx0054k7bw1g_7nyl80000gn/T/ruby-build.20231012101401.55539.tTlMYN/ruby-3.1.4/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')), './libruby.3.1.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.1.4/arm64/lib/libruby.3.1.dylib' (mach-o file, but is an incompatible architecture (have 'arm64', need '')) checked program was: /* begin */ 1: #include "ruby.h" 2: 3: int main(int argc, char **argv) 4: { 5: return !!argv[argc]; 6: } /* end */ ``` I believe this bug has nothing to do with ruby-build except that ruby-build does `--enable-shared` by default. A known workaround is to use `--disable-shared`: https://github.com/rbenv/ruby-build/discussions/1961#discussioncomment-4031… Lots of other people met the same or similar issue as discussed there. Also discussed in https://github.com/ruby/rbs/issues/877 It would be nice if this could be fixed on the 3.1 branch. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 week, 4 days

2
3
0 0

[ruby-core:115196] [Ruby master Feature#19979] Allow methods to declare that they don't accept a block via `&nil`

by ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu)

Issue #19979 has been reported by ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19979: Allow methods to declare that they don't accept a block via `&nil` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19979 * Author: ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ## Abstract This feature proposes new syntax to allow methods to explicitly declare that they don't accept blocks, and makes passing of a block to such methods an error. ## Background In #15554, it was proposed to automatically detect methods that do not use the block passed to them, and to error if a block was passed to such methods. As far as I can tell, it was later on closed since #10499 solved a large part of the problem. That proposal has, as part of the dev meeting discussion, a proposal from @matz to allow methods to use `&nil` to explicitly declare that they don't accept a block. At the time, the proposal was trying to solve a bigger problem, so this sub-proposal was never considered seriously. However, notes in the proposal say: > It is explicit, but it is tough to add this `&nil` parameter declaration to all of methods (do you want to add it to `def []=(i, e, &nil)`?). (I agree `&nil` is valuable on some situations) This proposal extracts that sub-proposal to make this a new language feature. ## Proposal In Ruby, it is always valid for the caller to pass a block to a method call, even if the callee is not expecting a block to be passed. This leads to subtle user errors, where the author of some code assumes a method call uses a block, but the block passed to the method call is silently ignored. The proposal is to introduce `&nil` at method declaration sites to mean "This method does not accept a block". This is symmetric to the ability to pass `&nil` at call sites to mean "I am not passing a block to this method call", which is sometimes useful when making `super` calls (since blocks are always implicitly passed). Explicitly, the proposal is to make the following behaviour be a part of Ruby: ```ruby def find(item = nil, &nil) # some implementation that doesn't call `yield` or `block_given?` end find { |i| i == 42 } # => ArgumentError: passing block to the method `find' that does not accept a block. ``` ## Implementation I assume the implementation would be a grammar change to make `&nil` valid at method declaration sites, as well as raising an `ArgumentError` for methods that are called with a block but are declared with `&nil`. ## Evaluation Since I don't have an implementation, I can't make a proper evaluation of the feature proposal. However, I would expect the language changes to be minimal with no runtime costs for methods that don't use the `&nil` syntax. ## Discussion This proposal has much smaller scope than #15554 so that the Ruby language can start giving library authors the ability to explicitly mark their methods as not accepting a block. This is fully backward compatible, since it is an opt-in behaviour and not an opt-out one. Future directions after this feature proposal could be a way to signal to the VM that any method in a file that doesn't explicitly use `yield`/`block_given?` or explicitly declared a block parameter should be treated as not accepting a block. This can be done via some kind of pragma similar to `frozen_string_literal`, or through other means. However, such future directions are beyond the scope of this proposal. ## Summary Adding the ability for methods to declare that they don't accept a block will make writing code against such methods safer and more resilient, and will prevent silently ignored behaviour that is often hard to catch or troubleshoot. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 week, 5 days

9
18
0 0

[ruby-core:111448] [Ruby master Bug#19266] URI::Generic should use URI::RFC3986_PARSER instead of URI::DEFAULT_PARSER

by gareth (Gareth Adams)

Issue #19266 has been reported by gareth (Gareth Adams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19266: URI::Generic should use URI::RFC3986_PARSER instead of URI::DEFAULT_PARSER https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19266 * Author: gareth (Gareth Adams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.1.3p185 (2022-11-24 revision 1a6b16756e) [arm64-darwin21] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- In June 2014, [`uri/common` was updated][1] to introduce a RFC3986-compliant parser (`URI::RFC3986_PARSER`) as an alternative to the previous RFC2396 parser, and common methods like `URI()` were updated to use that new parser by default. The only methods in `common` not updated were [`URI.extract` and `URI.regexp`][2] which are marked as obsolete. (The old parser was kept in the `DEFAULT_PARSER` constant despite it not being the default for those methods, presumably for backward compatibility.) However, similar [methods called on `URI::Generic`][3] were never updated to use this new parser. This means that methods like `URI::Generic.build` fail when given input that succeeds normally, and this also affects subclasses like URI::HTTP: ``` $ pry -r uri -r uri/common -r uri/generic [1] pry(main)> URI::Generic.build(host: "underscore_host.example") URI::InvalidComponentError: bad component(expected host component): underscore_host.example from /Users/gareth/.asdf/installs/ruby/3.1.3/lib/ruby/3.1.0/uri/generic.rb:591:in `check_host' [2] pry(main)> URI::HTTP.build(host: "underscore_host.example") URI::InvalidComponentError: bad component(expected host component): underscore_host.example from /Users/gareth/.asdf/installs/ruby/3.1.3/lib/ruby/3.1.0/uri/generic.rb:591:in `check_host' [3] pry(main)> URI("http://underscore_host.example") => #<URI::HTTP http://underscore_host.example> ``` `URI::Generic.new` allows a configurable `parser` positional argument to override the class' default parser, but other factory methods like `.build` don't allow this override. Arguably this doesn't cause problems because at least in the case above, the URI can be built with the polymorphic constructor, but having the option to build URIs from explicit named parts is useful, and leaving the outdated functionality in the `Generic` class is ambiguous. It's possible that the whole Generic class and its subclasses aren't intended to be used directly how I'm intending here, but there's nothing I could see that suggested this is the case. I'm not aware of the entire list of differences between RFC2396 and RFC3986. The relevant difference here is that in RFC2396 an individual segment of a host ([`domainlabel`s][4]) could only be `alphanum | alphanum *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum`, whereas RFC3986 allows [hostnames][5] to include any of `ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"`. It's possible that other differences might cause issues for developers, but since this has gone over 8 years without anyone else caring about this, this is definitely not especially urgent. [1]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/bb83f32dc3e0424d25fa4e55d8ff32b061320e41 [2]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/28a17436503c3c4cb7a35b423a894b697cd80da9/… [3]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/28a17436503c3c4cb7a35b423a894b697cd80da9/… [4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2396#section-3.2.2 [5]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#page-13 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 month, 1 week

2
3
0 0

[ruby-core:113195] [Ruby master Bug#19592] Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4

by npic1 (Nat Pic1)

Issue #19592 has been reported by npic1 (Nat Pic1). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19592: Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19592 * Author: npic1 (Nat Pic1) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi, I need to statically link a single extension (not all of them) by adding it to ext/Setup. This worked until version 3.1.4 and 3.2.x. It appears that this change broke it: [https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-master/repository/git/revisions/79… [https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6756](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6…. I have attached a script to reproduce the issue. When running the script, `ldd` fails with: ``` ext/extinit.o: in function `Init_ext': extinit.c:(.text+0x10): undefined reference to `ruby_init_ext' ``` ---Files-------------------------------- ruby_static_test.sh (1.57 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 month, 1 week

2
2
0 0

[ruby-core:113782] [Ruby master Bug#19716] SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc)

by alexdowad (Alex Dowad)

Issue #19716 has been reported by alexdowad (Alex Dowad). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19716: SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19716 * Author: alexdowad (Alex Dowad) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.1.4p223 (2023-03-30 revision 957bb7cb81) [x86_64-linux-musl] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This is the same problem previously reported against Ruby 2.5 in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387. I just ran into the same problem on Ruby 3.1.4, built on Alpine Linux 3.16. @hsbt stated in the previous thread (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387#note-28): > If you have this issue with Ruby 3.2, please file it with another issue. I hacked `stack_check` in gc.c to print the values of `STACK_START` and `STACK_END` on stack overflow; on the Alpine 3.16 host where this problem just occurred, the values printed were: > Start=0x7ffd0bf4f000, End=0x7ffd0bf32530 ...which shows that Ruby thinks the stack size is only 131072 bytes. On the other hand, `ulimit -s` shows a stack size limit of 8192kb. This Ruby 3.1.4 was built from unmodified source code downloaded from https://cache.ruby-lang.org; the build was configured using `CFLAGS='-march=native' ./configure --disable-install-doc`. The invocation of Ruby which blew the stack was `bundle exec rake db:migrate`, on a mid-sized Rails project. Regarding @ncopa's patch from #14387, @wanabe listed some things which should be done before it is merged into mainline Ruby: > Okay, The patch needs one or more proofs of its behaviour, like that: > > Original issue [ruby-dev:50421] has gone away. > Standard test codes run well. > test-all > ruby/spec > getrlimit works on some situations like: > on single thread > with multiple threads > with RLIMIT_STACK environment variable > getrlimit code of musl is implemented correctly as expected. > (But It's doubtful whether it can be. I guess that a proof of code soundness is very difficult.) > Some "real world" applications can work. > I think it is better example that that application(s) can't work without the patch. I am happy to help cover some of these points if the Ruby development team is still interested in merging @ncopa's patch. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 month, 3 weeks

4
5
0 0

[ruby-core:111306] [Ruby master Feature#19236] Allow to create hashes with a specific capacity from Ruby

by byroot (Jean Boussier)

Issue #19236 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19236: Allow to create hashes with a specific capacity from Ruby https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19236 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Target version: 3.3 ---------------------------------------- Followup on [Feature #18683] which added a C-API for this purpose. Various protocol parsers such as Redis `RESP3` or `msgpack`, have to create hashes, and they know the size in advance. For efficiency, it would be preferable if they could directly allocate a Hash of the necessary size, so that large hashes wouldn't cause many re-alloccations and re-hash. `String` and `Array` both already offer similar APIs: ```ruby String.new(capacity: XXX) Array.new(XX) / rb_ary_new_capa(long) ``` However there's no such public API for Hashes in Ruby land. ### Proposal I think `Hash` should have a way to create a new hash with a `capacity` parameter. The logical signature of `Hash.new(capacity: 1000)` was deemed too incompatible in [Feature #18683]. @Eregon proposed to add `Hash.create(capacity: 1000)`. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 month, 3 weeks

7
13
0 0

2024

2023

2022

ruby-core October 2023