October 2023 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:113966] [Ruby master Bug#19742] Introduce `Module#anonymous?`

by ioquatix (Samuel Williams)

Issue #19742 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19742: Introduce `Module#anonymous?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19742 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- As a follow-on <from https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19521>, I'd like propose we introduce `Module#anonymous?`. In some situations, like logging/formatting, serialisation/deserialization, debugging or meta-programming, we might like to know if a class is a proper constant or not. However, this brings about some other issues which might need to be discussed. After assigning a constant, then removing it, the internal state of Ruby still believes that the class name is permanent, even thought it's no longer true. e.g. ``` m = Module.new m.anonymous? # true M = m m.anonyomous # false Object.send(:remove_const, :M) M # uninitialized constant M (NameError) M.anonymous? # false ``` Because RCLASS data structure is not updated after the constant is removed, internally the state still has a "permanent class name". I want to use this proposal to discuss this issue and whether there is anything we should do about such behaviour (or even if it's desirable). Proposed PR: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7966 cc @fxn -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 month, 4 weeks

9
46
0 0

[ruby-core:115169] [Ruby master Bug#19973] Duplicate keyword argument names don't always warn

by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)

Issue #19973 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19973: Duplicate keyword argument names don't always warn https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19973 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-10-24T19:38:50Z cleanup 3525a9bd22) [arm64-darwin23] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Calling a method with duplicate keyword arguments doesn't warn when it could: ```ruby def bar a:, b: a + b end # Warning bar(a: 1, b: 3, a: 2) z = { b: 123 } # No warning bar(a: 1, **z, a: 2) ``` The first call to `bar` gives a warning about duplicate keyword args, but the second call doesn't. I think both cases should emit a warning. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 2 weeks

3
3
0 0

[ruby-core:115117] [Ruby master Bug#19967] Already installed libruby.dylib is used for test on macOS

by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)

Issue #19967 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19967: Already installed libruby.dylib is used for test on macOS https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19967 * Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Backport: 3.0: REQUIRED, 3.1: REQUIRED, 3.2: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- On macOS, in the case of `--enable-shared` and `--disable-load-relative`, already install libruby.dylib is used during tests if exists. This is because since [Bug #14992], `DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH` is used instead of `DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH`. The latter environment variable is used preferentially, whereas the former is used as a fallback, as the name implies. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

[ruby-core:111965] [Ruby master Bug#19365] Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19365 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19365: Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19365 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I don't think enumerators should be able to be passed to `Ractor.new` ```ruby obj = Object.new # unshareable value p obj Ractor.new([obj].each) {|f| p f.first }.take ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 3 weeks

2
3
0 0

[ruby-core:112155] [Ruby master Bug#19395] Process forking within non-main Ractor creates child stuck in busy loop

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19395 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19395: Process forking within non-main Ractor creates child stuck in busy loop https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19395 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby def test_fork_in_ractor r2 = Ractor.new do pid = fork do exit Ractor.count end pid end pid = r2.take puts "Process #{Process.pid} waiting for #{pid}" _pid, status = Process.waitpid2(pid) # stuck forever if status.exitstatus != 1 raise "status is #{status.exitstatus}" end end test_fork_in_ractor() ``` $ top # shows CPU usage is high for child process -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 3 weeks

2
5
0 0

[ruby-core:112207] [Ruby master Bug#19408] Object no longer frozen after moved from a ractor

by luke-gru (Luke Gruber)

Issue #19408 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19408: Object no longer frozen after moved from a ractor https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19408 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I think frozen objects should still be frozen after a move. ```ruby r = Ractor.new do obj = receive p obj.frozen? # should be true but is false p obj end obj = [Object.new].freeze r.send(obj, move: true) r.take ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

[ruby-core:114915] [Ruby master Feature#19905] Introduce `Queue#peek`

by hi＠joaofernandes.me (Joao Fernandes)

Issue #19905 has been reported by hi(a)joaofernandes.me (Joao Fernandes). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19905: Introduce `Queue#peek` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19905 * Author: hi(a)joaofernandes.me (Joao Fernandes) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- This ticket proposes the introduction of the `Queue#peek` method, similar to what we can find in other object oriented languages such as Java and C#. This method is similar to `Queue#pop`, but does not change the data, nor does it require a lock. ``` q = Queue.new([1,2,3]) => #<Thread::Queue:0x00000001065d7148> q.peek => 1 q.peek => 1 ``` I have felt the need of this for debugging, but I think that it can also be of practical use for presentation. I believe that the only drawback could be that newcomers could misuse it in multi-threaded work without taking into account that this method is not thread safe. I also volunteer myself to implement this method. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 3 weeks

6
7
0 0

[ruby-core:115143] [Ruby master Bug#19970] Eval leaks callcache and callinfo objects on arm32 (linux)

by larsin (Lars Ingjer)

Issue #19970 has been reported by larsin (Lars Ingjer). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19970: Eval leaks callcache and callinfo objects on arm32 (linux) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19970 * Author: larsin (Lars Ingjer) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [armv7l-linux-eabihf] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The following script demonstrates a memory leak on arm 32 (linux): ``` ruby def gcdiff(n) GC.start if @last_gc_stat puts "GC.stat #{n} diff old_objects: #{GC.stat(:old_objects) - @last_gc_stat}" end @last_gc_stat = GC.stat(:old_objects) end def foo end 10.times do |i| 10_000.times do eval 'foo' end gcdiff(i) puts "Number of live objects: #{GC.stat(:heap_live_slots)}" puts "Memory usage: #{`ps -o rss= -p #{$$}`}" puts end ``` Output: ``` Number of live objects: 41303 Memory usage: 11900 GC.stat 1 diff old_objects: 20037 Number of live objects: 61317 Memory usage: 13604 GC.stat 2 diff old_objects: 20001 Number of live objects: 81317 Memory usage: 14880 GC.stat 3 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 101317 Memory usage: 16596 GC.stat 4 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 121317 Memory usage: 17248 GC.stat 5 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 141317 Memory usage: 18760 GC.stat 6 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 161317 Memory usage: 19540 GC.stat 7 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 181317 Memory usage: 21752 GC.stat 8 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 201317 Memory usage: 21828 GC.stat 9 diff old_objects: 20000 Number of live objects: 221317 Memory usage: 24896 ``` ObjectSpace.count_imemo_objects shows that imemo_callcache and imemo_callinfo are leaking. The issue does not occur on arm64 mac or x86_64 linux with the same ruby version. The issue has also been reproduced with the latest 3.2.2 snapshot (2023-09-30). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

[ruby-core:112947] [Ruby master Bug#19542] Operations on zero-sized IO::Buffer are raising

by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki)

Issue #19542 has been reported by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19542: Operations on zero-sized IO::Buffer are raising https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19542 * Author: hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I found that IO::Buffer of zero length is not cloneable. ``` % ruby -v ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] % ruby -e 'p IO::Buffer.for("").dup' -e:1:in `initialize_copy': The buffer is not allocated! (IO::Buffer::AllocationError) from -e:1:in `initialize_dup' from -e:1:in `dup' from -e:1:in `<main>' % ruby -e 'p IO::Buffer.new(0).dup' -e:1: warning: IO::Buffer is experimental and both the Ruby and C interface may change in the future! -e:1:in `initialize_copy': The buffer is not allocated! (IO::Buffer::AllocationError) from -e:1:in `initialize_dup' from -e:1:in `dup' from -e:1:in `<main>' ``` It seems `IO::Buffer.new(0)` allocates no memory for buffer on object creation and thus prohibits reading from or writing to it. So `#dup` method copying zero bytes into the new IO::Buffer raises the exception. Empty buffers, however, often appear in corner cases of usual operations (encrypting an empty string, encoding an empty list of items into binary, etc.) and it would be easy if such cases could be handled consistently. Other operations on NULL IO::Buffers are also useful but currently raising. ``` IO::Buffer.new(0) <=> IO::Buffer.new(1) IO::Buffer.new(0).each(:U8).to_a IO::Buffer.new(0).get_values([], 0) IO::Buffer.new(0).set_values([], 0, []) ``` I'm not sure this is a bug or by design, but at least I don't want cloning and comparison to raise. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months

3
5
0 0

[ruby-core:112552] [Ruby master Bug#19461] Time.local performance tanks in forked process (on macOS only?)

by ioquatix (Samuel Williams)

Issue #19461 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19461: Time.local performance tanks in forked process (on macOS only?) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19461 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The following program demonstrates a performance regression in forked child processes when invoking `Time.local`: ```ruby require 'benchmark' require 'time' def sir_local_alot result = Benchmark.measure do 10_000.times do tm = ::Time.local(2023) end end $stderr.puts result end sir_local_alot pid = fork do sir_local_alot end Process.wait(pid) ``` On Linux the performance is similar, but on macOS, the performance is over 100x worse on my M1 laptop. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 months, 1 week

4
8
0 0

2024

2023

2022

ruby-core October 2023