Issue #19442 has been updated by byroot (Jean Boussier).
Similarly I think we should remove all the `RGENGC_WB_PROTECTED_*` flags
https://github.com/Shopify/ruby/commit/078d46c47cb0e41165e0112cd9669b325662….
----------------------------------------
Bug #19442: Remove USE_RINCGC flag
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19442#change-101965
* Author: eightbitraptor (Matthew Valentine-House)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
[GitHub PR #7317](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7313)
~~Ruby doesn't compile when USE_RINCGC is disabled. It's also not being tested in
CI. As @nobu has pointed out in comments on the PR, fixing it is simple.~~ This was fixed
in [this
commit](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/21543ac86ce0b730c1381588d7dc9eb…
I think we should remove `USE_RINCGC` entirely and always run with incremental GC enabled,
because I don't think this flag is being actively used, and removing it will simplify
the code and reduce the cognitive overhead of working with the GC.
We have a precedent for this: `USE_RGENGC=0` was removed [in this
commit](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/62c2b8c74e47652fc5bbaf6150f4acd…
almost 3 years ago. `USE_RINCGC=0` is in a similar state. It has been broken for almost a
year (since [this
commit](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/dde164e968e382d50b07ad455946888…),
and [disabled in CI for more than 2
years](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/46d3ea2c2569e2e5a9ee3e7e206f07f0….
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/