Issue #19351 has been updated by kou (Kouhei Sutou).
I'm OK with gems maintained by me.
----------------------------------------
Bug #19351: Promote bundled gems at Ruby 3.3
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19351#change-101306
* Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
In Ruby 3.2, the default gems and bundled gems are changed only adding `syntax_suggest`. I
and some committers are considering promote default gems to bundled gems again for Ruby
3.3+.
We hope to keep the current developer experience with dependency resolution and ignore the
additional work like "Put gem "xxx" into your Gemfile" for
developers.
### Proposal
We propose the following libraries will promote default gems to bundled gems at Ruby 3.3.
They are not the dependencies of Rails and RubyGems/Bundler.
```
abbrev
getoptlong
optparse
observable
resolv
resolv-replace
rinda
un
fcntl
nkf
syslog
win32ole
```
### Additional works
I also propose to promote rails dependencies without rubygems/bundler deps:
```
base64
benchmark
delegate
drb
forwardable
ipaddr
irb
mutex_m
ostruct
rdoc
singleton
tsort
weakref
bigdecimal
date(datetime)
racc
```
and gems maintained by @kou
```
csv
strscan
fiddle
stringio
```
But if we promote them to bundled gems, many of users need to add `gem "csv"`
into their Gemfile. I'm considering to avoid this situation.
Can we the specific feature of bundled gems to RubyGems or Bundler? Example, bundler have
allowed list for bundled gems. So, listed gems could be require without Gemfile under the
bundle exec.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/