[ruby-core:111877] [Ruby master Bug#19351] Promote bundled gems at Ruby 3.3

Issue #19351 has been updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). I update rails dependencies. @vo.x Thanks for your comment. Maybe we should remove `irb` from this list. I welcome feedback for these list and additional gem proposal like `cgi`, `erb` and others. ---------------------------------------- Bug #19351: Promote bundled gems at Ruby 3.3 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19351#change-101292 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- In Ruby 3.2, the default gems and bundled gems are changed only adding `syntax_suggest`. I and some committers are considering promote default gems to bundled gems again for Ruby 3.3+. We hope to keep the current developer experience with dependency resolution and ignore the additional work like "Put gem "xxx" into your Gemfile" for developers. ### Proposal We propose the following libraries will promote default gems to bundled gems at Ruby 3.3. They are not the dependencies of Rails and RubyGems/Bundler. ``` abbrev getoptlong optparse observable resolv resolv-replace rinda un fcntl nkf syslog win32ole ``` ### Additional works I also propose to promote rails dependencies without rubygems/bundler deps: ``` base64 benchmark delegate drb forwardable ipaddr irb mutex_m ostruct rdoc singleton tsort weakref bigdecimal date(datetime) racc ``` and gems maintained by @kou ``` csv strscan fiddle stringio ``` But if we promote them to bundled gems, many of users need to add `gem "csv"` into their Gemfile. I'm considering to avoid this situation. Can we the specific feature of bundled gems to RubyGems or Bundler? Example, bundler have allowed list for bundled gems. So, listed gems could be require without Gemfile under the bundle exec. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/