ruby-core

Download

ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org

July 2023

1 participants
172 discussions

[ruby-core:112773] [Ruby master Feature#19521] Support for `Module#name=` and `Class#name=`.
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 02 Jul '23

02 Jul '23

Issue #19521 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19521: Support for `Module#name=` and `Class#name=`. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19521 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19450 for previous discussion and motivation. This proposal introduces `Class#name=` to set the temporary class name. This is an alternative or addition to <https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19520>. ```ruby c = Class.new do self.name = "fake name" end c = Class.new c.name = "fake name" ``` Alternatively, we could use `set_name`: ```ruby Class.new do set_name "fake_name" end ``` ## Example usage The current Ruby test suite has code which shows the usefulness of this new method: ```ruby def labeled_module(name, &block) Module.new do singleton_class.class_eval { define_method(:to_s) {name} alias inspect to_s alias name to_s } class_eval(&block) if block end end module_function :labeled_module def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block) Class.new(superclass) do singleton_class.class_eval { define_method(:to_s) {name} alias inspect to_s alias name to_s } class_eval(&block) if block end end module_function :labeled_class ``` The updated code would look like this: ```ruby def labeled_module(name, &block) Module.new do self.name = name class_eval(&block) if block end end def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block) Class.new(superclass) do self.name = name class_eval(&block) if block end end module_function :labeled_class ``` Because the name cannot be set as part of `.new`, we have to have a separate block to set the name, before calling `class_eval`. I think the ergonomics and performance of this are slightly worse than the [counter proposal](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19520). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

10 30

[ruby-core:114065] [Ruby master Feature#17339] Semantic grouping with BigDecimal#to_s
by cryptogopher (crypto gopher) 01 Jul '23

01 Jul '23

Issue #17339 has been updated by cryptogopher (crypto gopher). I've sent pull request with solution as specified by author of issue: https://github.com/ruby/bigdecimal/pull/264 ---------------------------------------- Feature #17339: Semantic grouping with BigDecimal#to_s https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17339#change-103736 * Author: chumaltd (Takahiro Chuma) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: mrkn (Kenta Murata) ---------------------------------------- # Abstract Thousands, millions, ... should be expressible with `BigDecimal#to_s`. # Background `BigDecimal('1234567').to_s('3F')` returns "123 456 7.0". # Proposal - Have an option with which `BigDecimal('1234567').to_s('3F')` returns "_1 234 567_.0". - With decimal, `BigDecimal('1234567.8901234').to_s('3F')` should return "1 234 567.890 123 4". - Default behavior should be the above in long term. - And/Or, it would be nice to have a pretty method name. I think #to_s('3F') has universal use cases like money calculation. # Discussion - International System of Units aka SI defines 3-digit-grouping on long numeric sequence. https://www1.bipm.org/jsp/en/ViewCGPMResolution.jsp?CGPM=22&RES=10 - Original discussion in 1948 shows some example of 3-digit-grouping. https://www1.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CGPM/CGPM9.pdf#page=117 # Summary We want to have a natural format. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

Jump to page: