March 2024 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:115016] [Ruby master Bug#19921] TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 test failure
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

Issue #19921 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19921: TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 test failure https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19921 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-10-12 master 52709a4862) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Testing with 52709a4862 on Fedora Rawhide, I observe following failure: ~~~ 94) Failure: TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 [/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-3.3.0-52709a4862/test/ruby/test_yjit.rb:1126]: Expected no exits, but got {:opt_and=>1} ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 21

[ruby-core:112045] [Ruby master Bug#19378] Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems
by aidog (Andi Idogawa) 27 Jul '26

27 Jul '26

Issue #19378 has been reported by aidog (Andi Idogawa). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19378: Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19378 * Author: aidog (Andi Idogawa) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.0 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hello 🙂 ## Problem require is slow on windows for big gems. (example: require 'gtk3'=> 3 seconds+). This is a problem for people who want to make cross platform GUI apps with ruby. ## Possible Reason As touched on in [#15797](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15797) it seems like require uses realpath, which is emulated on windows. It checks every parent directory. The same syscalls run many times. ## Testfile C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb: ``` ruby require __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" require __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` shell ruby --disable-gems C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb ``` ### Syscalls per File/Directory: 1. CreateFile 2. QueryInformationVolume 3. QueryIdInformation 4. QueryAllInformationFile 5. QueryNameInformationFile 6. QueryNameInformationFile 7. QueryNormalizedNameInformationFile 8. CloseFile ### Files/Directories checked 1. C:\tmp 2. C:\tmp\speedtest 3. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld1.rb 4. C:\tmp 5. C:\tmp\speedtest 6. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld2.rb For two required files Ruby had to do 8*6 = **48** syscalls. The syscalls orginate from rb_w32_reparse_symlink_p / lstat Rubygems live in subfolders with 9+ parts: "C:\Ruby32-x64\lib\ruby\gems\3.2.0\gems\glib2-4.0.8\lib\glib2\variant.rb" Each file takes 8 * 9 = **72**+ calls. For variant.rb it is **80** calls. The result for the syscalls don't change in such a short time, so it should be possible to cache it. With require_relative it's twice as many calls. ## Other testcases Same result: ``` ruby File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` ruby File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` It does not happen in $LOAD_PATH.resolve_feature_path(__dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb") ## Request Would it be possible to cache the stat calls when using require? I tried to implement a cache inside the ruby source code, but failed. If not, is there now a way to combine ruby files into one? I previously talked about require here: [YJIT: Windows support lacking.](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19325#note-11) ## How to reproduce Ruby versions: At least 3.0+, most likely older ones too. Tested using Ruby Installer 3.1 and 3.2. [Procmon Software by Sysinternals](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/proc… -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 9

[ruby-core:116456] [Ruby master Feature#20215] Introduce `IO#readable?`
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 25 Jul '26

25 Jul '26

Issue #20215 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20215: Introduce `IO#readable?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20215 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- There are some cases where, as an optimisation, it's useful to know whether more data is potentially available. We already have `IO#eof?` but the problem with using `IO#eof?` is that it can block indefinitely for sockets. Therefore, code which uses `IO#eof?` to determine if there is potentially more data, may hang. ```ruby def make_request(path = "/") client = connect_remote_host # HTTP/1.0 request: client.write("GET #{path} HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n") # Read response client.gets("\r\n") # => "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n" # Assuming connection close, there are two things the server can do: # 1. peer.close # 2. peer.write(...); peer.close if client.eof? # <--- Can hang here! puts "Connection closed" # Avoid yielding as we know there definitely won't be any data. else puts "Connection open, data may be available..." # There might be data available, so yield. yield(client) end ensure client&.close end make_request do |client| puts client.read # <--- Prefer to wait here. end ``` The proposed `IO#readable?` is similar to `IO#eof?` but rather than blocking, would simply return false. The expectation is the user will subsequently call `read` which may then wait. The proposed implementation would look something like this: ```ruby class IO def readable? !!self.closed? end end class BasicSocket # Is it likely that the socket is still connected? # May return false positive, but won't return false negative. def readable? return false unless super # If we can wait for the socket to become readable, we know that the socket may still be open. result = self.recv_nonblock(1, MSG_PEEK, exception: false) # No data was available - newer Ruby can return nil instead of empty string: return false if result.nil? # Either there was some data available, or we can wait to see if there is data avaialble. return !result.empty? || result == :wait_readable rescue Errno::ECONNRESET # This might be thrown by recv_nonblock. return false end end ``` For `IO` itself, when there is buffered data, `readable?` would also return true immediately, similar to `eof?`. This is not shown in the above implementation as I'm not sure if there is any Ruby method which exposes "there is buffered data". -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

8 19

[ruby-core:115018] [Ruby master Bug#19922] ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV
by wanabe (_ wanabe) 20 Jul '26

20 Jul '26

Issue #19922 has been reported by wanabe (_ wanabe). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19922: ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19922 * Author: wanabe (_ wanabe) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `ObjectSpace.dump_all` in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV. The reproduce code is here: ``` $ ruby -robjspace -e 'def dump; 10.times { ObjectSpace.dump_all } end; Thread.new { dump }; dump' /home/wanabe/.rbenv/versions/master/lib/ruby/3.3.0+0/objspace.rb:100: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 (snip) ``` I attached the full log. I assumed that: - Thread1 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd1 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread2 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread1 - gets unexpected `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 ---Files-------------------------------- bug.log (23.1 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 5

[ruby-core:113743] [Ruby master Feature#19708] Support `attr_reader :foo?`
by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

Issue #19708 has been reported by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19708: Support `attr_reader :foo?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19708 * Author: AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Creating reader methods with `attr_reader` is preferable over defining them by hand, not only because it's more convenient, but also because it hits a fast path in MRI (see `VM_METHOD_TYPE_IVAR`). Since local and instance variables can't end with `?`, you can't use `attr_reader` to define predicate-style methods for boolean values, like: ```ruby class Person attr_reader(:name, :age, :active?) # invalid attribute name `active?' (NameError) def initialize @name = "Bob" @age = 30 @active = true end end ``` It would be nice if `attr_reader` (and friends) could behave like: ```ruby def active? = @active ``` (`attr_writer` and `attr_accessor` couldn't do the same, since `def active?=(new_value)` isn't valid, so they'd probably stick with `def active=(new_value)`) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 7

[ruby-core:116083] [Ruby master Feature#20163] Introduce #bit_count method on Integer
by garrison (Garrison Jensen) 10 Jul '26

10 Jul '26

Issue #20163 has been reported by garrison (Garrison Jensen). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20163: Introduce #bit_count method on Integer https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20163 * Author: garrison (Garrison Jensen) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- This feature request is to implement a method called #bit_count on Integer that returns the number of ones in the binary representation of the absolute value of the integer. ``` n = 19 n.bit_count #=> 3 (-n).bit_count #=> 3 ``` This is often useful when you use an integer as a bitmask and want to count how many bits are set. This would be equivalent to ``` n.to_s(2).count("1") ``` However, this can be outperformed by ``` def bit_count(n) count = 0 while n > 0 n &= n - 1 # Flip the least significant 1 bit to 0 count += 1 end count end ``` I think this would be a useful addition because it would fit alongside the other bit-related methods defined on integer: `#bit_length,` `#allbits?`, `#anybits?`, `#nobits?`. Also, when working with bitmasks, a minor upgrade to performance often results in a significant improvement. Similar methods from other languages: https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#int.bit_count https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i32.html#method.count_ones -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

14 32

[ruby-core:111678] [Ruby master Feature#19315] Lazy substrings in CRuby
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

Issue #19315 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19315: Lazy substrings in CRuby https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19315 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- CRuby should implement lazy substrings, i.e., "abcdef"[1..3] must not copy bytes. Currently CRuby only reuse the char* if the substring is until the end of the buffer. But it should also work wherever the substring starts and ends. Yes, it means RSTRING_PTR() might need to allocate to \0-terminate, so be it, it's worth it. There is already code for this (`SHARABLE_MIDDLE_SUBSTRING`), but it's disabled by default and `RSTRING_PTR()` needs to be changed to deal with this. It seems a good idea to introduce a variant of `RSTRING_PTR` which doesn't guarantee \0-termination, so such callers can then use the existing bytes always without copy. There are countless workarounds for this missing optimization, all not worth and all less readable: * https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19314 * https://github.com/ruby/net-protocol/pull/14 * Manual lazy substrings which track string + index + length * More but I don't remember all now, feel free to comment or link more urls/tickets. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

10 50

[ruby-core:115879] [Ruby master Bug#20081] Transfered Fiber doesn't return to Fiber that started it
by rmosolgo (Robert Mosolgo) 01 Jul '26

01 Jul '26

Issue #20081 has been reported by rmosolgo (Robert Mosolgo). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20081: Transfered Fiber doesn't return to Fiber that started it https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20081 * Author: rmosolgo (Robert Mosolgo) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-darwin22] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi! I'm trying to figure out how to make sure that Fibers started with `.transfer` end up _terminated_, not just suspended. (If they're suspended, Rails thinks they're still alive, and they continue to hold onto database connections, see: https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/4739#issuecomment-1866930914.) So, I'm looking for way to make sure that any Fiber I start with `.transfer` will be properly terminated. But what I noticed is that when a transfer-based Fiber terminates, it gives control back to the top-most Fiber, not the Fiber which transfered to it. Is this intended? Here's a script to replicate the issue: ```ruby manager = Fiber.new do parent = Fiber.current worker = Fiber.new do puts "2. Begin Worker" parent.transfer puts "4. End Worker" end puts "1. Transfer 1" worker.transfer puts "3. Transfer 2" worker.transfer puts "5. Finished manager" end manager.transfer puts "6. Finished script" ``` I expect the steps to print in order: ``` 1. Transfer 1 2. Begin Worker 3. Transfer 2 4. End Worker 5. Finished manager 6. Finished script ``` But instead, `5. ...` is skipped: ``` 1. Transfer 1 2. Begin Worker 3. Transfer 2 4. End Worker 6. Finished script ``` I think that's because my `worker` fiber terminates and passes control back to the top-level Fiber. Should it have passed control back to the `manager`? Or is there another way to make sure `worker` is terminated, and `manager` gets control? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 9

[ruby-core:116949] [Ruby master Misc#20303] Troubleshooting Guide for Common Issues with GMC Acadia
by adamrojas (Adam Rojas) 23 Jun '26

23 Jun '26

Issue #20303 has been reported by adamrojas (Adam Rojas). ---------------------------------------- Misc #20303: Troubleshooting Guide for Common Issues with GMC Acadia https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20303 * Author: adamrojas (Adam Rojas) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Owning a GMC Acadia brings numerous benefits, yet like any vehicle, it may encounter issues. In this guide, we’ll delve into common problems reported by GMC Acadia owners and offer effective solutions. ![Troubleshooting Guide for Common Issues with GMC Acadia](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/troublesho… Whether you’re dealing with transmission faults, engine light codes, or other issues, we’ve got you covered. ## **Troubles with Transmission and Check Engine Light:** ![Troubles with Transmission and Check Engine Light](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/troubles-wi… One significant challenge faced by GMC Acadia owners revolves around transmission faults, often accompanied by the illumination of the check engine light. This issue, reported by numerous individuals, demands prompt attention to prevent further complications. Seeking assistance from experienced professionals is recommended to diagnose and address these transmission-related concerns effectively, ensuring the continued reliability and performance of your vehicle. ## **Interpreting Check Engine Light Codes:** ![Interpreting Check Engine Light Codes](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/interpretin… Another common issue encountered by GMC Acadia owners involves the activation of the check engine light, often accompanied by specific diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs). Understanding these codes is essential for identifying underlying issues promptly. Seeking assistance from a qualified mechanic for thorough diagnostics and appropriate remedies is advised to prevent potential engine damage and ensure continued vehicle reliability. ## **Addressing Gas Cap Concerns and Check Engine Light Illumination:** ![Addressing Gas Cap Concerns and Check Engine Light Illumination](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/addr… Another area of concern for GMC Acadia owners involves issues related to the gas cap, which can lead to the illumination of the check engine light. This problem, while less common, should not be overlooked. It’s important to ensure the gas cap is securely tightened to prevent evaporation and maintain proper fuel system pressure. If the check engine light persists after verifying the gas cap’s tightness, seeking assistance from a qualified technician is advisable to diagnose and resolve any underlying issues effectively. ## **Navigating GMC Acadia Electrical Issues:** ![Navigating GMC Acadia Electrical Issues](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/navigating… Electrical problems can pose significant challenges for GMC Acadia owners, affecting various systems within the vehicle. These issues might manifest as malfunctioning lights, power window failures, intermittent electrical failures, or battery drainage concerns. Addressing electrical problems promptly is crucial to prevent further complications and ensure the safety and functionality of your Acadia. Seeking assistance from experienced technicians equipped with diagnostic tools and expertise in automotive electrical systems is essential for accurately identifying and resolving these issues, restoring your vehicle’s performance and reliability. ## **Essential Maintenance Tasks for GMC Acadia Owners:** ![Essential Maintenance Tasks for GMC Acadia Owners](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/essential-… Beyond adhering to scheduled maintenance, there are fundamental tasks that every GMC Acadia owner should prioritize. These include: **1. Regular Brake Fluid Flushes:** To uphold braking effectiveness, it’s crucial to schedule regular brake fluid flushes. This process helps prevent contaminants from compromising the brake system’s performance, ensuring optimal safety on the road. **2. Transmission Inspections:** Regular inspections of the transmission are essential for early detection of potential issues. By identifying any signs of wear or malfunction early on, owners can mitigate the risk of costly repairs and ensure smooth operation of their Acadia. **3. Coolant Inspections:** Preventing overheating is vital for maintaining engine health. Regular coolant inspections help owners monitor coolant levels and quality, ensuring proper engine temperature regulation and preventing potential damage due to overheating. **4. Spark Plug Replacements:** Spark plugs play a critical role in engine performance by igniting the air-fuel mixture in the cylinders. Replacing worn-out spark plugs at recommended intervals helps maintain fuel efficiency, prevent misfires, and ensure optimal engine performance. ## **Expert Tips for GMC Acadia Owners:** ![Expert Tips for GMC Acadia Owners](https://autorepairandservice.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/expert-tip… Routine inspections and preventive measures are key to maintaining your GMC Acadia’s performance and longevity. Beyond addressing specific issues and adhering to maintenance schedules, here are some expert tips to keep your vehicle running smoothly: **1. Driving Habits Matter:** Be mindful of your driving habits to minimize wear and tear on your Acadia. Avoid sudden acceleration or braking whenever possible, and practice smooth, gradual maneuvers to reduce strain on the engine, transmission, and other vital components. **2. Stay Informed and Educated:** Stay updated on recalls, service bulletins, and manufacturer recommendations for your GMC Acadia. Joining online forums or communities dedicated to GMC owners can provide valuable insights and tips from fellow enthusiasts and experts. Keeping yourself informed empowers you to make informed decisions about your vehicle’s care and maintenance. By incorporating these expert tips into your maintenance routine, you can ensure that your GMC Acadia remains reliable, efficient, and enjoyable to drive for miles to come. ## **Conclusion:** Being aware of common GMC Acadia issues and following proper maintenance practices can ensure trouble-free ownership. Promptly addressing problems through professional diagnosis and repair, along with adhering to recommended maintenance intervals, can help maintain a reliable and enjoyable driving experience. Thank you for reading this post. If you're looking for a car specialist to opt for a [cheap plastic bumper repair in Manchester](https://servicemycar.com/uk/services/car-bumper-repair-manchest…. So, you can connect with Service My Car and get the best car dent service at a very reasonable price. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 2

[ruby-core:115165] [Ruby master Bug#19972] Install default/bundled gems into dedicated directories
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 15 Jun '26

15 Jun '26

Issue #19972 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19972: Install default/bundled gems into dedicated directories https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19972 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-10-24 master c44d65427e) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I think that the current situation, where the same directory (lets call it `Gem.default_dir`) is used for default/bundled gems as well as for user installed gems, is suboptimal. During the times, this has caused us quite some issue on Fedora. Historically, we redefined the `Gem.default_dir` to user home directory, to avoid the mixing of system gems and user installed gems. Unfortunately, with advent of default/bundled gems, we were facing issues that these gems were suddenly not listed, etc. I am realizing this issue in full once again since the "user install" RubyGems feature has landed [1]. I also think that we have arrived to this situation by evolution, not by design. Therefore my proposal is: Keep the `Gem.default_dir` for user `gem install`ed gems and lets install default and bundled gems into separate dedicated directories. Have separate `Gem.bundled_gems_dir` and `Gem.default_gems_dir` structures. Of course, if `Gem.default_dir == Gem.bundled_gems_dir == Gem.default_gems_dir`, we still can have the current layout. I have a simple POC here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8761 BTW I have reported it here, because I think that RubyGems provides all it is needed. So it is not RubyGems ticket after all. However, I believe that RubyGems could benefit from this long term and some simplifications/cleanups would be possible. [1]: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 11