ruby-core

Download

ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org

October 2024

6 participants
192 discussions

[ruby-core:119331] [Ruby master Feature#20768] Add Hash#delete_at
by seanpdoyle (Sean Doyle) 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

Issue #20768 has been reported by seanpdoyle (Sean Doyle). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20768: Add Hash#delete_at https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20768 * Author: seanpdoyle (Sean Doyle) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Add `Hash#delete_at` to delete values from a list keyed by its arguments. The interface and return values draw inspiration from [Hash#values_at](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.3/Hash.html#method-i-values… and [Array#delete_at](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.3/Array.html#method-i-dele…. It can pair nicely with multiple assignment to deconstruct a `Hash` instance: ```ruby hash = { a: true, b: false } a, c = hash.delete_at(:a, :c) # => [ true, nil ] hash # => { b: false } ``` Similar outcomes can be achieved with rightward assignment: ```ruby hash = { a: true, b: false } hash => { a:, **rest } a # => true rest # => { b: false } ``` However, rightward assignment will raise an error when a key is missing, whereas `Hash#delete_at` could return `nil` or the `Hash#default_value`: ```ruby hash => { c: } # => raises NoMatchingPatternKeyError ``` Similarly, rightward assignment does not mutate the original `Hash` instance. In some circumstances, this is beneficial. However, others that require mutation would involve re-assigning the variable: ```ruby hash => { a:, **hash } a # => true hash # => { b:false } ``` Finally, a block can be passed in the same style as [Hash#delete](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.3/Hash.html#method-i-delete) to provide a default value: ```ruby attributes = { disabled: true, aria: { label: "label text" } } aria, data = attributes.delete_at(:aria, :data) { Hash.new } attributes # => { disabled: true } aria # => { label: "label text" } data # => {} ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:119356] [Ruby master Bug#20773] CI of RHEL8 and Amazon Linux 2 are failed from Sep 26th
by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Issue #20773 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20773: CI of RHEL8 and Amazon Linux 2 are failed from Sep 26th https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20773 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- RHEL8 and Amazon Linux 2 are failed with `Cannot allocate memory - fork(2)` from Sep 26th. * http://rubyci.s3.amazonaws.com/rhel8/ruby-master/log/20240926T093004Z.fail.… * http://rubyci.s3.amazonaws.com/amazon2/ruby-master/log/20240926T033004Z.fai… I'm not sure what's the root cause yet. Amazon Linux 2 is resolved with swapon by @mame. These are strange to increase to usage of memory only for some old distribution. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 1

Jump to page: