July 2024 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:118431] [Ruby master Bug#20606] Thread#thread_variable_get, Thread#thread_variable? and Thread#[] methods handle non-String/Symbol parameter values differently
by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) 05 Jul '24

05 Jul '24

Issue #20606 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20606: Thread#thread_variable_get, Thread#thread_variable? and Thread#[] methods handle non-String/Symbol parameter values differently https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20606 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 3.2.4 * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The `Thread#thread_variable_get`, `Thread#thread_variable?` and `Thread#[]` methods handle the `key` parameter that is not a String or a Symbol in different way but I would expect them to be consistent. When no thread-local variables were assigned to a thread the `Thread#thread_variable_get` and `Thread#thread_variable?` methods don't raise `TypeError` when argument is of incorrect type. But `Thread#[]` does raise `TypeError` exception: ```ruby t = Thread.new {}.join puts t.thread_variable_get(123).inspect # nil puts t.thread_variable?(123).inspect # false t[123] # `[]': 123 is not a symbol nor a string (TypeError) ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 4

[ruby-core:118444] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 04 Jul '24

04 Jul '24

Issue #18061 has been updated by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). fweimer (Florian Weimer) wrote in #note-48: > The change in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11081/files does not look correct to me because it enables shadow stack and indirect branch tracking in the ELF markup. But the changes to `Context.S` merely enable indirect branch tracking markup. The shadow stack is not context-switched, so this will crash on the `ret` instruction. So either the metadata should signal just IBT or the shadow stack needs to be implemented, right? ---------------------------------------- Bug #18061: Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-108959 * Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga) * Status: Assigned * Assignee: kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2]. ``` Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found ``` Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb, ``` $ autoconf $ ./configure --enable-shared $ make $ ls libruby.so.3.1.0 libruby.so.3.1.0* ``` If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this. ``` $ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck ``` ``` $ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck ``` Then ``` $ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0 ``` If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared. Prepare the following `Dockerfile`. ``` $ cat Dockerfile FROM docker.io/fedora:34 RUN cat /etc/fedora-release RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck WORKDIR /work ``` Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment. ``` $ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck . $ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0 annocheck: Version 9.79. Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. ``` The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build. Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine… cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks. * [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/ * [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck . ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB) 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB) config-pie.log (11.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

[ruby-core:118440] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
by fweimer (Florian Weimer) 04 Jul '24

04 Jul '24

Issue #18061 has been updated by fweimer (Florian Weimer). The change in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11081/files does not look correct to me because it enables shadow stack and indirect branch tracking in the ELF markup. But the changes to `Context.S` merely enable indirect branch tracking markup. The shadow stack is not context-switched, so this will crash on the `ret` instruction. ---------------------------------------- Bug #18061: Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-108955 * Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga) * Status: Assigned * Assignee: kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2]. ``` Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found ``` Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb, ``` $ autoconf $ ./configure --enable-shared $ make $ ls libruby.so.3.1.0 libruby.so.3.1.0* ``` If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this. ``` $ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck ``` ``` $ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck ``` Then ``` $ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0 ``` If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared. Prepare the following `Dockerfile`. ``` $ cat Dockerfile FROM docker.io/fedora:34 RUN cat /etc/fedora-release RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck WORKDIR /work ``` Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment. ``` $ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck . $ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0 annocheck: Version 9.79. Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. ``` The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build. Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine… cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks. * [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/ * [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck . ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB) 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB) config-pie.log (11.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

[ruby-core:118439] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 04 Jul '24

04 Jul '24

Issue #18061 has been updated by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ioquatix (Samuel Williams) wrote in #note-46: > BTW, IIUC, if we can use CET instead of the shadow stack, it's a far simpler and more efficient solution, so I'm strongly in favour of that direction (assuming it's viable). If I understand correctly, CET are two things: shadow stack and indirect branch tracking. My proposal is to improve the IBT implementation, which seems to be enough to make the annocheck happy. I still think that exploring the shadow stack would be worth of the effort. If nothing else, the shadow stack was quite often mentioned during the frame pointer discussions [1]. Therefore it would probably make sense to extract this part into separate ticket and try to finalize your PR in the future. @fweimer do you have by a chance any thought on this topic? [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer ---------------------------------------- Bug #18061: Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-108954 * Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga) * Status: Assigned * Assignee: kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2]. ``` Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found ``` Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb, ``` $ autoconf $ ./configure --enable-shared $ make $ ls libruby.so.3.1.0 libruby.so.3.1.0* ``` If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this. ``` $ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck ``` ``` $ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck ``` Then ``` $ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0 ``` If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared. Prepare the following `Dockerfile`. ``` $ cat Dockerfile FROM docker.io/fedora:34 RUN cat /etc/fedora-release RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck WORKDIR /work ``` Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment. ``` $ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck . $ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0 annocheck: Version 9.79. Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. ``` The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build. Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine… cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks. * [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/ * [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck . ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB) 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB) config-pie.log (11.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

[ruby-core:118438] [Cloudflare]: Verify Email Routing address
by Cloudflare 04 Jul '24

04 Jul '24

Hello, Verify this Email Routing address to begin receiving forwarded emails by clicking the verify email address link Account Name: Ruby Association https://dash.cloudflare.com/email_fwdr/verify?token=Y_FwyAwMnnUdr24wStWYyie… Once you have verified this email address, manage your Email Routing addresses at https://dash.cloudflare.com/?to=/:account/:zone/email We appreciate your help in building a better Internet. Thank you, Cloudflare If you believe you received this email in error, please contact dash.cloudflare.com/support

1 0

[ruby-core:118437] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Issue #18061 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). BTW, IIUC, if we can use CET instead of the shadow stack, it's a far simpler and more efficient solution, so I'm strongly in favour of that direction (assuming it's viable). ---------------------------------------- Bug #18061: Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-108953 * Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga) * Status: Assigned * Assignee: kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2]. ``` Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found ``` Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb, ``` $ autoconf $ ./configure --enable-shared $ make $ ls libruby.so.3.1.0 libruby.so.3.1.0* ``` If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this. ``` $ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck ``` ``` $ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck ``` Then ``` $ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0 ``` If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared. Prepare the following `Dockerfile`. ``` $ cat Dockerfile FROM docker.io/fedora:34 RUN cat /etc/fedora-release RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck WORKDIR /work ``` Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment. ``` $ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck . $ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0 annocheck: Version 9.79. Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. ``` The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build. Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine… cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks. * [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/ * [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck . ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB) 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB) config-pie.log (11.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

[ruby-core:118436] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Issue #18061 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). Thanks, I agree with your proposed change. ---------------------------------------- Bug #18061: Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-108952 * Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga) * Status: Assigned * Assignee: kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2]. ``` Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found ``` Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb, ``` $ autoconf $ ./configure --enable-shared $ make $ ls libruby.so.3.1.0 libruby.so.3.1.0* ``` If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this. ``` $ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck ``` ``` $ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck ``` Then ``` $ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0 ``` If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared. Prepare the following `Dockerfile`. ``` $ cat Dockerfile FROM docker.io/fedora:34 RUN cat /etc/fedora-release RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck WORKDIR /work ``` Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment. ``` $ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck . $ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0 annocheck: Version 9.79. Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. ``` The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build. Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine… cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks. * [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/ * [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck . ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB) 0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB) config-pie.log (11.4 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

1 0

[ruby-core:118398] [Ruby master Bug#20597] `eval('break if false')` should raise SyntaxError but retuns nil
by tompng (tomoya ishida) 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Issue #20597 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20597: `eval('break if false')` should raise SyntaxError but retuns nil https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20597 * Author: tompng (tomoya ishida) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-06-27T13:47:22Z master c6a0d03649) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- These are all SyntaxError (Invalid break, compile error (SyntaxError)) ~~~ruby ruby -ce "break if false" ruby -ce "break if (false)" ruby -ce "break if nil" ruby -ce "break if (nil)" ruby -ce "break if 0>1" ~~~ But when it is passed to `eval`, some of them does not raise SyntaxError but return nil. ~~~ruby eval('break if false') #=> nil eval('break if (false)') #=> nil eval('break if nil') #=> nil eval('break if (nil)') #=> Can't escape from eval with break (SyntaxError) eval('break if 0>1') #=> Can't escape from eval with break (SyntaxError) ~~~ Same behavior with `next` `redo` and `yield` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:118432] [Ruby master Bug#20607] Exception messages are inconsistent when thread-local variables are accessed
by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Issue #20607 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20607: Exception messages are inconsistent when thread-local variables are accessed https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20607 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 3.2.4 * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `Thread`'s methods to manipulate thread-local variables raise `TypeError` exceptions with slightly different messages when the `key` argument is not a String or a Symbol. The message is either `is not a symbol` or `is not a symbol nor a string`. As far as both String and Symbol arguments are correct it seems the `is not a symbol nor a string` message is more accurate and should be used consistently. The following methods raise `is not a symbol` error: ```ruby @t.thread_variable_set(:a, 0) # for some methods it's important to have some thread-local variables assigned @t.thread_variable_get(123) # => 123 is not a symbol (TypeError) t.thread_variable_set(123, 1) # => 123 is not a symbol (TypeError) t.thread_variable?(123) # => 123 is not a symbol (TypeError) t[123] = 1 # => 123 is not a symbol (TypeError) ``` The following methods raise `is not a symbol nor a string` error: ```ruby t.fetch(123) # => 123 is not a symbol nor a string (TypeError) t.key?(123) # => 123 is not a symbol nor a string (TypeError) t[123] # => 123 is not a symbol nor a string (TypeError) ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:118415] [Ruby master Bug#20601] Configuration flags are not properly propagated to assembler
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 03 Jul '24

03 Jul '24

Issue #20601 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20601: Configuration flags are not properly propagated to assembler https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20601 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.2 (2024-05-30 revision e5a195edf6) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Looking into #18061, one of the issues is that the `.S` files are not processed with the correct flags. For example to have the CET enabled, the `-fcf-protection` should be used to preprocess the `coroutine/amd64/Context.S`. First I thought there is something wrong on Fedora side, therefore I have proposed to export the `ASFLAGS` [1]. However, as it turns out, `$(ASFLAGS)` are used by GNU make default rule and passed to `$(AS)`. And indeed, Ruby had historically override of this rule, but it does not do this anymore since: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/091422388e943de1e67ace6faac3d71ed08c14d2 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/42575570a908aac979a80b89266804c4c688dd7c As can be seen, while previously `$(AS)` was used to process the `.s` file, it was replaced by the compiler. This however means that the `.S` files are not preprocessed with the `$(CFLAGS)`, which contains `-fcf-protection`. [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293107 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 6