April 2026 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:124474] [Ruby Bug#21831] Prism doesn't count underscores in the fraction part of rational float
by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 07 Jun '26

07 Jun '26

Issue #21831 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21831: Prism doesn't count underscores in the fraction part of rational float https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21831 * Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: REQUIRED, 3.3: REQUIRED, 3.4: REQUIRED, 4.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- Good. ```console $ ruby3.3 -e 'p 0.1_2r.to_f' 0.12 $ ruby3.4 --parser=parse.y -e 'p 0.1_2r.to_f' 0.12 ``` Wrong. ```console $ ruby3.4 -e 'p 0.1_2r.to_f' 0.012 ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 3

[ruby-core:125083] [Ruby Misc#21960] Improve #backtrace to not confuse terminals
by svoop (Sven Schwyn) 05 Jun '26

05 Jun '26

Issue #21960 has been reported by svoop (Sven Schwyn). ---------------------------------------- Misc #21960: Improve #backtrace to not confuse terminals https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21960 * Author: svoop (Sven Schwyn) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- The `#backtrace` of exceptions are currently printed like so: ``` /path/to/whatever.rb:8:in `/' /path/to/whatever.rb:8:in `show' (...) ``` Most terminals recognize `/path/to/whatever.rb:8` as a local file and make it clickable as "open in editor", however, some (e.g. Ghostty) include everything up to the next whitespace, in this case `/path/to/whatever.rb:8:in`. This is then used as an argument to `open` (on macOS) which will not work due to the `:in` part. There are two ways to improve this: ## Replace the colon with a space Given the existence of `#backtrace_locations` which is better suited for programmatically working with backtrace locations, it should not break things to slightly modify the `#backtrace` to look like this: ``` /path/to/whatever.rb:8 in `/' /path/to/whatever.rb:8 in `show' (...) ^^^ space instead of colon ``` ## Add OCS 8 sequences [OCS 8](https://github.com/Alhadis/OSC8-Adoption) are the `<a>` tag for terminal output. While many terminals support it, it might cause visual noise in logs and therefore would have to be an opt-in feature e.g. via a Ruby interpreter argument. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

8 17

[ruby-core:125373] [Ruby Bug#22017] Backport win32-resolv
by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 24 May '26

24 May '26

Issue #22017 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). ---------------------------------------- Bug #22017: Backport win32-resolv https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/22017 * Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Status: Closed * Backport: 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: REQUIRED, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The win32-resolv library bundled with ruby 3.4 is half-baked 0.6.2. It should be updated to 0.6.3 at least, hopefully 0.7.1. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:125099] [Ruby Bug#21961] Marshal.load freeze option fail to free linked strings
by byroot (Jean Boussier) 23 May '26

23 May '26

Issue #21961 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21961: Marshal.load freeze option fail to free linked strings https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21961 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: WONTFIX, 3.3: REQUIRED, 3.4: REQUIRED, 4.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- ```ruby str = "test" arr = [str, str] strings = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(arr), freeze: true) p strings.map(&:frozen?) # => [true, false] ``` Expected: `[true, true]` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 3

[ruby-core:125078] [Ruby Bug#21959] rb_internal_thread_event_hooks_rw_lock is not reinitialized after fork causing deadlocks
by anmarchenko_datadog (Andrey Marchenko) 23 May '26

23 May '26

Issue #21959 has been reported by anmarchenko_datadog (Andrey Marchenko). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21959: rb_internal_thread_event_hooks_rw_lock is not reinitialized after fork causing deadlocks https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21959 * Author: anmarchenko_datadog (Andrey Marchenko) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 4.0.1 * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Ruby's GVL Instrumentation API uses a read-write lock (rb_internal_thread_event_hooks_rw_lock) to protect the list of thread event hooks: - Read lock — acquired on every GVL transition to iterate and call hook callbacks (rb_thread_execute_hooks) - Write lock — acquired when adding/removing hooks (rb_internal_thread_add_event_hook, rb_internal_thread_remove_event_hook) After fork(), Ruby reinitializes several internal locks (e.g. vm->ractor.sched.lock, timer_th.waiting_lock), but not rb_internal_thread_event_hooks_rw_lock. This wasn't added with the GVL Instrumentation API. The full reproducer is available here: https://github.com/anmarchenko/ruby-locks-fork-bug ## Deadlock sequence 1. Parent process has thread event hooks registered (e.g. by a profiler like dd-trace-rb) 2. Multiple threads run concurrently, causing GVL transitions — each transition acquires a read lock on the rwlock 3. fork() happens while a thread holds the read lock 4. In the child, only the forking thread survives — the thread that held the lock is gone, but the lock state is copied as-is 5. Child tries to add or remove a hook → needs write lock → blocks forever on a lock that will never be released 6. Deadlock ## Impact This affects any Ruby C extension using the GVL Instrumentation API in combination with fork-based servers (Resque, Unicorn, Passenger, etc.). The original report comes from dd-trace-rb's profiler deadlocking Resque workers on Alpine Linux (musl libc): https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/issues/4967 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 5

[ruby-core:125209] [Ruby Bug#21985] RubyVM::AST negative numbers do not include - in location
by kddnewton (Kevin Newton) 23 May '26

23 May '26

Issue #21985 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21985: RubyVM::AST negative numbers do not include - in location https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21985 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ``` irb(main):007> RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree.parse("-1") => (SCOPE@1:0-1:2 tbl: [] args: nil body: (INTEGER@1:1-1:2 -1)) irb(main):008> ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 2

[ruby-core:124887] [Ruby Bug#21926] Thread#value on popen3 wait thread hangs in finalizer
by stevecrozz (Stephen Crosby) 23 May '26

23 May '26

Issue #21926 has been reported by stevecrozz (Stephen Crosby). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21926: Thread#value on popen3 wait thread hangs in finalizer https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21926 * Author: stevecrozz (Stephen Crosby) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 3.3.7 * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Calling Thread#value on an Open3.popen3 wait thread from a finalizer completes in Ruby 3.2 but hangs in Ruby 3.3+. See repro.rb below. When the Ruby process hangs in these conditions, it no longer responds to signals and it seems to be unable to run any other threads. This affects the schmooze gem (and potentially other code using Open3.popen3 with finalizers), causing test suites to hang intermittently. ``` ruby # repro.rb require 'open3' class ProcessWrapper def initialize @stdin, @stdout, @stderr, @wait_thread = Open3.popen3("cat") ObjectSpace.define_finalizer(self, self.class.make_finalizer(@stdin, @stdout, @stderr, @wait_thread)) end def self.make_finalizer(stdin, stdout, stderr, wait_thread) proc do stdin.close rescue nil stdout.close rescue nil stderr.close rescue nil wait_thread.value # Hangs here in Ruby 3.3+ end end end 100.times { ProcessWrapper.new } GC.stress = true 1000.times { Object.new } puts "done" ``` ## Environment - Linux x86_64 - Tested on Ruby 3.2.7, 3.3.7, 3.4.8 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 5

[ruby-core:124594] [Ruby Bug#21844] Inconsistent ArgumentError message for Data::define.new
by jnchito (Junichi Ito) 20 May '26

20 May '26

Issue #21844 has been reported by jnchito (Junichi Ito). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21844: Inconsistent ArgumentError message for Data::define.new https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21844 * Author: jnchito (Junichi Ito) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 4.0.1 (2026-01-13 revision e04267a14b) +PRISM [arm64-darwin25] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The code below shows `Data::define.new` treats symbol and string keys equivalently: ``` ruby C = Data.define(:a, :b) C.new(a: 1, b: 1) #=> #<data C a=1, b=1> C.new('a' => 1, 'b' => 1) #=> #<data C a=1, b=1> ``` But it acts differently when detecting missing keywords: ```ruby C.new(a: 1) #=> 'Data#initialize': missing keyword: :b (ArgumentError) C.new('a' => 1) #=> 'Data#initialize': missing keywords: :a, :b (ArgumentError) ``` I feel it should work like this: ```ruby C.new('a' => 1) #=> 'Data#initialize': missing keyword: :b (ArgumentError) ``` I created a PR to fix it: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15910 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 14

[ruby-core:124286] [Ruby Bug#21789] `IO#flush` doesn't invoke fiber scheduler io_write hook
by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) 16 May '26

16 May '26

Issue #21789 has been reported by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21789: `IO#flush` doesn't invoke fiber scheduler io_write hook https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21789 * Author: noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When calling `IO#flush` or closing an IO with unflushed writes, the flushing is done by calling `rb_io_blocking_region_wait` and eventually doing a `write` system call. When done in a non-blocking fiber with an active fiber scheduler, this will invoke the `#blocking_operation_wait` fiber scheduler hook, which will run the system call in a worker thread, and therefore the flushing bypasses the async I/O capabilities of the fiber scheduler. The proposed fix is to test for the presence of a fiber scheduler in `io_flush_buffer_async` and invoke the `#io_write` fiber scheduler hook with the unflushed part of the IO's write buffer. Associated PR here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15609 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:111146] [Ruby master Bug#19172] `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` is innacurate sometimes -- document or change?
by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 15 May '26

15 May '26

Issue #19172 has been reported by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19172: `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` is innacurate sometimes -- document or change? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19172 * Author: ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: (All Ruby versions) * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Howdy 👋! I work for Datadog [on the ddtrace gem](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb) and I found a... sharp edge on the internal `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` API. I am aware that `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` is documented an experimental API that is exported as a symbol but not present on the VM include files. ### Background In the ddtrace profiling component, we setup a signal handler and then periodically send SIGPROF signals to try to interrupt the running Ruby thread (e.g. the thread that is holding the global VM lock or equivalent). In the signal handler, we need to perform some API calls which are not safe to do without the GVL. So we need to check if the signal handler got called in the thread that has the GVL. ### The issue ```ruby int ruby_thread_has_gvl_p(void) { rb_thread_t *th = ruby_thread_from_native(); if (th && th->blocking_region_buffer == 0) { return 1; } else { return 0; } } ``` In its current implementation, `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` only checks if the thread has a `blocking_region_buffer` or not. Unfortunately, this means that when called from a thread that lost the GVL but not due to blocking (e.g. via `rb_thread_schedule()`), it can still claim that a thread is holding the GVL when that is not the case. I ran into this issue in https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/pull/2415, and needed to find a workaround. ### Next steps Since this is an internal VM API, I'm not sure you'd want to change the current behavior, so I was thinking of perhaps two options: * Is it worth changing `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` to be accurate in the case I've listed? * If not, would you accept a PR to document its current limitations, so that others don't run into the same issue I did? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3