ml.ruby-lang.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

ruby-core

Thread Start a new thread
Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org

  • 5 participants
  • 3281 discussions
[ruby-core:111714] [Ruby master Bug#19005] Ruby interpreter compiled XCode 14 cannot build some native gems on macOS
by stanhu (Stan Hu) 07 Jan '23

07 Jan '23
Issue #19005 has been updated by stanhu (Stan Hu). Status changed from Discussion to Closed Ok, I see this was reported in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19082. ---------------------------------------- Bug #19005: Ruby interpreter compiled XCode 14 cannot build some native gems on macOS https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19005#change-101112 * Author: stanhu (Stan Hu) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 2.7.6p219 (2022-04-12 revision 44c8bfa984) [arm64-darwin21] * Backport: 2.7: DONE, 3.0: DONE, 3.1: DONE ---------------------------------------- This seems related to https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18912 and https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18981 . Steps to reproduce: 1. Upgrade to XCode 14. 2. Compile a new Ruby interpreter. I used the version provided in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6297 with `./configure --prefix=/tmp/ruby --with-openssl-dir=$(brew --prefix openssl(a)1.1) --with-readline-dir=$(brew --prefix readline) --enable-shared`. 3. Confirm that `-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup` is no longer available: ``` irb(main):001:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['DLDFLAGS'] => "-Wl,-multiply_defined,suppress" ``` 4. Ran `gem install pg_query` (`gem install ffi-yajl` will also fail). Error: ``` linking shared-object pg_query/pg_query.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture arm64: "Init_pg_query", referenced from: -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option (maybe you meant: _Init_pg_query) ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64 clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) ``` I can workaround the problem by doing: ``` gem install pg_query -- --with-ldflags="-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111713] [Ruby master Bug#19005] Ruby interpreter compiled XCode 14 cannot build some native gems on macOS
by stanhu (Stan Hu) 07 Jan '23

07 Jan '23
Issue #19005 has been updated by stanhu (Stan Hu). I think this problem was "accidentally" fixed in Ruby 2.7.7 and 3.0.5, but it's not working in Ruby 3.1.3 and up due to a simple removal of a dollar sign (https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/667aa81219ca080c0a4b9f97d29bb3221bd08a33) In Ruby 3.1.3, I'm not seeing the `ADDITIONAL_DLDFLAGS` set with `-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup`: ```ruby irb(main):001:0> RUBY_VERSION => "3.1.3" irb(main):002:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['ADDITIONAL_DLDFLAGS'] => "" ``` Whereas 3.0.5 has this: ```ruby irb(main):001:0> RUBY_VERSION => "3.0.5" irb(main):002:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['ADDITIONAL_DLDFLAGS'] => "-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" ``` If I look at the `./configure` output in Ruby 3.0.5 or 2.7.7, I see something like this: ``` checking whether -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is accepted as LDFLAGS... ./configure: line 29806: -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup=: command not found checking whether -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is accepted for bundle... no ``` But with 3.1.3 and up, the `LDFLAGS` check is a straight no: ``` checking whether -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is accepted as LDFLAGS... no ``` The `configure` output with Ruby 3.0.5 looks like: ``` if ac_fn_c_try_link "$LINENO" then : { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: yes" >&5 printf "%s\n" "${msg_result_yes}yes${msg_reset}" >&6 ; } else $as_nop $flag= { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 printf "%s\n" "${msg_result_no}no${msg_reset}" >&6 ; } fi ``` The failing line in question is `$flag=`. In Ruby 3.1.3 and up, it appears `$flag=` has been replaced with `flag=` due to https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/667aa81219ca080c0a4b9f97d29bb3221bd08a33: ``` if ac_fn_c_try_link "$LINENO" then : { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: yes" >&5 printf "%s\n" "${msg_result_yes}yes${msg_reset}" >&6 ; } else $as_nop flag= { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 printf "%s\n" "${msg_result_no}no${msg_reset}" >&6 ; } fi ``` ---------------------------------------- Bug #19005: Ruby interpreter compiled XCode 14 cannot build some native gems on macOS https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19005#change-101110 * Author: stanhu (Stan Hu) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 2.7.6p219 (2022-04-12 revision 44c8bfa984) [arm64-darwin21] * Backport: 2.7: DONE, 3.0: DONE, 3.1: DONE ---------------------------------------- This seems related to https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18912 and https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18981 . Steps to reproduce: 1. Upgrade to XCode 14. 2. Compile a new Ruby interpreter. I used the version provided in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6297 with `./configure --prefix=/tmp/ruby --with-openssl-dir=$(brew --prefix openssl(a)1.1) --with-readline-dir=$(brew --prefix readline) --enable-shared`. 3. Confirm that `-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup` is no longer available: ``` irb(main):001:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['DLDFLAGS'] => "-Wl,-multiply_defined,suppress" ``` 4. Ran `gem install pg_query` (`gem install ffi-yajl` will also fail). Error: ``` linking shared-object pg_query/pg_query.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture arm64: "Init_pg_query", referenced from: -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option (maybe you meant: _Init_pg_query) ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64 clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) ``` I can workaround the problem by doing: ``` gem install pg_query -- --with-ldflags="-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111706] [Ruby master Bug#18518] NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large
by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 07 Jan '23

07 Jan '23
Issue #18518 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Status changed from Open to Rejected It is a test for the development branch and unrelated to users using released versions. ---------------------------------------- Bug #18518: NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18518#change-101105 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Repro: ```ruby exp = 2**40 # also fails with bignum e.g. 2**64 def exc begin yield rescue NoMemoryError => e p :NoMemoryError end end p exp exc { (1 << exp) } exc { (-1 << exp) } exc { (bignum_value << exp) } exc { (-bignum_value << exp) } ``` Output: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError [FATAL] failed to allocate memory ``` 3.1.0 seems fine: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.1.0p0 (2021-12-25 revision fb4df44d16) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111704] [Ruby master Bug#18518] NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large
by headius (Charles Nutter) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #18518 has been updated by headius (Charles Nutter). There's no practical reason to support left shift of greater than integer max, so I would support a fast check and RangeError. It would make more sense than just blowing up memory and raising NoMemoryError for something that should never work (1 << (`2**32`) produces a big integer at least 2^29 bytes wide, more than 0.5GB). ---------------------------------------- Bug #18518: NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18518#change-101101 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Repro: ```ruby exp = 2**40 # also fails with bignum e.g. 2**64 def exc begin yield rescue NoMemoryError => e p :NoMemoryError end end p exp exc { (1 << exp) } exc { (-1 << exp) } exc { (bignum_value << exp) } exc { (-bignum_value << exp) } ``` Output: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError [FATAL] failed to allocate memory ``` 3.1.0 seems fine: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.1.0p0 (2021-12-25 revision fb4df44d16) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111432] [Ruby master Bug#19260] ruby/spec is failed with Ruby 3.3
by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #19260 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19260: ruby/spec is failed with Ruby 3.3 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19260 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- After bumping version, we got the some fails with ruby/spec. https://github.com/ruby/ruby/actions/runs/3778576412/jobs/6423166914 ``` 1) Literal Regexps handles a lookbehind with ss characters ERROR RegexpError: invalid pattern in look-behind: /(?<!dss)/i /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/language/regexp_spec.rb:120:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/language/regexp_spec.rb:4:in `<top (required)>' 2) Float#round does not lose precision during the rounding process FAILED Expected 767573.18758 to have same value and type as 767573.18759 /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/core/float/round_spec.rb:148:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/core/float/round_spec.rb:3:in `<top (required)>' 3) Encoding#replicate has been removed FAILED Expected #<Encoding:US-ASCII>.respond_to? :replicate, true to be falsy but was true /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/core/encoding/replicate_spec.rb:72:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' /home/runner/work/ruby/ruby/src/spec/ruby/core/encoding/replicate_spec.rb:4:in `<top (required)>' ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
3 5
0 0
[ruby-core:111702] [Ruby master Bug#18797] Third argument to Regexp.new is a bit broken
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #18797 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). Assignee set to jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) Target version set to 3.3 ---------------------------------------- Bug #18797: Third argument to Regexp.new is a bit broken https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18797#change-101098 * Author: janosch-x (Janosch Müller) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) * Target version: 3.3 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ## Situation 'n' or 'N' can be passed as a third argument to `Regexp.new`. However, the behavior is not the same as the literal `n`-flag or the `Regexp::NOENCODING` option, and it makes the `#encoding` of `Regexp` and `Regexp#source` diverge: ```ruby /😅/n # => SyntaxError Regexp.new('😅', Regexp::NOENCODING) # => RegexpError re = Regexp.new('😅', nil, 'n') # => /😅/ re.options == Regexp::NOENCODING # => true re.encoding # => ASCII-8BIT re.source.encoding # => UTF-8 re =~ '😅' # => Encoding::CompatibilityError ``` ## Code [Here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/b41de3a1e8c36a5cc336b6f7cd3cb71126c…. There is also a test for the resulting encoding [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/cf2bbcfff2985c116552967c7c4522f4630…, but it is a no-op because the whole file is set to that encoding via magic comment anyway. The third argument was added when ASCII was still the default Ruby encoding, so I guess Regexp and source encoding still matched at that point. ## Solution It could be fixed, but my impression is that it is not useful anymore. It was probably only added because `Regexp::NOENCODING` wasn't available at the time, so I think it could be deprecated like so: > Passing a third argument to Regexp.new is deprecated. Use `Regexp::NOENCODING` as second argument instead. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111697] [Ruby master Feature#18949] Deprecate and remove replicate and dummy encodings
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #18949 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). Target version set to 3.3 This is all done now, only https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7079 left and I'll merge that when it passes CI. Overall: * We deprecated and removed `Encoding#replicate` * We removed `get_actual_encoding()` * We limited to 256 encodings and kept `rb_define_dummy_encoding()` with that constraint. * There is a single flat array to lookup encodings, `rb_enc_from_index()` is fast now. Since the limit is 256 and not 128 though it means `ENCODING_GET` is not just `RB_ENCODING_GET_INLINED` but still has the check and slow fallback. Thank you for the discussion, @ko1 for implementing the fixed-size table and let's close this. Of course for all builtin encodings the cost is just the extra check. Maybe the limit could be changed later to 128 if this optimization is wanted. ---------------------------------------- Feature #18949: Deprecate and remove replicate and dummy encodings https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18949#change-101095 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Target version: 3.3 ---------------------------------------- Ruby has a lot of accidental complexity. Sometimes it becomes clear some features bring a lot of complexity and yet provide little value or are used very rarely. Also most Ruby users do not even know about these features. Replicate and dummy encodings seem to clearly fall into this category, almost nobody uses them but they add a significant complexity and also add a significant performance overhead. Notably, the existence of those means the number of encodings in a Ruby runtime is actually variable and not fixed. That means extra synchronization, hashtable lookups, indirections, function calls, etc. ## Replicate Encodings Replicate encodings are created using `Encoding#replicate(name)`. It almost sounds like an alias but in fact it is more than that and creates a new Encoding object, which can be used by a String: ```ruby e = Encoding::US_ASCII.replicate('MY-US-ASCII') s = "abc".force_encoding(e) p s.encoding # => e p s.encoding.name # => 'MY-US-ASCII' ``` This seems completely useless. There is an obvious first step here which is to change `Encoding#replicate` to return the receiver, and just install an alias for it. That avoids creating more encoding instances needlessly. I think we should also deprecate and remove this method though, it is never a good idea to have a global mutable map like this. If someone want extra aliases for encodings, they can easily to do so by having their own Hash: `{ alias => encoding }.fetch(name) { Encoding.find(name) }`. ## Dummy Encodings Dummy encodings are not real encodings. They are artificial encodings designed to look like encodings, but don't function as encodings in Ruby. From the docs: ``` enc.dummy? -> true or false ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Returns true for dummy encodings. A dummy encoding is an encoding for which character handling is not properly implemented. It is used for stateful encodings. ``` I wonder why we have those half-implemented encodings in core, it sounds to me like unfinished work which should not have been merged. The "codepoints" of dummy encodings are just "bytes" and so they behave the same as `Encoding::BINARY`, with the exception of the UTF-16 and UTF-32 dummy encodings. ### UTF-16 and UTF-32 dummy encodings These two are special dummy encodings. What they do is they scan the first 2 or 4 bytes of the String, and if those bytes are a byte-order mark (BOM), the true "actual" encoding is resolved to UTF-16BE/UTF-16LE or UTF-32BE/UTF-32LE. Otherwise, `Encoding::BINARY` is returned. This logic is done by `get_actual_encoding()`. What is weird is this check is not done on String creation, no, it is done *every time* the encoding of that String is accessed (and the result is not stored on the String). That is a needless overhead and really unreliable semantics. Do we really want a String which automagically changes between UTF-16LE and UTF-16BE based on mutating its bytes? I think nobody wants that: ```ruby s = "\xFF\xFEa\x00b\x00c\x00d\x00".force_encoding("UTF-16") p s # => "\uFEFFabcd" s.setbyte 0, 254 s.setbyte 1, 255 p s # => "\uFEFF\u6100\u6200\u6300\u6400" ``` I think the path is clear, we should deprecate and then remove Encoding::UTF_16 and Encoding::UTF_32 (dummy encodings). And then we no longer need `get_actual_encoding()` and the overhead it adds to every String method. We could also keep those constants and make them refer the native-endian UTF-16/32. But that could cause confusing errors as we would change the meaning of them. We could add `Encoding::UTF_16NE` / `Encoding::UTF_16_NATIVE_ENDIAN` if that is useful. Another possibility would be to resolve these encodings on String creation, like: ``` "\xFF\xFE".force_encoding("UTF-16").encoding # => UTF-16LE String.new("\xFF\xFE", encoding: Encoding::UTF_16).encoding # => UTF-16LE "ab".force_encoding("UTF-16").encoding # exception, not a BOM String.new("ab", encoding: Encoding::UTF_16).encoding # exception, not a BOM ``` I think it is unnecessary to keep such complexity though. A class method on String or Encoding like e.g. `Encoding.find_from_bom(string)` is so much clearer and efficient (no need to special case those encodings in String.new, #force_encoding, etc). FWIW JRuby seems to use `getActualEncoding()` only in 2 places (scanForCodeRange, inspect), which is an indication those dummy UTF encodings are barely used if ever. Similarly, TruffleRuby only has 4 usages of `GetActualEncodingNode`. ### Existing dummy encodings ``` > Encoding.list.select(&:dummy?) [#<Encoding:UTF-16 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:UTF-32 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:IBM037 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:UTF-7 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP-2 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP-KDDI (dummy)>, #<Encoding:CP50220 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:CP50221 (dummy)>] ``` So besides UTF-16/UTF-32 dummy, it's only 7 encodings. Does anyone use one of these 7 dummy encodings? What is interesting to note, is that these encodings are exactly the ones that are also not ASCII-compatible, with the exception of UTF-16BE/UTF-16LE/UTF-32BE/UTF-32LE (non-dummy). As a note, UTF-{16,32}{BE,LE} are ASCII-compatible in codepoints but not in bytes, and Ruby uses the bytes definition of ASCII-compatible. There is potential to simplify encoding compatibility rules and encoding compatibility checks based on that. So what this means is if we removed dummy encodings, all encodings except UTF-{16,32}{BE,LE} would be ASCII-compatible, which would lead to significant simplifications for many string operations which currently need to handle dummy encodings specially. Unicode encodings like UTF-{16,32}{BE,LE} already have special behavior for some Ruby methods, so those are already handled specially in some places (they are the only encodings with minLength > 1). ``` > Encoding.list.reject(&:ascii_compatible?) [#<Encoding:UTF-16BE>, #<Encoding:UTF-16LE>, #<Encoding:UTF-32BE>, #<Encoding:UTF-32LE>, #<Encoding:UTF-16 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:UTF-32 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:IBM037 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:UTF-7 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP-2 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:ISO-2022-JP-KDDI (dummy)>, #<Encoding:CP50220 (dummy)>, #<Encoding:CP50221 (dummy)>] ``` What can we do with such a dummy non-ASCII-compatible encoding? Almost nothing useful: ```ruby s = "abc".encode("IBM037") => "\x81\x82\x83" > s.bytes => [129, 130, 131] > s.codepoints => [129, 130, 131] > s == "abc" => false > "été".encode("IBM037") => "\x51\xA3\x51" ``` So about the only thing that works with them is `String#encode`. I think we could preserve that functionality, if actually used (does anyone use one of these 7 dummy encodings?), through: ```ruby > "été".encode("IBM037") => "\x51\xA3\x51" (.encoding == BINARY) > "\x51\xA3\x51".encode("UTF-8", "IBM037") # encode from IBM037 to UTF-8 => "été" (.encoding == UTF-8) ``` That way there is no need for those to be Encoding instances, we would only need the conversion tables. It is even better if we can remove them, so the notion of "dummy encodings" can disappear completely and nobody needs to understand or implement them. ### rb_define_dummy_encoding(name) The C-API has `rb_define_dummy_encoding(const char *name)`. This creates a new Encoding instance with `dummy?=true`, and it is also non-ASCII-compatible. There seems to be no purpose to this besides storing the metadata of an encoding which does not exist in Ruby. This seems a really expensive/complex way to handle that from the VM point of view (because it dynamically creates an Encoding and add it to lists/maps/etc). A simple replacement would be to mark the String as BINARY and save the encoding name as an instance variable of that String. Since anyway Ruby can't understand anything about that String, it's just raw bytes to Ruby's eyes. ## Summary I suggest we deprecate replicate and dummy encodings in Ruby 3.2. And then we remove them in the next version. This will significantly simplify string-related methods, and the behavior exposed to Ruby users. It will also significantly speedup encoding lookup in CRuby (and other Ruby implementations). With a fixed number of encodings we can ensure all encoding indices fit in 7 bits, and `ENCODING_GET` can be simply `RB_ENCODING_GET_INLINED`. `get_actual_encoding()` will be gone and its overhead as well. `rb_enc_from_index()` would be just `return global_enc_table->list[index].enc;`, instead of the expensive behavior currently with `GLOBAL_ENC_TABLE_EVAL` which takes a lock and more when there are multiple Ractors. Many checks in these methods would be removed as well. Yet another improvement would be to load all encodings eagerly, that is small and fast in my experience, what is slow and big is the conversion tables, that'd simplify `must_encindex()` further. These changes would affect most String methods, which use ``` STR_ENC_GET->get_encoding which does: get_actual_encoding->rb_enc_from_index and possibly ->enc_from_index ENCODING_GET->RB_ENCODING_GET_INLINED and possibly ->rb_enc_get_index->enc_get_index_str->rb_attr_get ``` Some of these details are mentioned in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6095#discussion_r915149708. The overhead is so large that it is worth handling some hardcoded encoding indices directly in String methods. This feels wrong, getting the encoding from a String should be simple, straightforward and fast. Further optimizations will be unlocked as the encoding list becomes fixed and immutable. For example, the name-to-Encoding map is then immutable and could use perfect hashing. Inline caching those lookups also becomes easier as the the map cannot change. Also that map would no longer need synchronization, etc. ## To Decide Each item is independent. I think 1 & 2 are very important, 3 less but would be nice. 1. Deprecate and then remove `Encoding#replicate` and `rb_define_dummy_encoding()`. With that there is a fixed number of encodings, a lot of simplifications and many optimizations become available. They are used respectively in only 1 gem and 5 gems, see https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18949#note-4 2. Deprecate and then remove the dummy UTF-16 and UTF-32 encodings. This removes the need for `get_actual_encoding()` which is expensive. This functionality seems rarely used in practice, and it only works when such strings have a BOM, which is very rare. 3. Deprecate and then remove other dummy encodings, so there are no more dummy "half-implemented" encodings and all encodings are ASCII-compatible in terms of codepoints. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111694] [Ruby master Bug#18518] NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #18518 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). So on 32-bit platforms it already behaves as I would expect, from the log in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19260?next_issue_id=19259&prev_issue_id=1… ```ruby 1 << (2**40) #=> RangeError (shift width too big) ``` I think a shift width over 32 signed bits is too much for all platforms, and it would be useful if the behavior in that regard is the same for all platforms. Nobody wants to wait a very long time only to get a NoMemoryError for such code, isn't it? ---------------------------------------- Bug #18518: NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18518#change-101093 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Repro: ```ruby exp = 2**40 # also fails with bignum e.g. 2**64 def exc begin yield rescue NoMemoryError => e p :NoMemoryError end end p exp exc { (1 << exp) } exc { (-1 << exp) } exc { (bignum_value << exp) } exc { (-bignum_value << exp) } ``` Output: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError [FATAL] failed to allocate memory ``` 3.1.0 seems fine: ``` $ ruby -v mri_oom.rb ruby 3.1.0p0 (2021-12-25 revision fb4df44d16) [x86_64-linux] mri_oom.rb:7: warning: assigned but unused variable - e 1099511627776 :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError :NoMemoryError ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111692] [Ruby master Bug#8973] Allow to configure archlibdir for multiarch
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #8973 has been updated by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). Actually, the real intention here is to get rid of the `${arch}` from the paths. The thing is that `--enable-multiarch` used to make it possible, because this is the implementation: ~~~ rubyarchprefix=${multiarch+'${archlibdir}/${RUBY_BASE_NAME}'}${multiarch-'${rubylibprefix}/${arch}'} ~~~ As you can see, when `multiarch` is not defined, then the `${arch}` is mandatory. With `multiarch` enabled, it is enough to modify the `${archlibdir}` and whatever is the is there. It does not impose any expectations. BTW out of curiosity, assuming that upstream expect that Ruby is installed via `./configure && make && make install`, what is the reason to bother with `${arch}` for non multiarch configurations? Does anybody really use single installation directory with multiple architectures? ---------------------------------------- Bug #8973: Allow to configure archlibdir for multiarch https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8973#change-101092 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Feedback * Priority: Normal * Assignee: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-09-22 trunk 43011) [x86_64-linux] ---------------------------------------- Since r39347, there is impossible to configure placement of rubylib.so when build is configured with "--with-multiarch". That is probably OK for Debian, but it breaks Fedora :/ The attached patch allows to configure the archlibdir, but I feel that it is suboptimal, since the "--with-rubyarchprefix" should probably be the parameter which influences placement of the arch specific libraries. Any chance that this patch is accepted or better if rubyarchprefix is respected for every arch specific library, including libruby.so. Thanks. ---Files-------------------------------- ruby-2.1.0-Enable-configuration-of-archlibdir.patch (479 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
1 0
0 0
[ruby-core:111585] [Ruby master Bug#19302] Non-destructive String#insert
by noraj (Alexandre ZANNI) 06 Jan '23

06 Jan '23
Issue #19302 has been reported by noraj (Alexandre ZANNI). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19302: Non-destructive String#insert https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19302 * Author: noraj (Alexandre ZANNI) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- It would be nice to have a non-destructive version of String#insert to be able to work with frozen literals. ## Current behavior There is only a destructive version of `String#insert` that will throw an error if the string is frozen. ```ruby irb(main):007:0> a = 'foobar'.freeze irb(main):008:0> b = a.insert(3,'baz') (irb):8:in `insert': can't modify frozen String: "foobar" (FrozenError) from (irb):8:in `<main>' from /home/noraj/.asdf/installs/ruby/3.2.0/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/irb-1.6.2/exe/irb:11:in `<top (required)>' from /home/noraj/.asdf/installs/ruby/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `load' from /home/noraj/.asdf/installs/ruby/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `<main>' ``` This can happen pretty quickly when you have `# frozen_string_literal: true` in all your files. ## Idea of implementation ```ruby def insert_nd(idx, str2) self[0...idx] + str2 + self[idx..] end ``` Note: this is a draft, as it doesn't handle negative index in the same way as insert ## Idea of naming Ideally the actual `String#insert` would have been `String#insert!` so that the non-destructive version could be `String#insert`, but naturally that won't do as a renaming will cause a breaking change. A more viable option would be to name it `insert_nd` (nd for non-destructive) but it's may not be following a naming convention. Another idea to avoid confusion would be to avoid using `insert` and rather use a synonym like _place_, _slip_, _slot_, _lodge_, etc. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
3 4
0 0
  • ← Newer
  • 1
  • ...
  • 296
  • 297
  • 298
  • 299
  • 300
  • 301
  • 302
  • ...
  • 329
  • Older →

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.