September 2023 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:114038] [Ruby master Bug#19749] Confirm correct behaviour when attaching private method with `#define_method`
by itarato (Peter Arato) 06 Jun '24

06 Jun '24

Issue #19749 has been reported by itarato (Peter Arato). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19749: Confirm correct behaviour when attaching private method with `#define_method` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19749 * Author: itarato (Peter Arato) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.3.0 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This issue is a special case of https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19745: Should dynamically added private methods via `.singleton_class.send(:define_method,...` be accessible publicly? See the following example? ```ruby private def bar; end foo = Object.new foo.singleton_class.send(:define_method, :bar, method(:bar)) foo.bar # No error. ``` The script above runs fine on latest Ruby 3.3. Is this correct to ignore the fact that the added method (method(:bar)) is private? This came up during a TruffleRuby investigation (https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/3134) where the result for the same script is: `private method 'bar' called for #<Object:0xc8> (NoMethodError)` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 14

[ruby-core:112538] [Ruby master Feature#19458] Expose HEREDOC identifier
by joelhawksley (Joel Hawksley) 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

Issue #19458 has been reported by joelhawksley (Joel Hawksley). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19458: Expose HEREDOC identifier https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19458 * Author: joelhawksley (Joel Hawksley) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- I’d like to have access to the HEREDOC identifier. In the ViewComponent framework I help maintain, we added a method to declare a template as such: ```ruby class Component erb_template <<~ERB <h1>Hello, <%= @name %>!</h1> ERB end ``` I'd prefer to be able to write: ```ruby class Component template <<~ERB <h1>Hello, <%= @name %>!</h1> ERB end ``` And be able to see that the argument passed to `.template` was from a HEREDOC with an `ERB` identifier, which would allow me to use the correct template handler to compile the template. I could see this being implemented: 1) As a new property of String, such as `identifier` or `heredoc_identifier`. 2) By having HEREDOCs return a subclass of String that includes an `identifier` property. I'd be happy to work on implementing this change. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

9 13

[ruby-core:113410] [Ruby master Bug#19631] module_eval does not propulate absolute_path for Kernel.caller_locations
by daveola (David Stellar) 27 May '24

27 May '24

Issue #19631 has been reported by daveola (David Stellar). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19631: module_eval does not propulate absolute_path for Kernel.caller_locations https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19631 * Author: daveola (David Stellar) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I am using module_eval and noticing that since ruby 3.2 the Kernel locations do not have absolute_path for any of the eval code, though the path is available. This is a regression since at least ruby 3.0 which still works. I am on 3.2.2, and here is some sample code: ---- class Script < Module script = %q{ def self.locations Kernel.caller_locations.each { |loc| puts "LOCATION: #{loc}" puts "ABSPATH: #{loc.absolute_path}" puts "PATH: #{loc.path}" } end self.locations } module_eval(script, "/this/is/my/path", 0) end ------ The output for the code at the top of the caller locations (inside the module_eval) is: LOCATION: /this/is/my/path:9:in `<class:Script>' ABSPATH: PATH: /this/is/my/path But the absolute_path should have the correct path data as well -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:114062] [Ruby master Bug#19751] Ruby 3.2.2 Fails to Compile from Source
by martin_vahi (Martin Vahi) 23 May '24

23 May '24

Issue #19751 has been reported by martin_vahi (Martin Vahi). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19751: Ruby 3.2.2 Fails to Compile from Source https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19751 * Author: martin_vahi (Martin Vahi) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Details are at the attached file, but the build-crash-log seems to be: ``` compiling addr2line.c compiling dmyenc.c linking miniruby /bin/sh ./tool/ifchange "--timestamp=.rbconfig.time" rbconfig.rb rbconfig.tmp rbconfig.rb updated generating encdb.h encdb.h updated generating x86_64-linux-fake.rb ./template/fake.rb.in:19:in `eval': (eval):1: syntax error, unexpected backslash (SyntaxError) \\# 71 "./version.c" 3 ... ^ from ./template/fake.rb.in:19:in `value' from ./template/fake.rb.in:24:in `block (3 levels) in <main>' from ./template/fake.rb.in:23:in `scan' from ./template/fake.rb.in:23:in `block (2 levels) in <main>' from /home/mmmv/applications/Ruby/v_3_1_2/lib/ruby/3.1.0/erb.rb:905:in `eval' from /home/mmmv/applications/Ruby/v_3_1_2/lib/ruby/3.1.0/erb.rb:905:in `result' from ./tool/generic_erb.rb:36:in `block (2 levels) in <main>' from ./tool/generic_erb.rb:36:in `block in <main>' from ./tool/generic_erb.rb:29:in `map' from ./tool/generic_erb.rb:29:in `<main>' make: *** [uncommon.mk:791: x86_64-linux-fake.rb] Error 1 mmmv@hoidla01:~/tmp_/kompil/2023_03_30_v_3_2_2/ruby-3.2.2$ uname -a Linux hoidla01 4.19.0-22-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.260-1 (2022-09-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux mmmv@hoidla01:~/tmp_/kompil/2023_03_30_v_3_2_2/ruby-3.2.2$ ``` The source was the official one from the https://cache.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/3.2/ruby-3.2.2.tar.xz Thank You for reading this bug report :-) ---Files-------------------------------- Ruby_v_3_2_2_fails_to_compile.txt (31.6 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 8

[ruby-core:114070] [Ruby master Bug#19753] IO::Buffer#get_string can't handle negative offset
by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) 18 May '24

18 May '24

Issue #19753 has been reported by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19753: IO::Buffer#get_string can't handle negative offset https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19753 * Author: noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby irb(main):001:0> b = IO::Buffer.for('abc') => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f858f5450c0+3 EXTERNAL READONLY SLICE> ... irb(main):002:0> b.get_string(-1) => "\x00abc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000, 3) (irb):3:in `get_string': Specified offset+length exceeds data size! (ArgumentError) from (irb):3:in `<main>' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/irb-1.7.1/exe/irb:9:in `<top (required)>' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `load' from /home/sharon/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0/bin/irb:25:in `<main>' ``` Using a negative offset returns garbage in the string but it also might segfault: ```ruby irb(main):003:0> b = IO::Buffer.map(File.open('sgt-nodes.sql', 'r+')) => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f189de14000+2008858 EXTERNAL MAPPED SHARED> irb(main):004:0> b.get_string(-1000) (irb):4: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x00007f189de13c18 ruby 3.2.0 (2022-12-25 revision a528908271) [x86_64-linux] -- Control frame information ----------------------------------------------- c:0021 p:---- s:0109 e:000108 CFUNC :get_string ... ``` ## Expected behaviour I think it might be nice to have `#get_string` behave like other methods taking an offset, like `String#[]`. For example: ```ruby irb(main):001:0> b = IO::Buffer.for('abc') => #<IO::Buffer 0x00007f858f5450c0+3 EXTERNAL READONLY SLICE> ... irb(main):002:0> b.get_string(-1) => "c" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-2) => "bc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000) => "abc" irb(main):003:0> b.get_string(-1000, 2) => "ab" ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 9

[ruby-core:112304] [Ruby master Bug#19427] Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases
by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) 16 May '24

16 May '24

Issue #19427 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19427: Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19427 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.1 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I've noticed that the `freeze` option doesn't work in the following cases: - when dumped object extends a module - when dumped object responds to `#marshal_dump` and `#marshal_load` methods - when dumped object responds to `#_dump` method Is it expected behaviour or a known issue? Examples: ```ruby module M end object = Object.new object.extend(M) object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(object), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserMarshal attr_accessor :data def initialize @data = 'stuff' end def marshal_dump() :data end def marshal_load(data) @data = data end end object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(UserMarshal.new), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserDefined attr_reader :a, :b def initialize @a = 'stuff' @b = @a end def _dump(depth) Marshal.dump [:stuff, :stuff] end def self._load(data) a, b = Marshal.load data obj = allocate obj.instance_variable_set :@a, a obj.instance_variable_set :@b, b obj end end ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 13

[ruby-core:112873] [Ruby master Bug#19530] `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours
by dstosik (David Stosik) 16 May '24

16 May '24

Issue #19530 has been reported by dstosik (David Stosik). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19530: `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19530 * Author: dstosik (David Stosik) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [arm64-darwin22] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi everyone. 👋🏻 We recently discovered that `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` will output different results in some edge cases. Here's the smallest script I managed to write to reproduce the issue: ``` ruby class Money def initialize(amount) @amount = amount.to_f end def +(other) self.class.new(@amount + other.to_f) end def to_f @amount end end p [7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Money p [7.0] .sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Float 💥 ``` I understand that it is expected that `#sum` may not honor custom definitions of the `#+` method (particularly when the summed values are `Float`). However, I would like to bring your attention to the fact that, in the example above, calling `#sum` on an `Array` of `Float` values and calling `#sum` on an `Enumerable` that yields the same `Float` values will return results of different types. I've reproduced the same behaviour with multiple versions of Ruby going from 2.6.5 to 3.2.1. Ideally, I would expect `[7.0].sum(Money.new(0))` to return a `Money` object identical to the one returned by `[7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0))`. I think it would make sense if at least they returned an identical value (even if it is a `Float`). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:114403] [Ruby master Feature#19840] [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find
by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley) 15 May '24

15 May '24

Issue #19840 has been reported by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19840: [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19840 * Author: FlickGradley (Nick Bradley) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Hello! I love Ruby's pattern matching features. I would like to propose an expansion of the Find pattern which allows the selection of multiple matching elements of an array. I often find myself dealing with data like this: ``` ruby { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }, ... ] } ``` My problem is that I need to retrieve all the `id` values from the nested array of hashes, and I don't know how many there will be in advance. It seems that the Find pattern could be expanded from allowing `pattern` (matching a single element) to `*pattern`. Examples: ``` ruby # Base case case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # With * at the end (rest of args) - same result case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }, *] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # When one element doesn't match and there is no *rest case { results: [{ name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> not matched ``` Similarly, `*Constant` could work to pull out types with an As pattern: ``` ruby case [1, 2, 3, "string"] in *Integer => nums, * "matched: #{nums}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2, 3] ``` Other patterns would work in the same way. Essentially, this expands the concept of `*` in pattern matching to mean "a variable number of `things matching subpattern`". Today, the only pattern supported by `*` is a variable binding - but it could be any of the other subpatterns as well. This proposal does imply that this would work: ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, 2, 3] in [*, *^a, *] #=> true ``` To me, the `*` represents the variable number of matches, so the syntax makes intuitive sense. But others may have different opinions about `*^` being adjacent. It may also imply this would work, though we could restrict the number of non-variable patterns (in other words, patterns that have the possibility of not matching) to 1 per Array so that this isn't possible.. I'm not sure something like this would be useful or clear. ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, "hello", "ruby"] in [*Integer, *String] #=> true ``` This feature feels like the missing piece of the Find pattern to me - I often want to "Find Multiple". If others agree, I would be happy to contribute by working on this feature and creating a pull request. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 2

[ruby-core:113195] [Ruby master Bug#19592] Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4
by npic1 (Nat Pic1) 07 Apr '24

07 Apr '24

Issue #19592 has been reported by npic1 (Nat Pic1). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19592: Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19592 * Author: npic1 (Nat Pic1) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi, I need to statically link a single extension (not all of them) by adding it to ext/Setup. This worked until version 3.1.4 and 3.2.x. It appears that this change broke it: [https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-master/repository/git/revisions/79… [https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6756](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6…. I have attached a script to reproduce the issue. When running the script, `ldd` fails with: ``` ext/extinit.o: in function `Init_ext': extinit.c:(.text+0x10): undefined reference to `ruby_init_ext' ``` ---Files-------------------------------- ruby_static_test.sh (1.57 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 2

[ruby-core:113782] [Ruby master Bug#19716] SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc)
by alexdowad (Alex Dowad) 27 Mar '24

27 Mar '24

Issue #19716 has been reported by alexdowad (Alex Dowad). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19716: SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19716 * Author: alexdowad (Alex Dowad) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.1.4p223 (2023-03-30 revision 957bb7cb81) [x86_64-linux-musl] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This is the same problem previously reported against Ruby 2.5 in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387. I just ran into the same problem on Ruby 3.1.4, built on Alpine Linux 3.16. @hsbt stated in the previous thread (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387#note-28) > If you have this issue with Ruby 3.2, please file it with another issue. I hacked `stack_check` in gc.c to print the values of `STACK_START` and `STACK_END` on stack overflow; on the Alpine 3.16 host where this problem just occurred, the values printed were: > Start=0x7ffd0bf4f000, End=0x7ffd0bf32530 ...which shows that Ruby thinks the stack size is only 131072 bytes. On the other hand, `ulimit -s` shows a stack size limit of 8192kb. This Ruby 3.1.4 was built from unmodified source code downloaded from https://cache.ruby-lang.org; the build was configured using `CFLAGS='-march=native' ./configure --disable-install-doc`. The invocation of Ruby which blew the stack was `bundle exec rake db:migrate`, on a mid-sized Rails project. Regarding @ncopa's patch from #14387, @wanabe listed some things which should be done before it is merged into mainline Ruby: > Okay, The patch needs one or more proofs of its behaviour, like that: > > Original issue [ruby-dev:50421] has gone away. > Standard test codes run well. > test-all > ruby/spec > getrlimit works on some situations like: > on single thread > with multiple threads > with RLIMIT_STACK environment variable > getrlimit code of musl is implemented correctly as expected. > (But It's doubtful whether it can be. I guess that a proof of code soundness is very difficult.) > Some "real world" applications can work. > I think it is better example that that application(s) can't work without the patch. I am happy to help cover some of these points if the Ruby development team is still interested in merging @ncopa's patch. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 5