February 2024 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:115466] [Ruby master Bug#20020] Segfault running regexp match?
by andrea.salicetti＠gmail.com (Andrea Salicetti) 23 Aug '26

23 Aug '26

Issue #20020 has been reported by andrea.salicetti(a)gmail.com (Andrea Salicetti). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20020: Segfault running regexp match? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20020 * Author: andrea.salicetti(a)gmail.com (Andrea Salicetti) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-darwin23] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- **Ruby version** : ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-darwin23] From `irb`, trying to call `match?` on this regular expression causes a segmentation falut: ```ruby irb(main):001:0> /^((a|c)|\s?){1,3}$/.match?('abc') => false irb(main):002:0> /^((a|c)|\s?){1,3}$/.match?('abc') (irb):2: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x000000061ba998e8 ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x86_64-darwin23] -- Crash Report log information -------------------------------------------- See Crash Report log file in one of the following locations: * ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports * /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports for more details. Don't forget to include the above Crash Report log file in bug reports. -- Control frame information ----------------------------------------------- c:0037 p:---- s:0207 e:000206 CFUNC :match? c:0036 p:0006 s:0202 e:000201 EVAL (irb):2 [FINISH] c:0035 p:---- s:0199 e:000198 CFUNC :eval c:0034 p:0020 s:0191 e:000190 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb/workspace.rb:119 c:0033 p:0153 s:0183 e:000181 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb/context.rb:502 c:0032 p:0119 s:0170 e:000169 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:588 c:0031 p:0024 s:0164 e:000163 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:777 c:0030 p:0007 s:0158 e:000157 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:567 c:0029 p:0126 s:0153 e:000152 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:267 [FINISH] c:0028 p:---- s:0149 e:000148 CFUNC :loop c:0027 p:0005 s:0145 e:000144 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:249 [FINISH] c:0026 p:---- s:0142 e:000141 CFUNC :catch c:0025 p:0010 s:0137 e:000136 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:248 c:0024 p:0050 s:0132 E:000dd8 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:566 c:0023 p:0003 s:0127 e:000126 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:500 [FINISH] c:0022 p:---- s:0124 e:000123 CFUNC :catch c:0021 p:0050 s:0119 E:000d50 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:499 c:0020 p:0069 s:0113 e:000112 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/irb.rb:421 c:0019 p:0012 s:0107 e:000106 TOP /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/irb-1.6.2/exe/irb:11 [FINISH] c:0018 p:---- s:0104 e:000103 CFUNC :load c:0017 p:0078 s:0099 e:000098 TOP /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/bin/irb:25 [FINISH] c:0016 p:---- s:0094 e:000093 CFUNC :load c:0015 p:0064 s:0089 e:000088 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/cli/exec.rb:58 c:0014 p:0050 s:0083 e:000082 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/cli/exec.rb:23 c:0013 p:0034 s:0078 e:000077 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/cli.rb:492 c:0012 p:0054 s:0073 e:000072 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/command.rb:28 c:0011 p:0040 s:0065 e:000064 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/invocation.rb:127 c:0010 p:0213 s:0058 e:000057 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor.rb:527 c:0009 p:0008 s:0045 e:000044 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/cli.rb:34 c:0008 p:0044 s:0040 e:000039 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/base.rb:584 c:0007 p:0022 s:0033 e:000032 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/cli.rb:28 c:0006 p:0042 s:0028 e:000027 BLOCK /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bundler-2.4.22/exe/bundle:37 c:0005 p:0007 s:0022 e:000021 METHOD /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/site_ruby/3.2.0/bundler/friendly_errors.rb:117 c:0004 p:0108 s:0017 E:0019b8 TOP /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bundler-2.4.22/exe/bundle:29 [FINISH] c:0003 p:---- s:0013 e:000012 CFUNC :load c:0002 p:0081 s:0008 E:000220 EVAL /Users/andreasalicetti/.rbenv/versions/3.2.2/bin/bundle:25 [FINISH] c:0001 p:0000 s:0003 E:001980 DUMMY [FINISH] ``` Sometimes this happens the very first time I try to execute the command, some other times I have to try a couple of times to see that Segmentation Fault (but usually within the first 5 attempts). ---Files-------------------------------- ruby-2023-11-23-175410.ips (20.2 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 5

[ruby-core:111678] [Ruby master Feature#19315] Lazy substrings in CRuby
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

Issue #19315 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19315: Lazy substrings in CRuby https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19315 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- CRuby should implement lazy substrings, i.e., "abcdef"[1..3] must not copy bytes. Currently CRuby only reuse the char* if the substring is until the end of the buffer. But it should also work wherever the substring starts and ends. Yes, it means RSTRING_PTR() might need to allocate to \0-terminate, so be it, it's worth it. There is already code for this (`SHARABLE_MIDDLE_SUBSTRING`), but it's disabled by default and `RSTRING_PTR()` needs to be changed to deal with this. It seems a good idea to introduce a variant of `RSTRING_PTR` which doesn't guarantee \0-termination, so such callers can then use the existing bytes always without copy. There are countless workarounds for this missing optimization, all not worth and all less readable: * https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19314 * https://github.com/ruby/net-protocol/pull/14 * Manual lazy substrings which track string + index + length * More but I don't remember all now, feel free to comment or link more urls/tickets. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

10 51

[ruby-core:116370] [Ruby master Bug#20203] `TestEnumerable` test failures with GCC 14
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 17 Aug '26

17 Aug '26

Issue #20203 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20203: `TestEnumerable` test failures with GCC 14 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20203 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- There is ongoing mass rebuild in Fedora and that is first time GCC 14 is used and we observe test failures in `TestEnumerable`. Here are a few examples: ~~~ [ 3000/26419] TestEnumerable#test_transient_heap_sort_bymalloc_consolidate(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected ~~~ ~~~ [ 2455/26535] TestEnumerable#test_transient_heap_sort_bycorrupted size vs. prev_size in fastbins ~~~ ~~~ [ 9716/26532] TestEnumerable#test_any_with_unused_blockdouble free or corruption (fasttop) ~~~ The full logs are accessible [here](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112176941). Please drill through `Descendants` and `build.log` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 13

[ruby-core:116226] [Ruby master Bug#20189] `rb_str_resize` does not clear coderange when expanding
by tompng (tomoya ishida) 16 Aug '26

16 Aug '26

Issue #20189 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20189: `rb_str_resize` does not clear coderange when expanding https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20189 * Author: tompng (tomoya ishida) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-01-09T07:07:19Z master db476cc71c) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Expanding string in some encoding (utf16 utf32) can change coderange to either valid or broken, but rb_str_resize does not clear coderange. This will cause a bug in c-extension libraries that use rb_str_resize. ~~~ruby # Example for stringio s = StringIO.new("\0".encode('UTF-16LE')) s.truncate(1); s.truncate(2); s.string.valid_encoding? #=> true s.truncate(1); s.string.valid_encoding?; s.truncate(2); s.string.valid_encoding? #=> false (expect to be true) ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 6

[ruby-core:114943] [Ruby master Bug#19910] Set#delete_if behavior inconsistent with Array/Hash
by segiddins (Samuel Giddins) 16 Aug '26

16 Aug '26

Issue #19910 has been reported by segiddins (Samuel Giddins). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19910: Set#delete_if behavior inconsistent with Array/Hash https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19910 * Author: segiddins (Samuel Giddins) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.2 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Given the following script: ```ruby #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'set' def enum(collection) i = 0 collection.delete_if do i += 1 raise ArgumentError if i == 6 i.odd? end rescue ArgumentError return collection end pp enum([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]) pp enum([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].to_h { [_1, _1] }) pp enum([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].to_set) ``` It results in: ``` [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] {1=>1, 3=>3, 5=>5, 6=>6, 7=>7} #<Set: {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}> ``` As you can see, when an exception is raise inside `delete_if` on Hash/Array, the already-considered elements are still removed from the array. For `Set`, no elements are deleted (due to the implementation that builds up an intermediary list of elements to delete, then removes them from the underlying hash afterwards). It would be very helpful if `Set#delete_if` behaved consistently with other core collection types -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 4

[ruby-core:115016] [Ruby master Bug#19921] TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 test failure
by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) 03 Aug '26

03 Aug '26

Issue #19921 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19921: TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 test failure https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19921 * Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-10-12 master 52709a4862) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Testing with 52709a4862 on Fedora Rawhide, I observe following failure: ~~~ 94) Failure: TestYJIT#test_bug_19316 [/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-3.3.0-52709a4862/test/ruby/test_yjit.rb:1126]: Expected no exits, but got {:opt_and=>1} ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 21

[ruby-core:112045] [Ruby master Bug#19378] Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems
by aidog (Andi Idogawa) 27 Jul '26

27 Jul '26

Issue #19378 has been reported by aidog (Andi Idogawa). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19378: Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19378 * Author: aidog (Andi Idogawa) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.0 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hello 🙂 ## Problem require is slow on windows for big gems. (example: require 'gtk3'=> 3 seconds+). This is a problem for people who want to make cross platform GUI apps with ruby. ## Possible Reason As touched on in [#15797](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15797) it seems like require uses realpath, which is emulated on windows. It checks every parent directory. The same syscalls run many times. ## Testfile C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb: ``` ruby require __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" require __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` shell ruby --disable-gems C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb ``` ### Syscalls per File/Directory: 1. CreateFile 2. QueryInformationVolume 3. QueryIdInformation 4. QueryAllInformationFile 5. QueryNameInformationFile 6. QueryNameInformationFile 7. QueryNormalizedNameInformationFile 8. CloseFile ### Files/Directories checked 1. C:\tmp 2. C:\tmp\speedtest 3. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld1.rb 4. C:\tmp 5. C:\tmp\speedtest 6. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld2.rb For two required files Ruby had to do 8*6 = **48** syscalls. The syscalls orginate from rb_w32_reparse_symlink_p / lstat Rubygems live in subfolders with 9+ parts: "C:\Ruby32-x64\lib\ruby\gems\3.2.0\gems\glib2-4.0.8\lib\glib2\variant.rb" Each file takes 8 * 9 = **72**+ calls. For variant.rb it is **80** calls. The result for the syscalls don't change in such a short time, so it should be possible to cache it. With require_relative it's twice as many calls. ## Other testcases Same result: ``` ruby File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` ruby File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` It does not happen in $LOAD_PATH.resolve_feature_path(__dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb") ## Request Would it be possible to cache the stat calls when using require? I tried to implement a cache inside the ruby source code, but failed. If not, is there now a way to combine ruby files into one? I previously talked about require here: [YJIT: Windows support lacking.](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19325#note-11) ## How to reproduce Ruby versions: At least 3.0+, most likely older ones too. Tested using Ruby Installer 3.1 and 3.2. [Procmon Software by Sysinternals](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/proc… -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 9

[ruby-core:116456] [Ruby master Feature#20215] Introduce `IO#readable?`
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 25 Jul '26

25 Jul '26

Issue #20215 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20215: Introduce `IO#readable?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20215 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- There are some cases where, as an optimisation, it's useful to know whether more data is potentially available. We already have `IO#eof?` but the problem with using `IO#eof?` is that it can block indefinitely for sockets. Therefore, code which uses `IO#eof?` to determine if there is potentially more data, may hang. ```ruby def make_request(path = "/") client = connect_remote_host # HTTP/1.0 request: client.write("GET #{path} HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n") # Read response client.gets("\r\n") # => "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n" # Assuming connection close, there are two things the server can do: # 1. peer.close # 2. peer.write(...); peer.close if client.eof? # <--- Can hang here! puts "Connection closed" # Avoid yielding as we know there definitely won't be any data. else puts "Connection open, data may be available..." # There might be data available, so yield. yield(client) end ensure client&.close end make_request do |client| puts client.read # <--- Prefer to wait here. end ``` The proposed `IO#readable?` is similar to `IO#eof?` but rather than blocking, would simply return false. The expectation is the user will subsequently call `read` which may then wait. The proposed implementation would look something like this: ```ruby class IO def readable? !!self.closed? end end class BasicSocket # Is it likely that the socket is still connected? # May return false positive, but won't return false negative. def readable? return false unless super # If we can wait for the socket to become readable, we know that the socket may still be open. result = self.recv_nonblock(1, MSG_PEEK, exception: false) # No data was available - newer Ruby can return nil instead of empty string: return false if result.nil? # Either there was some data available, or we can wait to see if there is data avaialble. return !result.empty? || result == :wait_readable rescue Errno::ECONNRESET # This might be thrown by recv_nonblock. return false end end ``` For `IO` itself, when there is buffered data, `readable?` would also return true immediately, similar to `eof?`. This is not shown in the above implementation as I'm not sure if there is any Ruby method which exposes "there is buffered data". -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

8 19

[ruby-core:115018] [Ruby master Bug#19922] ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV
by wanabe (_ wanabe) 20 Jul '26

20 Jul '26

Issue #19922 has been reported by wanabe (_ wanabe). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19922: ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19922 * Author: wanabe (_ wanabe) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `ObjectSpace.dump_all` in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV. The reproduce code is here: ``` $ ruby -robjspace -e 'def dump; 10.times { ObjectSpace.dump_all } end; Thread.new { dump }; dump' /home/wanabe/.rbenv/versions/master/lib/ruby/3.3.0+0/objspace.rb:100: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 (snip) ``` I attached the full log. I assumed that: - Thread1 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd1 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread2 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread1 - gets unexpected `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 ---Files-------------------------------- bug.log (23.1 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 5

[ruby-core:113743] [Ruby master Feature#19708] Support `attr_reader :foo?`
by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

Issue #19708 has been reported by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19708: Support `attr_reader :foo?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19708 * Author: AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Creating reader methods with `attr_reader` is preferable over defining them by hand, not only because it's more convenient, but also because it hits a fast path in MRI (see `VM_METHOD_TYPE_IVAR`). Since local and instance variables can't end with `?`, you can't use `attr_reader` to define predicate-style methods for boolean values, like: ```ruby class Person attr_reader(:name, :age, :active?) # invalid attribute name `active?' (NameError) def initialize @name = "Bob" @age = 30 @active = true end end ``` It would be nice if `attr_reader` (and friends) could behave like: ```ruby def active? = @active ``` (`attr_writer` and `attr_accessor` couldn't do the same, since `def active?=(new_value)` isn't valid, so they'd probably stick with `def active=(new_value)`) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 7