March 2025 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:119239] [Ruby master Feature#20750] Expose ruby_thread_has_gvl_p in ruby/thread.h
by kbrock (Keenan Brock) 19 Nov '25

19 Nov '25

Issue #20750 has been reported by kbrock (Keenan Brock). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20750: Expose ruby_thread_has_gvl_p in ruby/thread.h https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20750 * Author: kbrock (Keenan Brock) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Hello All, I'm hoping we can make `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` a public method and no longer experimental. I saw the following code in a gem that was not compiling with ruby 3.3: ``` c // int ruby_thread_has_gvl_p(void); // <== line of concern if (ruby_thread_has_gvl_p()) { method_call(&context); } else { rb_thread_call_with_gvl(method_call, &context); } ``` 400 unique projects on github added the line listed above to fix compilation. [1] Some of the projects detected the method first in `extconf.rb`, but a majority just referenced it. `ffi` used to have the detection code but dropped it since the method was in all supported ruby versions. It feels like this method is now part of the undocumented public interface. My suggestion is to add the method to the real public interface in `ruby/thread.h`. PR with possible solution: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11619 Also included a patch if that is easier Thank you for your consideration, Keenan Timeline: - Dec 30 2008 - `rb_thread_call_with_gvl` introduced via 9c04a06 [2] - Jan 12 2009 - `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` introduced via 6f09fc2 [4] - Jul 18 2012 - `rb_thread_call_with_gvl` made public via e9a91d2 [3] Current references to code: `rb_thread_call_with_gvl` [5] `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` [6]: [1]: https://github.com/search?q=ruby_thread_has_gvl_p+language%3AC++NOT+is%3Afo… [2]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/9c04a0647fb99f7554cb2e04385ddbb970631e02 [3]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/e9a91d2c95dfe22ad0487952f7a1053ef9a5fd16 [4]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/6f09fc2efd1915c4337ce6dded52a8a8771c3222 [5]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/thread.c#L1878 [6]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/thread.c#L1923 ---Files-------------------------------- 11618.patch (3.18 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 8

[ruby-core:119998] [Ruby master Bug#20907] Fiber scheduler does not correctly re-lock mutex if `Mutex#sleep` is interrupted.
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 17 Nov '25

17 Nov '25

Issue #20907 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20907: Fiber scheduler does not correctly re-lock mutex if `Mutex#sleep` is interrupted. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20907 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Backport: 3.1: REQUIRED, 3.2: REQUIRED, 3.3: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- The following test fails with a `ThreadError` instead of a `RuntimeError`: ```ruby def test_condition_variable condition_variable = ::Thread::ConditionVariable.new mutex = ::Thread::Mutex.new error = nil thread = Thread.new do Thread.current.report_on_exception = false scheduler = Scheduler.new Fiber.set_scheduler scheduler fiber = Fiber.schedule do begin mutex.synchronize do condition_variable.wait(mutex) end rescue => error end end fiber.raise(RuntimeError) end thread.join assert_kind_of RuntimeError, error end ``` Fix: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/12158 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:119895] [Ruby master Bug#20889] IO#ungetc and IO#ungetbyte should not cause IO#pos to report an inaccurate position
by javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp) 13 Nov '25

13 Nov '25

Issue #20889 has been reported by javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20889: IO#ungetc and IO#ungetbyte should not cause IO#pos to report an inaccurate position https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20889 * Author: javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.6 (2024-11-05 revision 75015d4c1f) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby require 'tempfile' Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetbyte(93) f.pos # => -1; negative value is surprising! end Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetc('a'.encode('utf-8')) f.pos # => -1; similar to the ungetbyte case end Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8:utf-16le') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetc('a'.encode('utf-16le')) f.pos # => 0; maybe should be -2 to match the previous ungetc case? end ``` It doesn't seem logical that `IO#pos` should ever be affected by `IO#ungetc` or `IO#ungetbyte`. The pushed characters or bytes aren't really in the stream source. The value of `IO#pos` implies that jumping directly to that position via `IO#seek` and reading from there would return the same character or byte that was pushed, but the pushed characters or bytes are lost when the operation to seek in the stream is performed. In the case where `IO#pos` is a negative value, attempting to seek to that position actually raises an exception. In the `IO#ungetc` with character conversion case above, it seems unreasonable to make `IO#pos` report an even less correct position. In that case, the position would need to be adjusted by 2 bytes in reverse due to the internal encoding of the stream, but that is completely inconsistent with the behavior of `IO#pos` when reading from the stream normally where it reports the underlying stream's byte position and not the number of transcoded bytes that have been read: ```ruby require 'tempfile' Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8:utf-16le') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.getc.bytesize # => 2; due to the internal encoding of the stream f.pos # => 1; reports actual bytes read from the stream, not transcoded bytes end ``` Attempting to use `IO#pos` when there are characters or bytes pushed into the read buffer by way of `IO#ungetc` or `IO#ungetbyte` should result in one of the following behaviors: 1. Raise and exception 2. Return the stream's position, clearing the read buffer entirely 3. Return the stream's position, ignoring the pushed characters or bytes, and produce a warning -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:118243] [Ruby master Feature#20564] Switch default parser to Prism
by kddnewton (Kevin Newton) 22 Oct '25

22 Oct '25

Issue #20564 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20564: Switch default parser to Prism https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20564 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- This issue is to propose switching the default parser for Ruby to Prism on the master branch. The main goal is to get this default into both master and the next preview so that the community has plenty of time to test before the eventual 3.4 release. Matz has indicated that the final decision about the default parser for Ruby 3.4 will be made later in the year. Decisions about the default parser for Ruby 3.5+ and the relationship between Prism, lrama, parse.y, etc. will also be made at a later time. ## Background For some background on the Prism project itself, here are a couple of links in chronological order that you can read: * https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19741 * https://railsatscale.com/2023-06-12-rewriting-the-ruby-parser/ * https://kddnewton.com/2024/01/23/prism.html * https://railsatscale.com/2024-04-16-prism-in-2024/ ## Status Prism now passes all Ruby tests and specs. Internally at Shopify, it also passes our Core monolith's CI, which is a large and complex Rails application. We are confident that it is ready for production use. External to CRuby, Prism has already been adopted extensively around the ecosystem, including but not limited to: * [JRuby](https://github.com/jruby/jruby/pull/8103) (via Java) * [TruffleRuby](https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/3117) (via Java) * [Natalie](https://github.com/natalie-lang/natalie/pull/1213) (via C++ and Ruby) * [Opal](https://github.com/opal/opal/pull/2642) (via Ruby and WASM) * [repl_type_completor](https://github.com/ruby/repl_type_completor) * [rubocop](https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/configuration.html#setting-the-pa… (via parser translator) * [ruby-lsp](https://github.com/Shopify/ruby-lsp) * [packwerk](https://github.com/Shopify/packwerk/pull/388) (via parser translator) Fortunately with the community adoption, we have been able to find many edge cases and bugs that have been fixed. Thank you so much to everyone who has tried, used, reported problems with, and improved Prism in the last couple of years. We would not have hit this milestone without this community involvement. ## Caveats While Prism correctly accepts and parses all valid Ruby syntax, there are still a number of cases where it does not reject invalid syntax as it should. We are currently working on these cases, and we are confident that we can eliminate them before the next preview release. You can find them listed here: https://github.com/ruby/prism/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Ainvalid…. This is our top priority right now, and I anticipate these being resolved quickly. The other caveat is unknown unknowns: bugs or syntax issues that we have yet to discover. At Shopify we are currently taking numerous steps to mitigate this risk, including: * Prism currently passes all Ruby tests and specs, and will continue to going forward. The tests and specs are extensive, and we are confident this gets us almost all of the way there. * Grammar-based fuzzing to ensure we handle all possible syntax variations (both valid and invalid). As an example, that recently led to the discovery that the current compiler was segfaulting on safe navigation in for loops (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20468) It has also found several memory leaks that have been fixed. * Mutation testing of existing source files (by adding and deleting random bytes) to find additional edge cases. Our goal is 100% compatibility, and we believe this is achievable through the above techniques and others. The goal of this proposal is to allow more companies to test their codebase against Prism, and to make this easier. We believe that we can sort out the remaining problems much more quickly in that manner. ## Implementation The implementation will be relatively straightforward, as there is already the `--parser` flag that can be used to switch between the current parser and Prism. We will change the default to be `"prism"` instead of `"parse.y"`. There is no plan to remove or change any code related to `parse.y`, `lrama`, or `compile.c` at this time, as we want to create the minimal amount of change possible to ensure stability. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 10

[ruby-core:111742] [Ruby master Feature#19326] Please add a better API for passing a Proc to a Ractor
by sdwolfz 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

Issue #19326 has been reported by sdwolfz (Codruț Gușoi). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19326: Please add a better API for passing a Proc to a Ractor https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19326 * Author: sdwolfz (Codruț Gușoi) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Example 1: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = block end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Worker.new { 1 } puts worker.run.take ``` Errors with: ``` <internal:ractor>:271:in `new': allocator undefined for Proc (TypeError) from scripts/run.rb:9:in `run' from scripts/run.rb:14:in `<main>' ``` Example 2: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = Ractor.make_shareable(block) end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Worker.new { 1 } puts worker.run.take ``` Errors with: ``` <internal:ractor>:820:in `make_shareable': Proc's self is not shareable: #<Proc:0x00007f00394c38b8 scripts/run.rb:13> (Ractor::IsolationError) from scripts/run.rb:5:in `initialize' from scripts/run.rb:13:in `new' from scripts/run.rb:13:in `<main>' ``` Example 3: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = Ractor.make_shareable(block) end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Ractor.current.instance_eval { Worker.new { 1 } } puts worker.run.take ``` Works, but having `Ractor.current.instance_eval` as a wrapper around the block is not ideal, as Ractor is supposed to be only an implementation detail in Worker. I know about https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18243 and the discussion around `proc.bind(nil)`. That would actually be ideal, as for the purposes if why I want this functionality I don't care what `self` is in a block, and the less it has access to the better. The general idea is to have a Ractor be able to lazily execute an arbitrary proc. And all the bindings it would need would be passed explicitly, either through `args` in the constructor or through `send`/`receive`, so `self` would really not matter. The benefit: this would make it so concurrent code can be more easily be implemented with Ractors as currently you can execute an arbitrary proc by passing it to a Thread (but you don't get the nice data isolation). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 12

[ruby-core:112552] [Ruby master Bug#19461] Time.local performance tanks in forked process (on macOS only?)
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Issue #19461 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19461: Time.local performance tanks in forked process (on macOS only?) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19461 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The following program demonstrates a performance regression in forked child processes when invoking `Time.local`: ```ruby require 'benchmark' require 'time' def sir_local_alot result = Benchmark.measure do 10_000.times do tm = ::Time.local(2023) end end $stderr.puts result end sir_local_alot pid = fork do sir_local_alot end Process.wait(pid) ``` On Linux the performance is similar, but on macOS, the performance is over 100x worse on my M1 laptop. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 10

[ruby-core:116946] [Ruby master Bug#20302] Multiple refinements cannot be applied to the same module
by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 06 Oct '25

06 Oct '25

Issue #20302 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20302: Multiple refinements cannot be applied to the same module https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20302 * Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Status: Open * Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda) * ruby -v: ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-02-20T07:17:20Z master a605234bfa) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- If we are using multiple refinements for the Kernel module, it seems that only the last refinement is enabled. In the following example, we can call `f2` of M2, which is enabled later. but cannot call `f1` of M1. ```ruby module M1 refine(Kernel) do def f1 = :f1 end end module M2 refine(Kernel) do def f2 = :f2 end end class Foo using M1 using M2 def test p f2 #=> :f2 p f1 # expected => :f1 # actual => undefined local variable or method 'f1' for an instance of Foo end end Foo.new.test ``` Note that if I change `refine(Kernel)` to `refine(Object)`, it works as expected. So I think there is a problem only when the refinement target is a module. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:115552] [Ruby master Misc#20032] Propose @kjtsanaktsidis as a commiter
by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 27 Sep '25

27 Sep '25

Issue #20032 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). ---------------------------------------- Misc #20032: Propose @kjtsanaktsidis as a commiter https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20032 * Author: jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- I'd like to propose @kjtsanaktsidis as a committer, with a focus on bug triaging and fixing. During RubyKaigi 2023, KJ expressed interest in helping triage and fix bugs, and since then, he has fixed numerous bugs. What's most impressive about KJ's contributions is the difficulty of the bugs he has fixed, and the wide range of areas in which he has fixed bugs (GC, threading, FreeBSD support, ractors, rubygems, extensions, tests, old bugs, etc.). Here is a list of bugs KJ has fixed: * #20021 * #19994 * #19928 * #19873 * #19387 * #19680 * #4173 Here is a list of open pull requests submitted by KJ to fix bugs: * #20022 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/9041 * #19991 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8949 and https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8856 * #20001 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8903 * #19717 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8331 * #19144 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7295 * #18795 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5992 In addition to these Redmine issues, KJ has also fixed other bugs: * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/9a62fd3cbae2ebb60e2f9cad782af1ad18db4319 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/76dc327eeffefe02577999fe5f8215f762a581b6 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/082962e857833dfc16881cb4dfb44caa175590ba * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/edee9b6a12ac846d7b3de2d704e170bf28178cb3 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/dd406c5a911d2f4a16ce97016666760713540185 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/7bd7aee02e303de27d2cddfc5ef47e612d6782cb * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/05ffc037ad15560cb2c683682c5bc374156571d7 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7867 * https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7865 * https://github.com/ruby/zlib/commit/3b9fe962d8 * https://github.com/ruby/zlib/commit/c96e8b9a57 In addition to bug fixing, KJ has also proposed and implemented a useful Socket feature: * #19179 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6822 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

8 14

[ruby-core:121390] [Ruby Bug#21188] PRISM does not end reading from tty with ^D twice
by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 16 Sep '25

16 Sep '25

Issue #21188 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21188: PRISM does not end reading from tty with ^D twice https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21188 * Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Status: Open * Assignee: prism * Backport: 3.1: DONTNEED, 3.2: DONTNEED, 3.3: DONTNEED, 3.4: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- When reading from tty, `^D` ends the text without the newline. ```console $ cat a ``` Typing `^D` here, only "a" is sent without a newline, and `cat` echos back it. Then by typing `^D` again, an empty read that means EOF causes `cat` to exit. `ruby --parser=parse.y` behaves in this manner: ```console $ ruby --parser=parse.y p __FILE__"-" ``` Typing `^D` twice just after `__FILE__`, and `p` prints `"-"`. However prism requires `^D` thrice. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:120073] [Ruby master Feature#20925] Allow boolean operators at beginning of line to continue previous line
by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) 12 Sep '25

12 Sep '25

Issue #20925 has been reported by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20925: Allow boolean operators at beginning of line to continue previous line https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20925 * Author: Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I would like for this to become accepted syntax: condition1 || condition2 condition1 && condition2 condition1 or condition2 condition1 and condition2 This is similar to how method chaining on the second line was added in Ruby 1.9 expr .method And it has the same advantage: when you have a multi-line expression, instead of hunting for the dot or boolean operator at the end of line1, it's right there at the beginning of line2, making the structure very obvious and readable. Please contrast: request.secret_key_base.present? && request.encrypted_signed_cookie_salt.present? && request.encrypted_cookie_salt.present? && request.use_authenticated_cookie_encryption request.secret_key_base.present? && request.encrypted_signed_cookie_salt.present? && request.encrypted_cookie_salt.present? && request.use_authenticated_cookie_encryption The first expression must rely on indentation to communicate the multi-line nature of the condition, and even then it's not as immediately obvious as the second expression, where we can see easily and immediately that this is a multi-line `&&` condition. This syntax is also similar to how a trailing comma is allowed in arrays and hashes (and method calls since Ruby 1.9), with the same advantage. It makes for a cleaner diff when you add an element to the array/hash/conditional. Taking the previous example, imagine we are adding the condition `&& request.use_authenticated_cookie_encryption`. Now contrast the diff between the two styles: request.secret_key_base.present? && request.encrypted_signed_cookie_salt.present? && - request.encrypted_cookie_salt.present? + request.encrypted_cookie_salt.present? && + request.use_authenticated_cookie_encryption request.secret_key_base.present? && request.encrypted_signed_cookie_salt.present? && request.encrypted_cookie_salt.present? + && request.use_authenticated_cookie_encryption Based on the above I would say this syntax is natural and consistent with existing Ruby syntactical elements, and would greatly improve code readability. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

7 11