July 2025 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:122303] [Ruby Bug#21375] Set[] does not call #initialize
by Ethan (Ethan -) 18 Nov '25

18 Nov '25

Issue #21375 has been reported by Ethan (Ethan -). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21375: Set[] does not call #initialize https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21375 * Author: Ethan (Ethan -) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 3.5.0dev (2025-05-26T17:42:35Z master 909a0daab6) +PRISM [x86_64-darwin22] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I have a subclass of Set that overrides #initialize. Following #21216, .new does call #initialize but .[] does not. ```ruby class MySet < Set def initialize(enum = nil) compare_by_identity super end end MySet.new.compare_by_identity? # => true MySet[].compare_by_identity? # => false ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 10

[ruby-core:122411] [Ruby Bug#21396] Set#initialize should call Set#add on items passed in
by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 18 Nov '25

18 Nov '25

Issue #21396 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21396: Set#initialize should call Set#add on items passed in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21396 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby class Foo < Set def add(item) = super(item.bytesize) end x = Foo.new(["foo"]) p x p x.include?(3) ``` On Ruby 3.4 the output is this: ``` > ruby -v test.rb ruby 3.4.1 (2024-12-25 revision 48d4efcb85) +PRISM [arm64-darwin24] #<Foo: {3}> true ``` On Ruby master the output is this: ``` > make run ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common -r./arm64-darwin24-fake ./test.rb #<Set: {"foo"}> false ``` The bug is that `initialize` is not calling `add` for the elements passed in, so the subclass doesn't get a chance to change them. I've sent a PR here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/13518 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 13

[ruby-core:119998] [Ruby master Bug#20907] Fiber scheduler does not correctly re-lock mutex if `Mutex#sleep` is interrupted.
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 17 Nov '25

17 Nov '25

Issue #20907 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20907: Fiber scheduler does not correctly re-lock mutex if `Mutex#sleep` is interrupted. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20907 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Backport: 3.1: REQUIRED, 3.2: REQUIRED, 3.3: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- The following test fails with a `ThreadError` instead of a `RuntimeError`: ```ruby def test_condition_variable condition_variable = ::Thread::ConditionVariable.new mutex = ::Thread::Mutex.new error = nil thread = Thread.new do Thread.current.report_on_exception = false scheduler = Scheduler.new Fiber.set_scheduler scheduler fiber = Fiber.schedule do begin mutex.synchronize do condition_variable.wait(mutex) end rescue => error end end fiber.raise(RuntimeError) end thread.join assert_kind_of RuntimeError, error end ``` Fix: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/12158 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:121688] [Ruby Feature#21275] Update to Unicode 17.0
by duerst 14 Nov '25

14 Nov '25

Issue #21275 has been reported by duerst (Martin Dürst). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21275: Update to Unicode 17.0 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21275 * Author: duerst (Martin Dürst) * Status: Open * Assignee: duerst (Martin Dürst) * Target version: 3.5 ---------------------------------------- Unicode 17.0 is currently in alpha. Beta is planned for late May, release for September 2025. We just updated to Unicode 16.0, so we can start testing with alpha/beta. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:119895] [Ruby master Bug#20889] IO#ungetc and IO#ungetbyte should not cause IO#pos to report an inaccurate position
by javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp) 13 Nov '25

13 Nov '25

Issue #20889 has been reported by javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20889: IO#ungetc and IO#ungetbyte should not cause IO#pos to report an inaccurate position https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20889 * Author: javanthropus (Jeremy Bopp) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.6 (2024-11-05 revision 75015d4c1f) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby require 'tempfile' Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetbyte(93) f.pos # => -1; negative value is surprising! end Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetc('a'.encode('utf-8')) f.pos # => -1; similar to the ungetbyte case end Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8:utf-16le') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.ungetc('a'.encode('utf-16le')) f.pos # => 0; maybe should be -2 to match the previous ungetc case? end ``` It doesn't seem logical that `IO#pos` should ever be affected by `IO#ungetc` or `IO#ungetbyte`. The pushed characters or bytes aren't really in the stream source. The value of `IO#pos` implies that jumping directly to that position via `IO#seek` and reading from there would return the same character or byte that was pushed, but the pushed characters or bytes are lost when the operation to seek in the stream is performed. In the case where `IO#pos` is a negative value, attempting to seek to that position actually raises an exception. In the `IO#ungetc` with character conversion case above, it seems unreasonable to make `IO#pos` report an even less correct position. In that case, the position would need to be adjusted by 2 bytes in reverse due to the internal encoding of the stream, but that is completely inconsistent with the behavior of `IO#pos` when reading from the stream normally where it reports the underlying stream's byte position and not the number of transcoded bytes that have been read: ```ruby require 'tempfile' Tempfile.open(encoding: 'utf-8:utf-16le') do |f| f.write('0123456789') f.rewind f.getc.bytesize # => 2; due to the internal encoding of the stream f.pos # => 1; reports actual bytes read from the stream, not transcoded bytes end ``` Attempting to use `IO#pos` when there are characters or bytes pushed into the read buffer by way of `IO#ungetc` or `IO#ungetbyte` should result in one of the following behaviors: 1. Raise and exception 2. Return the stream's position, clearing the read buffer entirely 3. Return the stream's position, ignoring the pushed characters or bytes, and produce a warning -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:122773] [Ruby Feature#21513] Raise on converting endless range to set
by viralpraxis (Iaroslav Kurbatov) 13 Nov '25

13 Nov '25

Issue #21513 has been reported by viralpraxis (Iaroslav Kurbatov). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21513: Raise on converting endless range to set https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21513 * Author: viralpraxis (Iaroslav Kurbatov) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- Converting endless range to array raises: ``` shell ruby -e '(1..).to_a' -e:1:in 'Range#to_a': cannot convert endless range to an array (RangeError) from -e:1:in '<main>' ``` but converting to set does not: ``` shell ruby -e '(1..).to_set # hangs' ``` I think it makes to raise in both cases for consistency. Something like this should do the trick: ``` diff diff --git i/prelude.rb w/prelude.rb index f49cada637..11bfa3fc95 100644 --- i/prelude.rb +++ w/prelude.rb @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ module Enumerable # Makes a set from the enumerable object with given arguments. # Passing arguments to this method is deprecated. def to_set(*args, &block) + if self.class == Range && self.end.nil? + raise RangeError, "cannot convert endless range to a set" + end + klass = if args.empty? Set else diff --git i/test/ruby/test_range.rb w/test/ruby/test_range.rb index f875c0ab40..27b968641b 100644 --- i/test/ruby/test_range.rb +++ w/test/ruby/test_range.rb @@ -1541,4 +1541,11 @@ def test_overlap? assert_not_operator((1...3), :overlap?, (3..4)) assert_not_operator((...3), :overlap?, (3..)) end + + def test_to_set + assert_equal(Set[], (1..-1).to_set) + assert_equal(Set[1, 2, 3], (1..3).to_set) + + assert_raise(RangeError) { (239..).to_set } + end end ``` If this patch is accepted, I'll open a PR. ``` shell ./ruby -v ruby 3.5.0dev (2025-07-14T20:34:32Z master a6d483971a) +PRISM [x86_64-linux] ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 7

[ruby-core:122343] [Ruby Misc#21385] Namespace: Suggesting a rename
by fxn (Xavier Noria) 11 Nov '25

11 Nov '25

Issue #21385 has been reported by fxn (Xavier Noria). ---------------------------------------- Misc #21385: Namespace: Suggesting a rename https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21385 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I'd like to suggest a rename of namespaces. The word "namespace" is already taken in Ruby. We say that classes and modules act as or represent. Constant paths nest them in practice. We say that it is a best practice that gems create their own namespace, etc. If the feature goes ahead with this name, the above sentences, well-established in the Ruby community, will start to sound confusing, because that meaning of "namespace" stays. If you look at the index in Matz's book, "namespaces" is indexed in pages 248–250. Title of section 7.5.1 is "Modules as Namespaces". Besides, I have had a few experiences explaining the proposal to people, and quickly realizing they assume this is something like C++ namespaces or Java packages. Then, I have to undo that mental model and start all over saying "forget that mental model". Those are like our constant paths, only more simple and strict. I think it may also be confusing in this sense (though this could be OK if it wasn't for the previous point.) To be constructive: Some alternative names that I have thought about are "isolates", "shields", or "cells". ("sandboxes" is close, but may have security connotations you do not want to suggest.) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

18 32

[ruby-core:122883] [Ruby Bug#21522] Accessing outer locals via eval in a Ractor returns false
by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 24 Oct '25

24 Oct '25

Issue #21522 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21522: Accessing outer locals via eval in a Ractor returns false https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21522 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Assignee: ractor * ruby -v: ruby 3.5.0dev (2025-07-28T22:17:45Z master f1acf47ca2) +PRISM [arm64-darwin24] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Normally, if you try to access a local that's been defined outside the scope of the Ractor block, it'll raise an ArgumentError. However, if you try to access the local via `eval` it will return the value `false`. ```ruby foo = Object.new begin Ractor.new { p foo }.value rescue ArgumentError end Ractor.new { p eval("foo") # => false }.value ``` I'm not sure how we fix this, since my guess is that we zero the environment when copying, but I wanted to file the issue so we can track it. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 1

[ruby-core:118243] [Ruby master Feature#20564] Switch default parser to Prism
by kddnewton (Kevin Newton) 22 Oct '25

22 Oct '25

Issue #20564 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20564: Switch default parser to Prism https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20564 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- This issue is to propose switching the default parser for Ruby to Prism on the master branch. The main goal is to get this default into both master and the next preview so that the community has plenty of time to test before the eventual 3.4 release. Matz has indicated that the final decision about the default parser for Ruby 3.4 will be made later in the year. Decisions about the default parser for Ruby 3.5+ and the relationship between Prism, lrama, parse.y, etc. will also be made at a later time. ## Background For some background on the Prism project itself, here are a couple of links in chronological order that you can read: * https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19741 * https://railsatscale.com/2023-06-12-rewriting-the-ruby-parser/ * https://kddnewton.com/2024/01/23/prism.html * https://railsatscale.com/2024-04-16-prism-in-2024/ ## Status Prism now passes all Ruby tests and specs. Internally at Shopify, it also passes our Core monolith's CI, which is a large and complex Rails application. We are confident that it is ready for production use. External to CRuby, Prism has already been adopted extensively around the ecosystem, including but not limited to: * [JRuby](https://github.com/jruby/jruby/pull/8103) (via Java) * [TruffleRuby](https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/3117) (via Java) * [Natalie](https://github.com/natalie-lang/natalie/pull/1213) (via C++ and Ruby) * [Opal](https://github.com/opal/opal/pull/2642) (via Ruby and WASM) * [repl_type_completor](https://github.com/ruby/repl_type_completor) * [rubocop](https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop/configuration.html#setting-the-pa… (via parser translator) * [ruby-lsp](https://github.com/Shopify/ruby-lsp) * [packwerk](https://github.com/Shopify/packwerk/pull/388) (via parser translator) Fortunately with the community adoption, we have been able to find many edge cases and bugs that have been fixed. Thank you so much to everyone who has tried, used, reported problems with, and improved Prism in the last couple of years. We would not have hit this milestone without this community involvement. ## Caveats While Prism correctly accepts and parses all valid Ruby syntax, there are still a number of cases where it does not reject invalid syntax as it should. We are currently working on these cases, and we are confident that we can eliminate them before the next preview release. You can find them listed here: https://github.com/ruby/prism/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Ainvalid…. This is our top priority right now, and I anticipate these being resolved quickly. The other caveat is unknown unknowns: bugs or syntax issues that we have yet to discover. At Shopify we are currently taking numerous steps to mitigate this risk, including: * Prism currently passes all Ruby tests and specs, and will continue to going forward. The tests and specs are extensive, and we are confident this gets us almost all of the way there. * Grammar-based fuzzing to ensure we handle all possible syntax variations (both valid and invalid). As an example, that recently led to the discovery that the current compiler was segfaulting on safe navigation in for loops (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20468) It has also found several memory leaks that have been fixed. * Mutation testing of existing source files (by adding and deleting random bytes) to find additional edge cases. Our goal is 100% compatibility, and we believe this is achievable through the above techniques and others. The goal of this proposal is to allow more companies to test their codebase against Prism, and to make this easier. We believe that we can sort out the remaining problems much more quickly in that manner. ## Implementation The implementation will be relatively straightforward, as there is already the `--parser` flag that can be used to switch between the current parser and Prism. We will change the default to be `"prism"` instead of `"parse.y"`. There is no plan to remove or change any code related to `parse.y`, `lrama`, or `compile.c` at this time, as we want to create the minimal amount of change possible to ensure stability. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 10

[ruby-core:111742] [Ruby master Feature#19326] Please add a better API for passing a Proc to a Ractor
by sdwolfz 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

Issue #19326 has been reported by sdwolfz (Codruț Gușoi). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19326: Please add a better API for passing a Proc to a Ractor https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19326 * Author: sdwolfz (Codruț Gușoi) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Example 1: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = block end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Worker.new { 1 } puts worker.run.take ``` Errors with: ``` <internal:ractor>:271:in `new': allocator undefined for Proc (TypeError) from scripts/run.rb:9:in `run' from scripts/run.rb:14:in `<main>' ``` Example 2: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = Ractor.make_shareable(block) end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Worker.new { 1 } puts worker.run.take ``` Errors with: ``` <internal:ractor>:820:in `make_shareable': Proc's self is not shareable: #<Proc:0x00007f00394c38b8 scripts/run.rb:13> (Ractor::IsolationError) from scripts/run.rb:5:in `initialize' from scripts/run.rb:13:in `new' from scripts/run.rb:13:in `<main>' ``` Example 3: ```ruby class Worker def initialize(&block) @block = Ractor.make_shareable(block) end def run Ractor.new(@block, &:call) end end worker = Ractor.current.instance_eval { Worker.new { 1 } } puts worker.run.take ``` Works, but having `Ractor.current.instance_eval` as a wrapper around the block is not ideal, as Ractor is supposed to be only an implementation detail in Worker. I know about https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18243 and the discussion around `proc.bind(nil)`. That would actually be ideal, as for the purposes if why I want this functionality I don't care what `self` is in a block, and the less it has access to the better. The general idea is to have a Ractor be able to lazily execute an arbitrary proc. And all the bindings it would need would be passed explicitly, either through `args` in the constructor or through `send`/`receive`, so `self` would really not matter. The benefit: this would make it so concurrent code can be more easily be implemented with Ractors as currently you can execute an arbitrary proc by passing it to a Thread (but you don't get the nice data isolation). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 12