March 2026 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:125003] [Ruby Feature#21953] Allow accessing unshareable objects within a Ractor-local Ruby Box
by tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube) 09 May '26

09 May '26

Issue #21953 has been reported by tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21953: Allow accessing unshareable objects within a Ractor-local Ruby Box https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21953 * Author: tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- ### Status Currently, non-main ractors prohibit access to the following objects to prevent data races: * Global variables * Class variables * Unshareable class instance variables * Unshareable constants ### Proposal I would like to propose that allow reading/writing unshareable objects inside a Ruby Box created in a non-main ractor: ```ruby # lib/x.rb class X # can write unshareable objects XXX = "1" @@cvar = "1" @ivar = "1" class << self def cvar; @@cvar; end def ivar; @ivar; end end end # can read unshareable objects $LOAD_PATH # => returns $LOAD_PATH includes lib directory X.cvar # => "1" X.ivar # => "1" X::XXX # => "1" # main.rb Ractor.new do local_box = Ruby::Box.new local_box.eval <<~RUBY base_dir = File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__)) lib_dir = File.join(base_dir, "lib") # can write unshareable objects $LOAD_PATH.unshift(lib_dir) RUBY local_box.require("x") x = local_box::X.new end.join ``` Ruby Box can isolate global/class variables, class/module definitions from other boxes. A Ruby Box created inside a non-main ractor cannot be accessed from other ractor. If that is the case, wouldn’t it be fine to access unshareable objects inside that box? So I would like to propose that allow reading/writing unshareable objects inside a Ruby Box created in a non-main ractor. ### Background We are working on implementing a Ractor based parallel test runner for the test-unit gem. Ractor is a great for parallel processing. However, many existing libraries still rely on class variables or class instance variables for configuration. Ideally, we should reduce the use of class variables or class instance variables. Currently, we tried fixing several non-shareable objects, but we could not resolve all of them yet. We will continue working on this issue, but we are also exploring other approaches. This is the idea begind this proposal. I think the work needed to make objects shareable when running exisiting libraries with Ractor can be reduced. ### FAQ Q: Can we create a Ruby Box inside a non-main ractor? A: Yes: ```ruby Ractor.new {Ruby::Box.new}.join ``` Q: Is a Ruby Box created in a non-main ractor truly inaccessible from other ractor? A: No. I'm not sure if it's intentional, but a Ruby Box is a shareable object. Also, it can be accessed from the main Ractor by using `Ractor#value`: ```ruby Ractor.shareable?(Ruby::Box.new) # => true ``` ```ruby Ractor.new {Ruby::Box.new}.value # => #<Ruby::Box:3,user,optional> ``` To implement this proposal, Ruby Box may need to be an unshareable object, and passing it with `Ractor#value` may need to be disallowed. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 8

[ruby-core:125150] [Ruby Bug#21970] Corrupted `ciobj->operands` in `compile.c: optimize_checktype`
by byroot (Jean Boussier) 04 May '26

04 May '26

Issue #21970 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21970: Corrupted `ciobj->operands` in `compile.c: optimize_checktype` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21970 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 4.0.2 (2026-03-17 revision d3da9fec82) +PRISM [aarch64-linux] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- A rare crash I observed in production. I unfortunately don't have a reproduction, but perhaps this will ring a bell to someone. ``` #4 0x0000aaaac9afb1b8 [PAC] in sigsegv (sig=11, info=0xaaaaff573e30, ctx=0xaaaaff573eb0) at signal.c:948 #5 <signal handler called> #6 0x0000aaaac9ddcb60 in get_next_insn (iobj=0xffffffff00000001) at compile.c:3078 #7 optimize_checktype (iobj=0xaaab00000640, iseq=0xffff6e41ac80) at compile.c:3291 #8 iseq_peephole_optimize (iseq=iseq@entry=0xffff6e41ac80, list=list@entry=0xaaab00000640, do_tailcallopt=do_tailcallopt@entry=0) at compile.c:3363 #9 0x0000aaaac9dde590 [PAC] in iseq_optimize (anchor=<optimized out>, iseq=<optimized out>) at compile.c:4453 #10 iseq_setup_insn (anchor=<optimized out>, iseq=<optimized out>) at compile.c:1648 #11 iseq_setup_insn (iseq=0xffff6e41ac80, anchor=0xffffdb42d078) at compile.c:1637 #12 0x0000aaaac9e22d34 [PAC] in pm_iseq_compile_node (iseq=0xffff6e41ac80, node=<optimized out>) at /ruby-4.0.2/prism_compile.c:10514 #13 0x0000aaaac9a32f08 [PAC] in pm_iseq_new_with_opt_try (d=d@entry=281474360333120) at iseq.c:1106 #14 0x0000aaaac99c81bc [PAC] in rb_protect (proc=proc@entry=0xaaaac9a32eec <pm_iseq_new_with_opt_try>, data=data@entry=281474360333120, pstate=pstate@entry=0xffffdb42d3e4) at eval.c:1127 #15 0x0000aaaac9a39408 [PAC] in pm_iseq_new_with_opt (node=node@entry=0xffffdb42d510, name=name@entry=281472546599520, path=path@entry=281472531544280, realpath=281472531544280, first_lineno=first_lineno@entry=215, parent=parent@entry=0x0, isolated_depth=isolated_depth@entry=0, type=type@entry=ISEQ_TYPE_METHOD, option=0xffffdb42d328, error_state=error_state@entry=0xffffdb42d3e4) at iseq.c:1159 #16 0x0000aaaac9dcf1fc [PAC] in pm_new_child_iseq (iseq=iseq@entry=0xffff6e41b068, node=node@entry=0xffffdb42d510, name=281472546599520, parent=parent@entry=0x0, type=type@entry=ISEQ_TYPE_METHOD, line_no=215) at /ruby-4.0.2/iseq.h:154 #17 0x0000aaaac9e0688c [PAC] in pm_compile_node (iseq=iseq@entry=0xffff6e41b068, node=0xaaab000f0ac0, ret=ret@entry=0xffffdb42dcd8, popped=popped@entry=true, scope_node=scope_node@entry=0xffffdb42e170) at /ruby-4.0.2/prism_compile.c:9073 #18 0x0000aaaac9e0bd7c [PAC] in pm_compile_node (iseq=iseq@entry=0xffff6e41b068, node=0xaaab000eeed0, ret=ret@entry=0xffffdb42dcd8, popped=popped@entry=false, scope_node=scope_node@entry=0xffffdb42e170) at /ruby-4.0.2/prism_compile.c:10327 #19 0x0000aaaac9e1ee4c [PAC] in pm_compile_scope_node (iseq=iseq@entry=0xffff6e41b068, scope_node=scope_node@entry=0xffffdb42e170, ret=ret@entry=0xffffdb42dcd8, popped=popped@entry=false, node_location=<optimized out>, node_location=<optimized out>) at /ruby-4.0.2/prism_compile.c:7047 ``` ``` (gdb) f 7 #7 optimize_checktype (iobj=0xaaab00000640, iseq=0xffff6e41ac80) at compile.c:3291 3291 ciobj = (INSN *)get_next_insn((INSN*)OPERAND_AT(ciobj, 0)); (gdb) p (INSN*)ciobj->operands[0] $7 = (INSN *) 0xffffffff00000001 (gdb) p *(INSN*)ciobj->operands[0] Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffff00000001 ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 3

[ruby-core:124714] [Ruby Bug#21870] Regexp: Warnings when using multiple non-overlapping \p{...} classes
by jneen (Jeanine Adkisson) 03 May '26

03 May '26

Issue #21870 has been reported by jneen (Jeanine Adkisson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21870: Regexp: Warnings when using multiple non-overlapping \p{...} classes https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21870 * Author: jneen (Jeanine Adkisson) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 4.0.0, 4.0.1, earlier versions to a lesser extent * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ```ruby $VERBOSE = true # warning: character class has duplicated range: /[\p{Word}\p{S}]/ regex = /[\p{Word}\p{S}]/ ``` As far as I can tell this is a perfectly valid and non-overlapping set of unicode properties, but I am still being spammed with warnings. Using `/(\p{Word}|\p{S})/` is kind of a workaround, but it is slower. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

9 22

[ruby-core:124655] [Ruby Bug#21856] Nokogiri performance degradation since Ruby 4.0
by ahorek 30 Apr '26

30 Apr '26

Issue #21856 has been reported by ahorek (Pavel Rosický). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21856: Nokogiri performance degradation since Ruby 4.0 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21856 * Author: ahorek (Pavel Rosický) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 4.1.0dev (2026-01-31T09:41:30Z master 7ef8c470d2) +PRISM [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Loofah sanitization is noticeably slower ``` Ruby: 3.4.8 Loofah: 2.25.0 Nokogiri: 1.19.0 Iterations: 100000 user system total real Loofah.fragment + scrub!(:prune) 26.091872 0.000000 26.091872 ( 25.110925) Loofah.scrub_fragment(:prune) 25.913185 0.010392 25.923577 ( 24.948464) Nokogiri HTML parse only 3.852690 0.000000 3.852690 ( 3.705930) Ruby: 4.0.0 & 4.0.1 Loofah: 2.25.0 Nokogiri: 1.19.0 Iterations: 100000 user system total real Loofah.fragment + scrub!(:prune) 38.094207 0.041753 38.135960 ( 36.669463) Loofah.scrub_fragment(:prune) 40.168795 0.000045 40.168840 ( 38.561806) Nokogiri HTML parse only 4.012936 0.052024 4.064960 ( 3.913272) Ruby: 4.1.0 (ruby 4.1.0dev (2026-01-31T09:41:30Z master 7ef8c470d2) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]) Loofah: 2.25.0 Nokogiri: 1.19.0 Iterations: 100000 user system total real Loofah.fragment + scrub!(:prune) 39.004228 0.000000 39.004228 ( 37.694873) Loofah.scrub_fragment(:prune) 39.043199 0.031284 39.074483 ( 37.182785) Nokogiri HTML parse only 3.889100 0.010427 3.899527 ( 3.741622) ``` Originally reported https://www.redmine.org/issues/43737 ---Files-------------------------------- benchmark.rb (1002 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

9 14

[ruby-core:124726] [Ruby Feature#21871] Add Module#undef_const
by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 29 Apr '26

29 Apr '26

Issue #21871 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21871: Add Module#undef_const https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21871 * Author: jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I propose to add `Module#undef_const`, which would operate for constants similarly to how `undef_method` (and the `undef` keyword) works for methods. When an undefed constant is found during constant lookup, lookup stops, and results in `const_missing` being called (similar to how `undef_method` stops method lookup and results in `method_missing` being called). The expected use for this is for stopping direct access to global constants inside namespaces. For example: ```ruby class DangerousClass; end class SafeClass undef_const :DangerousClass DangerousClass # NameError (const_missing behavior) end DangerousClass # no error ``` You cannot implement this behavior without introducing the equivalent of `Module#undef_const`. The best you can do is define a constant in the namespace that raises later when there is some access to the returned object. However, that approach has significant limitations, since you cannot raise on the lookup, only later when something operates on the returned object: ```ruby class DangerousClass; end class SafeClass DangerousClass = BasicObject.new DangerousClass.foo # NoMethodError DangerousClass::Constant # TypeError def m # doesn't raise, NoMethodError/TypeError occurs potentially much later in unrelated code [DangerousClass] end end ``` As to why it is good to stop direct access to a particular constants inside a namespace, it helps avoid IDOR (insecure direct object reference) security issues, since it pushes you to use a style like: ```ruby # Find a bar related to this foo bar = foo.bars.find { it.id == some_id } ``` As opposed to: ```ruby bar = Bar.find { it.id == some_id && it.foo.id == foo.id } ``` Assuming these are equivalent, the first approach is still better, because it avoids the possibility that a developer can write the following, missing the necessary check that the bar being accessed is related to the foo: ```ruby bar = Bar.find { it.id == some_id } ``` By using `undef_const :Bar` in the namespace, the `Bar.find` approach will not work, and developers will be pushed to use the `foo.bars.find` approach, which enforces safer behavior. I've submitted a pull request that implements this proposal: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/16116 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 4

[ruby-core:124311] [Ruby Feature#21795] Methods for retrieving ASTs
by kddnewton (Kevin Newton) 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

Issue #21795 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21795: Methods for retrieving ASTs https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21795 * Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I would like to propose a handful of methods for retrieving ASTs from various objects that correspond to locations in code. This includes: * Proc#ast * Method#ast * UnboundMethod#ast * Thread::Backtrace::Location#ast * TracePoint#ast (on call/return events) The purpose of this is to make tooling easier to write and maintain. Specifically, this would be able to be used in irb, power_assert, error_highlight, and various other tools both in core and not that make use of source code. There have been many previous discussions of retrieving node_id, source_location, source, etc. All of these use cases are covered by returning the AST for some entity. In this case node_id becomes an implementation detail, invisible to the user. Source location can be derived from the information on the AST itself. Similarly, source can be derived from the AST. Internally, I do not think we have to store any more information than we already do (since we have node_id for the first four of these, it becomes rather trivial). For TracePoint we can have a larger discussion about it, but I think it should not be too much work. In terms of implementation, the only caveat I would put is that if the ISEQ were compiled through the old parser/compiler, this should return `nil`, as the node ids do not match up and we do not want to further propagate the RubyVM::AST API. The reason I am opening up this ticket with 5 different methods requested in it is to get approval first for the direction, then I can open individual tickets or just PRs for each method. I believe this feature would ease the maintenance burden of many core libraries, and unify otherwise disparate efforts to achieve the same thing. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 21

[ruby-core:125114] [Ruby Feature#21962] Add deep_freeze for recursive freezing
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Issue #21962 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21962: Add deep_freeze for recursive freezing https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21962 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- ### Motivation It is common to want some data structure to be immutable, e.g. to ensure it doesn't get mutated by multiple threads. See the first section of #21665 for a more detailed motivation, the summary is there is long-standing demand for it (back to #17145) for many reasons. One way/workaround to do this currently is `Ractor.make_shareable` but its name suggests a Ractor-specific purpose. The functionality of deeply freezing is separate from Ractor and it is generally useful. `Ractor.make_shareable` almost has the right semantics and has been used for years so this proposal largely follows its semantics rather than reinventing the wheel. The semantics also match the `ice_nine` gem, which further illustrates these semantics work well in practice and are expected. ### Examples It freezes deeply: ```ruby config = { db: { host: ENV["HOST"], ports: [5432] }, flags: [:a, :b] }.deep_freeze config.frozen? # => true config[:db].frozen? # => true config[:db][:host].frozen? # => true config[:db][:ports].frozen? # => true ``` Modules and classes are not frozen by `deep_freeze`: ```ruby String.deep_freeze String.frozen? # => false ``` It works for cyclic references: ```ruby a = [] a << a a.deep_freeze a.frozen? # => true ``` It calls `.freeze` on each object: ```ruby class Stats def initialize(samples) @samples = samples @mean = nil end def mean @mean ||= @samples.sum / @samples.size.to_f end def freeze mean super end end s = Stats.new([1.0, 2.0, 3.0]) s.deep_freeze s.mean # => 2.0, would raise FrozenError instead if overridden #freeze was not called ``` ### Background #21665 relaunched the discussion about `deep_freeze` and it was [discussed in a dev meeting](https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2025/DevMeetin…. @headius has said he won't have time to look at it soon. So I am proposing something concrete which hopefully can be approved as-is. ### Design * Proposed: `Kernel#deep_freeze`. Alternative: `Object.deep_freeze`. * `Kernel#deep_freeze` is consistent with `Kernel#freeze`. * `[a, b, c].deep_freeze` is nicer, more concise and more idiomatic than `Object.deep_freeze([a, b, c])`. * The proposal focuses on semantics; the exact method name and owner can be decided separately. * The return value is the receiver. * `deep_freeze` never freezes modules and classes and does not visit their internal references * Same as `Ractor.make_shareable` and `IceNine.deep_freeze` * No unexpected breakage because a class, its ancestors, their constants, etc all got frozen. * Very easy to explain in the documentation. * If people want to freeze classes/modules (rare case) they can with `.freeze` and have control and can decide whether to freeze the ancestors, constants, class variables, etc. * `deep_freeze` calls `freeze` and ensures every object is frozen * Same as `Ractor.make_shareable` and `IceNine.deep_freeze` * The already well-known hook to e.g. compute lazy caches eagerly, etc * We still check that `.freeze` did freeze the object, and raise a `RuntimeError` if not (same behavior and error message as `Ractor.make_shareable`). * Not a protocol of defining `deep_freeze` in many classes. * That does not work with circular references. * No need to invent a complex protocol when there is an existing working one (calling `.freeze`) which has proven to work well (by being used by `Ractor.make_shareable`). * Handling circular references by maintaining internally a set of visited objects to avoid walking circular references multiple times * As done in `obj_traverse_i` in `ractor.c`. * No expectation for calling `deep_freeze` repeatedly on the same object to be fast * An object flag wouldn't work for this, for the case that `freeze` raises an exception. * If some `freeze` method raises an exception, the exception is propagated. * Same as `Ractor.make_shareable` and `IceNine.deep_freeze` * Some objects visited before the exception may already be frozen, same as `Ractor.make_shareable` (unavoidable because we need to call `freeze` as we traverse the object graph). * `deep_freeze` does not stop at already-frozen objects, because they may still reference unfrozen objects. * No special treatment for shareable objects, they are frozen too. I think this addresses all the points mentioned in the [dev meeting discussion](https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2025/DevMee… and in #21665 and in #17145. The traversal and freezing behavior closely follows `Ractor.make_shareable`, without introducing new semantics. ### Implementation The implementation in CRuby would be shared with `Ractor.make_shareable`, `ractor.c` already provides `rb_obj_traverse()` which is a great fit to implement this. From a high-level view the implementation works like this: `deep_freeze` recursively traverses the reachable object graph from the receiver. For each visited object: * If it is a `Class` or `Module`, it is not frozen and its internal references are not traversed. * Otherwise, Ruby calls `.freeze` on the object. * After calling `freeze`, Ruby verifies that the object is frozen. If it is not frozen, an exception is raised (same behavior and error message as `Ractor.make_shareable`). * The traversal keeps a visited set to avoid infinite recursion on cycles. ### Non-goals This proposal is focused on defining `deep_freeze` and nothing else: * This proposal does not define a new protocol requiring classes to implement custom recursive logic. * This proposal does not change `Ractor.make_shareable`. * This proposal does not freeze classes or modules. * This proposal does not attempt to define immutability as a broader language concept. ### Compatibility and risk * The proposal adds a new API and does not change existing `freeze` behavior. * It intentionally reuses existing `freeze` overrides on user objects. * It intentionally does not freeze classes/modules to avoid surprising breakage. * Its semantics are close to existing `Ractor.make_shareable`, reducing implementation risk. ### Relation to existing methods * `freeze`: freezes only the receiver (shallow). * `deep_freeze`: recursively freezes reachable objects. * `Ractor.make_shareable`: recursively freezes reachable objects except if they are already shareable. Special handling to make some objects shareable. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 5

[ruby-core:124864] [Ruby Misc#21922] Permissions for committers for default/bundled/unbundled gems repositories
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Issue #21922 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Misc #21922: Permissions for committers for default/bundled/unbundled gems repositories https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21922 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I noticed recently that the team `ruby-committers` on GitHub no longer has write access to at least: * https://github.com/ruby/benchmark * https://github.com/ruby/cmath * https://github.com/ruby/curses * https://github.com/ruby/dbm * https://github.com/ruby/e2mmap * https://github.com/ruby/gdbm * https://github.com/ruby/getoptlong * https://github.com/ruby/iconv * https://github.com/ruby/mathn * https://github.com/ruby/mutex_m * https://github.com/ruby/net-ftp * https://github.com/ruby/net-pop * https://github.com/ruby/net-telnet * https://github.com/ruby/observer * https://github.com/ruby/pathname (marked as maintained by @akr but they don't reply on GitHub, there is also an unclear relation with core Pathname [which still hasn't been resolved](https://github.com/ruby/pathname/issues/66) and is causing warnings for months) * https://github.com/ruby/prime * https://github.com/ruby/pstore * https://github.com/ruby/readline * https://github.com/ruby/readline-ext * https://github.com/ruby/ruby2_keywords * https://github.com/ruby/scanf * https://github.com/ruby/sdbm * https://github.com/ruby/set * https://github.com/ruby/shell * https://github.com/ruby/syck * https://github.com/ruby/sync * https://github.com/ruby/thwait * https://github.com/ruby/tk * https://github.com/ruby/tracer * https://github.com/ruby/webrick * https://github.com/ruby/win32api * https://github.com/ruby/xmlrpc This list is from a couple cases I noticed myself + [all repos](https://github.com/orgs/ruby/repositories?q=mirror%3Afalse+fork%3Afa… - [those committers have access](https://github.com/orgs/ruby/teams/ruby-committers/repositories) - [repos with known maintainers](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/doc/maintainers.md)) I filtered manually so there could be some mistake(s), though I tried to check carefully. I am certain CRuby committers had access to some of these repositories (e.g. I merged PRs there), but not sure about all, some might already not have had write access for CRuby committers. It seems only the 4 owners of the Ruby GitHub organization have write access to these repositories. What motivated these changes? I believe it is valuable that all CRuby committers can merge to default/bundled/unbundled gems repositories *without active maintainers*, as it was before. There is [this list](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/doc/maintainers.md) to define maintainers, though it's a little bit outdated and inaccurate. It's fine enough for this issue though. (A better definition IMO for active maintainers would be maintainers would actually respond to PRs and issues on GitHub to these repositories otherwise they are effectively not maintaining that repository, at least from an external perspective.) IOW it seems unreasonable to always have to ask one of the 4 owners of the Ruby GitHub organization to merge a PR to such repositories, as it would be a significant overhead for committers and for owners, and it would delay merging PRs significantly. I'm thinking for example to * documentation PRs ([many for pathname](https://github.com/ruby/pathname/pulls)) which really shouldn't need an owner to merge * PRs to improve/fix the CI ([example](https://github.com/ruby/readline-ext/pull/29)) * PRs fixing compatibility with recent changes in ruby's master branch * etc. Yet another way to see this is many default/bundled/unbundled gems do not have active maintainers. AFAIK so far in such cases then all CRuby committers could help, but this seems no longer the case. (FWIW I saw there a `default-gems-contributor` team with 3 people, which explains why they can merge PRs to some repositories that ruby committers can't for example.) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 14

[ruby-core:125117] [Ruby Feature#21963] A solution to completely avoid allocated-but-uninitialized objects
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Issue #21963 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21963: A solution to completely avoid allocated-but-uninitialized objects https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21963 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- A common issue when defining a class is to handle allocated-but-uninitialized objects. For example: ```ruby obj = MyClass.allocate obj.some_method ``` This can easily segfault for classes defined in C and raise an unclear exception for classes defined in Ruby. As a workaround many core (and non-core) classes add a check that they are initialized in *every* instance method. This is suboptimal for performance and correctness, classes should not need to care about allocated-but-uninitialized objects. Fundamentally, to solve this we need to guarantee that after the allocation function is used that either `initialize`, `initialize_dup` or `initialize_clone` is called. And we can't guarantee that for `Class#allocate`. The current workarounds are: * `undef allocate`, but this does not prevent `Class.instance_method(:allocate).bind_call(Foo)`. * `rb_undef_alloc_func()` but this breaks `dup`, `clone` and `Marshal`. The idea is to have in addition of the `public alloc function` (in `rb_classext_struct.as.class.allocator`) an `internal alloc function`. Then: * `Class#new`, `dup`, `clone` and `Marshal` always use the internal alloc function, because they guarantee to call `initialize`, `initialize_dup` or `initialize_clone`. * `rb_define_alloc_func()` sets both fields. * `rb_undef_alloc_func()` sets both fields. * `rb_get_alloc_func()` reads the public alloc function (unchanged) * `Class#allocate` uses the public alloc function (unchanged) We add a new method on `Class`, for example `Class#safe_initialization`, which: * Sets the public alloc function to `UNDEF_ALLOC_FUNC`, same as `rb_undef_alloc_func()`, so `Class#allocate` and `rb_get_alloc_func()` will raise if they are used (as they are unsafe). * Preserves the internal alloc function so `Class#new`, `dup`, `clone` and `Marshal` keep working. After that the class has fully safe intialization and does not need to worry about allocated-but-uninitialized objects anymore. From https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21852#note-7 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 9

[ruby-core:124955] [Ruby Misc#21948] benchmark gem maintainer
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Issue #21948 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Misc #21948: benchmark gem maintainer https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21948 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I would like to propose myself as maintainer of [benchmark](https://github.com/ruby/benchmark). I always had an interest about the `benchmark` stdlib and did significant contributions to it, notably [979ec8d](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/979ec8df5daf6db314b2f17e53b53d…. @matz approved it [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15424#issuecomment-3640875676), so this issue is mostly for awareness. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 2