March 2026 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:112045] [Ruby master Bug#19378] Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems
by aidog (Andi Idogawa) 27 Jul '26

27 Jul '26

Issue #19378 has been reported by aidog (Andi Idogawa). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19378: Windows: Use less syscalls for faster require of big gems https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19378 * Author: aidog (Andi Idogawa) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.2.0 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hello 🙂 ## Problem require is slow on windows for big gems. (example: require 'gtk3'=> 3 seconds+). This is a problem for people who want to make cross platform GUI apps with ruby. ## Possible Reason As touched on in [#15797](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15797) it seems like require uses realpath, which is emulated on windows. It checks every parent directory. The same syscalls run many times. ## Testfile C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb: ``` ruby require __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" require __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` shell ruby --disable-gems C:\tmp\speedtest\testrequire.rb ``` ### Syscalls per File/Directory: 1. CreateFile 2. QueryInformationVolume 3. QueryIdInformation 4. QueryAllInformationFile 5. QueryNameInformationFile 6. QueryNameInformationFile 7. QueryNormalizedNameInformationFile 8. CloseFile ### Files/Directories checked 1. C:\tmp 2. C:\tmp\speedtest 3. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld1.rb 4. C:\tmp 5. C:\tmp\speedtest 6. C:\tmp\speedtest\helloworld2.rb For two required files Ruby had to do 8*6 = **48** syscalls. The syscalls orginate from rb_w32_reparse_symlink_p / lstat Rubygems live in subfolders with 9+ parts: "C:\Ruby32-x64\lib\ruby\gems\3.2.0\gems\glib2-4.0.8\lib\glib2\variant.rb" Each file takes 8 * 9 = **72**+ calls. For variant.rb it is **80** calls. The result for the syscalls don't change in such a short time, so it should be possible to cache it. With require_relative it's twice as many calls. ## Other testcases Same result: ``` ruby File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.realpath __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` ``` ruby File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb" File.stat __dir__ + "/helloworld2.rb" ``` It does not happen in $LOAD_PATH.resolve_feature_path(__dir__ + "/helloworld1.rb") ## Request Would it be possible to cache the stat calls when using require? I tried to implement a cache inside the ruby source code, but failed. If not, is there now a way to combine ruby files into one? I previously talked about require here: [YJIT: Windows support lacking.](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19325#note-11) ## How to reproduce Ruby versions: At least 3.0+, most likely older ones too. Tested using Ruby Installer 3.1 and 3.2. [Procmon Software by Sysinternals](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/proc… -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 9

[ruby-core:124616] [Ruby Bug#21848] GC compaction freezes during code reload with 100% CPU in rb_vm_ci_free -> st_general_delete
by henrik (Henrik A) 27 Jul '26

27 Jul '26

Issue #21848 has been reported by henrik (Henrik A). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21848: GC compaction freezes during code reload with 100% CPU in rb_vm_ci_free -> st_general_delete https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21848 * Author: henrik (Henrik A) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 4.0.1 (2026-01-13 revision e04267a14b) +PRISM [arm64-darwin24] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Ruby 4.0.1 freezes with 100% CPU usage when garbage collection runs during Rails code reloading (hot reload in development). The process becomes unresponsive and requires kill -9 to terminate. Environment: - Ruby: 4.0.1 (Homebrew, ARM64) - Platform: macOS 15.6.1 (Darwin 24.6.0, Apple Silicon) - Rails: 8.x with Puma 7.2.0 - Mode: Development with code reloading enabled Steps to reproduce: 1. Run a Rails application with Puma in development mode (bundle exec rails server -e development -b 0.0.0.0) 2. Make a several code change to trigger hot reload, reload the site in the browser in between 3. Process freezes with ~100% CPU Expected behavior: Code reloads successfully, GC completes normally. Actual behavior: Process freezes indefinitely at 100% CPU. Stack trace from sample shows GC stuck in hash table lookup while freeing VM call info: ``` gc_sweep (in libruby.4.0.dylib) gc_compact_plane gc_sweep_page gc_sweep_plane rb_gc_obj_free_vm_weak_references rb_vm_ci_free st_general_delete find_table_bin_ind vm_ci_hash_cmp <-- stuck here, spinning ``` Full relevant stack (Puma worker thread): ``` Thread: puma srv tp 005 rb_ary_each -> rb_yield -> invoke_block_from_c_bh -> rb_vm_exec -> int_upto -> rb_yield (nested loops) -> vm_search_method_slowpath0 -> rb_vm_search_method_slowpath -> newobj_of -> newobj_cache_miss -> gc_continue -> gc_sweep -> gc_compact_plane -> gc_sweep_page -> gc_sweep_plane -> rb_gc_obj_free_vm_weak_references -> rb_vm_ci_free -> st_general_delete -> find_table_bin_ind -> vm_ci_hash_cmp ``` Workaround: Disabling auto-compaction prevents the freeze: GC.auto_compact = false Analysis: The freeze occurs during GC sweep/compaction when freeing cached VM call info entries (rb_vm_ci_free). This is triggered by code reloading which invalidates method caches. The GC appears to get stuck in an infinite loop or extremely slow operation in find_table_bin_ind while looking up entries in the call info hash table. ---Files-------------------------------- rails_stuck.txt (159 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:116456] [Ruby master Feature#20215] Introduce `IO#readable?`
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 25 Jul '26

25 Jul '26

Issue #20215 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20215: Introduce `IO#readable?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20215 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- There are some cases where, as an optimisation, it's useful to know whether more data is potentially available. We already have `IO#eof?` but the problem with using `IO#eof?` is that it can block indefinitely for sockets. Therefore, code which uses `IO#eof?` to determine if there is potentially more data, may hang. ```ruby def make_request(path = "/") client = connect_remote_host # HTTP/1.0 request: client.write("GET #{path} HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n") # Read response client.gets("\r\n") # => "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n" # Assuming connection close, there are two things the server can do: # 1. peer.close # 2. peer.write(...); peer.close if client.eof? # <--- Can hang here! puts "Connection closed" # Avoid yielding as we know there definitely won't be any data. else puts "Connection open, data may be available..." # There might be data available, so yield. yield(client) end ensure client&.close end make_request do |client| puts client.read # <--- Prefer to wait here. end ``` The proposed `IO#readable?` is similar to `IO#eof?` but rather than blocking, would simply return false. The expectation is the user will subsequently call `read` which may then wait. The proposed implementation would look something like this: ```ruby class IO def readable? !!self.closed? end end class BasicSocket # Is it likely that the socket is still connected? # May return false positive, but won't return false negative. def readable? return false unless super # If we can wait for the socket to become readable, we know that the socket may still be open. result = self.recv_nonblock(1, MSG_PEEK, exception: false) # No data was available - newer Ruby can return nil instead of empty string: return false if result.nil? # Either there was some data available, or we can wait to see if there is data avaialble. return !result.empty? || result == :wait_readable rescue Errno::ECONNRESET # This might be thrown by recv_nonblock. return false end end ``` For `IO` itself, when there is buffered data, `readable?` would also return true immediately, similar to `eof?`. This is not shown in the above implementation as I'm not sure if there is any Ruby method which exposes "there is buffered data". -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

8 19

[ruby-core:115018] [Ruby master Bug#19922] ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV
by wanabe (_ wanabe) 20 Jul '26

20 Jul '26

Issue #19922 has been reported by wanabe (_ wanabe). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19922: ObjectSpace.dump_all in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19922 * Author: wanabe (_ wanabe) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `ObjectSpace.dump_all` in multiple threads in parallel causes SEGV. The reproduce code is here: ``` $ ruby -robjspace -e 'def dump; 10.times { ObjectSpace.dump_all } end; Thread.new { dump }; dump' /home/wanabe/.rbenv/versions/master/lib/ruby/3.3.0+0/objspace.rb:100: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 (snip) ``` I attached the full log. I assumed that: - Thread1 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd1 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread2 - calls `rb_objspace_reachable_objects_from_root()` - changes `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 - calls `dump_flush()` - changes current thread due to IO - Thread1 - gets unexpected `GET_RACTOR()->mfd`: mfd2 ---Files-------------------------------- bug.log (23.1 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 5

[ruby-core:125045] [Ruby Bug#21955] `Fiber#transfer`: machine stack not released when fiber terminates, causing `FiberError: can't set a guard page`
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

Issue #21955 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21955: `Fiber#transfer`: machine stack not released when fiber terminates, causing `FiberError: can't set a guard page` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21955 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Backport: 3.2: REQUIRED, 3.3: REQUIRED, 3.4: REQUIRED, 4.0: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- When a fiber terminates (falls off the end of its block, or raises an unhandled exception) after being reached via `Fiber#transfer`, its machine stack is **not** returned to the fiber pool. The stack is only freed when the `Fiber` object is eventually garbage collected. In production, where GC does not run continuously, terminated fibers accumulate unreleased stacks. Each stack allocation contains a guard page set with `mprotect(PROT_NONE)`, which splits a kernel VMA. On Linux this exhausts the per-process `vm.max_map_count` limit and raises: ``` FiberError: can't set a guard page: Cannot allocate memory ``` The symptom is confusing: the fibers are all dead (`alive? == false`), new fibers cannot be created, but GC has not run. ## Root cause In `cont.c`, `fiber_switch()`, the eager stack release after `fiber_store` returns is guarded by `resuming_fiber`: ```c // cont.c (affected versions) #ifndef COROUTINE_PTHREAD_CONTEXT if (resuming_fiber && FIBER_TERMINATED_P(fiber)) { RB_VM_LOCKING() { fiber_stack_release(fiber); } } #endif ``` `resuming_fiber` is only non-`NULL` when the switch was initiated by `Fiber#resume` (which passes `resuming_fiber = fiber`). `Fiber#transfer` passes `resuming_fiber = NULL`, so the condition is never true and the stack is silently leaked until GC. Additionally, `fiber_raise` on a suspended non-yielding (transferred) fiber calls `fiber_transfer_kw`, also passing `resuming_fiber = NULL`, so the same leak occurs when a transferred fiber is terminated by a raised exception. ## Reproduction Set a low map count limit, then run the attached script: ``` sudo bash -c "echo 10000 > /proc/sys/vm/max_map_count" ruby test_fiber_transfer_leak.rb ``` Restore afterwards (`sysctl vm.max_map_count` shows the default, typically 65530). ```ruby GC.disable leaked = [] count = 0 begin 10_000.times do f = Fiber.new { } # terminates immediately leaked << f # hold reference so Fiber object is not GC'd f.transfer # transfer, not resume => stack NOT released (bug) count += 1 puts "[#{count} fibers] all dead: #{leaked.none?(&:alive?)}" if count % 1000 == 0 end puts "No error — fix is applied." rescue FiberError => e puts "FiberError after #{count} fibers: #{e.message}" puts "All terminated (alive?=false): #{leaked.none?(&:alive?)}" ensure GC.enable leaked.clear GC.start end ``` Expected output on **unpatched** Ruby (vm.max_map_count=10000): ``` [1000 fibers] all dead: true [2000 fibers] all dead: true [3000 fibers] all dead: true [4000 fibers] all dead: true FiberError after 4096 fibers: can't set a guard page: Cannot allocate memory All terminated (alive?=false): false ``` Expected output on **patched** Ruby: ``` [1000 fibers] all dead: true ... [10000 fibers] all dead: true No error — fix is applied. ``` ## Fix Drop the `resuming_fiber &&` guard. After `fiber_store` returns we are executing in the caller's context — we are never on `fiber`'s stack — so releasing it is unconditionally safe. `fiber_stack_release` is already idempotent (guarded by `fiber->stack.base == NULL`), so the resume path is unaffected. ```c #ifndef COROUTINE_PTHREAD_CONTEXT if (FIBER_TERMINATED_P(fiber)) { RB_VM_LOCKING() { fiber_stack_release(fiber); } } #endif ``` Pull request with fix: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/16416 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 3

[ruby-core:113743] [Ruby master Feature#19708] Support `attr_reader :foo?`
by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

Issue #19708 has been reported by AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19708: Support `attr_reader :foo?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19708 * Author: AMomchilov (Alexander Momchilov) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Creating reader methods with `attr_reader` is preferable over defining them by hand, not only because it's more convenient, but also because it hits a fast path in MRI (see `VM_METHOD_TYPE_IVAR`). Since local and instance variables can't end with `?`, you can't use `attr_reader` to define predicate-style methods for boolean values, like: ```ruby class Person attr_reader(:name, :age, :active?) # invalid attribute name `active?' (NameError) def initialize @name = "Bob" @age = 30 @active = true end end ``` It would be nice if `attr_reader` (and friends) could behave like: ```ruby def active? = @active ``` (`attr_writer` and `attr_accessor` couldn't do the same, since `def active?=(new_value)` isn't valid, so they'd probably stick with `def active=(new_value)`) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 7

[ruby-core:116083] [Ruby master Feature#20163] Introduce #bit_count method on Integer
by garrison (Garrison Jensen) 10 Jul '26

10 Jul '26

Issue #20163 has been reported by garrison (Garrison Jensen). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20163: Introduce #bit_count method on Integer https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20163 * Author: garrison (Garrison Jensen) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- This feature request is to implement a method called #bit_count on Integer that returns the number of ones in the binary representation of the absolute value of the integer. ``` n = 19 n.bit_count #=> 3 (-n).bit_count #=> 3 ``` This is often useful when you use an integer as a bitmask and want to count how many bits are set. This would be equivalent to ``` n.to_s(2).count("1") ``` However, this can be outperformed by ``` def bit_count(n) count = 0 while n > 0 n &= n - 1 # Flip the least significant 1 bit to 0 count += 1 end count end ``` I think this would be a useful addition because it would fit alongside the other bit-related methods defined on integer: `#bit_length,` `#allbits?`, `#anybits?`, `#nobits?`. Also, when working with bitmasks, a minor upgrade to performance often results in a significant improvement. Similar methods from other languages: https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#int.bit_count https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i32.html#method.count_ones -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

14 32

[ruby-core:124984] [Ruby Bug#21951] Lazy load error enhancer gems to speed up boot time
by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 09 Jul '26

09 Jul '26

Issue #21951 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21951: Lazy load error enhancer gems to speed up boot time https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21951 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open * Assignee: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ## Summary I investigate https://github.com/ruby/rubygems/issues/3799 for speed up Ruby's boot time. It depends on the environment, but when gems are included in `GEM_HOME` and user installation. I and Claude found that the most time-consuming part is requiring the three gems related to error notification, rather than loading the gemspec of default gems. ## How it works Defer loading of `error_highlight`, `did_you_mean`, and `syntax_suggest` from boot time to first error display. These gems only enhance `Exception#detailed_message`, so they are not needed until an error is actually displayed. ## Performance `ruby -e1` boot time on Apple M1 Pro: | Configuration | With user gems | Default gems only | |---|---|---| | master | 114.3 ms | 38.3 ms | | This patch | 30.2 ms | 30.4 ms | | `--disable-did_you_mean --disable-error_highlight --disable-syntax_suggest` | 30.3 ms | 30.6 ms | With this patch, `ruby -e1` is as fast as disabling all three gems via flags. The error path has no measurable regression (+0.9 ms, within noise). ## Patch https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/16371 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 3

[ruby-core:123883] [Ruby Feature#21704] Expose rb_process_status_new to C extensions
by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) 09 Jul '26

09 Jul '26

Issue #21704 has been reported by noteflakes (Sharon Rosner). ---------------------------------------- Feature #21704: Expose rb_process_status_new to C extensions https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21704 * Author: noteflakes (Sharon Rosner) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- A fiber scheduler implementation with a hook for `#process_wait` needs to return a `Process::Status` object, but currently it is not possible for a C extension to directly create an instance of `Process::Status`. The technique currently used in various fiber scheduler implementations is to use `pidfd_open`, poll for fd readiness, then call `Process::Status.wait`, which creates the instance. On recent Linux kernels (6.7 or newer), `io_uring_prep_waitid` can be used to directly wait for process termination, which provides us with the pid and status of the terminated child process, but there's no way to directly create an instance of `Process::Status`, required for implementing the `#process_wait` hook. Exposing the internal `rb_process_status_new` function would allow such an implementation. Using `io_uring_prep_waitid` would also lead to better compatibility of fiber schedulers with calls to `Process.wait(0)` or `Process.wait(-1)`, as those cannot be done using `pidfd_open`. The associated PR is here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15213 An working fiber scheduler implementation of `process_wait` using `io_uring_prep_waitid` has been submitted here: https://github.com/socketry/io-event/pull/154 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 4

[ruby-core:124833] [Ruby Bug#21882] IO::Buffer#locked leaves the buffer locked when the block raises
by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki) 09 Jul '26

09 Jul '26

Issue #21882 has been reported by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki). ---------------------------------------- Bug #21882: IO::Buffer#locked leaves the buffer locked when the block raises https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21882 * Author: hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki) * Status: Open * ruby -v: ruby 4.0.1 (2026-01-13 revision e04267a14b) +PRISM [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN, 3.4: UNKNOWN, 4.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- `IO::Buffer#locked` should unlock the buffer even after the block raises an exception. ```ruby buf = IO::Buffer.new(100) buf.locked { fail } rescue nil buf.locked { p :ok } # expected to print :ok, but actually raises a LockedError ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 6