October 2023 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:112304] [Ruby master Bug#19427] Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases
by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) 16 May '24

16 May '24

Issue #19427 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19427: Marshal.load(source, freeze: true) doesn't freeze in some cases https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19427 * Author: andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.1 * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I've noticed that the `freeze` option doesn't work in the following cases: - when dumped object extends a module - when dumped object responds to `#marshal_dump` and `#marshal_load` methods - when dumped object responds to `#_dump` method Is it expected behaviour or a known issue? Examples: ```ruby module M end object = Object.new object.extend(M) object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(object), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserMarshal attr_accessor :data def initialize @data = 'stuff' end def marshal_dump() :data end def marshal_load(data) @data = data end end object = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(UserMarshal.new), freeze: true) object.frozen? # => false ``` ```ruby class UserDefined attr_reader :a, :b def initialize @a = 'stuff' @b = @a end def _dump(depth) Marshal.dump [:stuff, :stuff] end def self._load(data) a, b = Marshal.load data obj = allocate obj.instance_variable_set :@a, a obj.instance_variable_set :@b, b obj end end ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 13

[ruby-core:112873] [Ruby master Bug#19530] `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours
by dstosik (David Stosik) 16 May '24

16 May '24

Issue #19530 has been reported by dstosik (David Stosik). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19530: `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` sometimes show different behaviours https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19530 * Author: dstosik (David Stosik) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [arm64-darwin22] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi everyone. 👋🏻 We recently discovered that `Array#sum` and `Enumerable#sum` will output different results in some edge cases. Here's the smallest script I managed to write to reproduce the issue: ``` ruby class Money def initialize(amount) @amount = amount.to_f end def +(other) self.class.new(@amount + other.to_f) end def to_f @amount end end p [7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Money p [7.0] .sum(Money.new(0)).class #=> Float 💥 ``` I understand that it is expected that `#sum` may not honor custom definitions of the `#+` method (particularly when the summed values are `Float`). However, I would like to bring your attention to the fact that, in the example above, calling `#sum` on an `Array` of `Float` values and calling `#sum` on an `Enumerable` that yields the same `Float` values will return results of different types. I've reproduced the same behaviour with multiple versions of Ruby going from 2.6.5 to 3.2.1. Ideally, I would expect `[7.0].sum(Money.new(0))` to return a `Money` object identical to the one returned by `[7.0].each.sum(Money.new(0))`. I think it would make sense if at least they returned an identical value (even if it is a `Float`). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:114403] [Ruby master Feature#19840] [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find
by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley) 16 May '24

16 May '24

Issue #19840 has been reported by FlickGradley (Nick Bradley). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19840: [Proposal] Expand Find pattern to Multiple Find https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19840 * Author: FlickGradley (Nick Bradley) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Hello! I love Ruby's pattern matching features. I would like to propose an expansion of the Find pattern which allows the selection of multiple matching elements of an array. I often find myself dealing with data like this: ``` ruby { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }, ... ] } ``` My problem is that I need to retrieve all the `id` values from the nested array of hashes, and I don't know how many there will be in advance. It seems that the Find pattern could be expanded from allowing `pattern` (matching a single element) to `*pattern`. Examples: ``` ruby # Base case case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # With * at the end (rest of args) - same result case { results: [{ id: 1, name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }, *] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2] # When one element doesn't match and there is no *rest case { results: [{ name: "foo" }, { id: 2, name: "bar" }] } in results: [*{ id: ids }] "matched: #{ids}" else "not matched" end #=> not matched ``` Similarly, `*Constant` could work to pull out types with an As pattern: ``` ruby case [1, 2, 3, "string"] in *Integer => nums, * "matched: #{nums}" else "not matched" end #=> matched: [1, 2, 3] ``` Other patterns would work in the same way. Essentially, this expands the concept of `*` in pattern matching to mean "a variable number of `things matching subpattern`". Today, the only pattern supported by `*` is a variable binding - but it could be any of the other subpatterns as well. This proposal does imply that this would work: ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, 2, 3] in [*, *^a, *] #=> true ``` To me, the `*` represents the variable number of matches, so the syntax makes intuitive sense. But others may have different opinions about `*^` being adjacent. It may also imply this would work, though we could restrict the number of non-variable patterns (in other words, patterns that have the possibility of not matching) to 1 per Array so that this isn't possible.. I'm not sure something like this would be useful or clear. ``` ruby a = 2 [1, 2, "hello", "ruby"] in [*Integer, *String] #=> true ``` This feature feels like the missing piece of the Find pattern to me - I often want to "Find Multiple". If others agree, I would be happy to contribute by working on this feature and creating a pull request. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 2

[ruby-core:113195] [Ruby master Bug#19592] Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4
by npic1 (Nat Pic1) 07 Apr '24

07 Apr '24

Issue #19592 has been reported by npic1 (Nat Pic1). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19592: Unable to statically link a single extension in 3.2.x and >3.1.4 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19592 * Author: npic1 (Nat Pic1) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hi, I need to statically link a single extension (not all of them) by adding it to ext/Setup. This worked until version 3.1.4 and 3.2.x. It appears that this change broke it: [https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-master/repository/git/revisions/79… [https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6756](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6…. I have attached a script to reproduce the issue. When running the script, `ldd` fails with: ``` ext/extinit.o: in function `Init_ext': extinit.c:(.text+0x10): undefined reference to `ruby_init_ext' ``` ---Files-------------------------------- ruby_static_test.sh (1.57 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 2

[ruby-core:113782] [Ruby master Bug#19716] SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc)
by alexdowad (Alex Dowad) 27 Mar '24

27 Mar '24

Issue #19716 has been reported by alexdowad (Alex Dowad). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19716: SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19716 * Author: alexdowad (Alex Dowad) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.1.4p223 (2023-03-30 revision 957bb7cb81) [x86_64-linux-musl] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This is the same problem previously reported against Ruby 2.5 in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387. I just ran into the same problem on Ruby 3.1.4, built on Alpine Linux 3.16. @hsbt stated in the previous thread (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387#note-28) > If you have this issue with Ruby 3.2, please file it with another issue. I hacked `stack_check` in gc.c to print the values of `STACK_START` and `STACK_END` on stack overflow; on the Alpine 3.16 host where this problem just occurred, the values printed were: > Start=0x7ffd0bf4f000, End=0x7ffd0bf32530 ...which shows that Ruby thinks the stack size is only 131072 bytes. On the other hand, `ulimit -s` shows a stack size limit of 8192kb. This Ruby 3.1.4 was built from unmodified source code downloaded from https://cache.ruby-lang.org; the build was configured using `CFLAGS='-march=native' ./configure --disable-install-doc`. The invocation of Ruby which blew the stack was `bundle exec rake db:migrate`, on a mid-sized Rails project. Regarding @ncopa's patch from #14387, @wanabe listed some things which should be done before it is merged into mainline Ruby: > Okay, The patch needs one or more proofs of its behaviour, like that: > > Original issue [ruby-dev:50421] has gone away. > Standard test codes run well. > test-all > ruby/spec > getrlimit works on some situations like: > on single thread > with multiple threads > with RLIMIT_STACK environment variable > getrlimit code of musl is implemented correctly as expected. > (But It's doubtful whether it can be. I guess that a proof of code soundness is very difficult.) > Some "real world" applications can work. > I think it is better example that that application(s) can't work without the patch. I am happy to help cover some of these points if the Ruby development team is still interested in merging @ncopa's patch. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 5

[ruby-core:111075] [Ruby master Bug#19161] Cannot compile 3.0.5 or 3.1.3 on Red Hat 7
by werebus (Matt Moretti) 25 Mar '24

25 Mar '24

Issue #19161 has been reported by werebus (Matt Moretti). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19161: Cannot compile 3.0.5 or 3.1.3 on Red Hat 7 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19161 * Author: werebus (Matt Moretti) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When attempting to run `make` on either the 3.0.5 or 3.1.3 release, I get the following error (I included the whole output as it's pretty short): ``` BASERUBY = /opt/ruby/bin/ruby --disable=gems CC = gcc -std=gnu11 LD = ld LDSHARED = gcc -std=gnu11 -shared CFLAGS = -O3 -fno-fast-math -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeprecated-declarations -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wimplicit-int -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-cast-function-type -Wno-constant-logical-operand -Wno-long-long -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-self-assign -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-value -Wsuggest-attribute=format -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunused-variable XCFLAGS = -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-overflow -fvisibility=hidden -fexcess-precision=standard -DRUBY_EXPORT -fPIE -I. -I.ext/include/x86_64-linux -I./include -I. -I./enc/unicode/13.0.0 CPPFLAGS = DLDFLAGS = -Wl,--compress-debug-sections=zlib -fstack-protector-strong -pie SOLIBS = -lz -lpthread -lrt -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm LANG = en_US.UTF-8 LC_ALL = LC_CTYPE = MFLAGS = gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. compiling ./main.c compiling dmydln.c compiling miniinit.c In file included from vm_core.h:83:0, from iseq.h:14, from mini_builtin.c:3, from miniinit.c:51: thread_pthread.h:108:43: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘struct’ RUBY_EXTERN RB_THREAD_LOCAL_SPECIFIER struct rb_execution_context_struct *ruby_current_ec; ^ In file included from iseq.h:14:0, from mini_builtin.c:3, from miniinit.c:51: vm_core.h: In function ‘rb_current_execution_context’: vm_core.h:1870:34: error: ‘ruby_current_ec’ undeclared (first use in this function) rb_execution_context_t *ec = ruby_current_ec; ^ vm_core.h:1870:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in miniinit.c: At top level: cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-tautological-compare" [enabled by default] cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-self-assign" [enabled by default] cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-parentheses-equality" [enabled by default] cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-constant-logical-operand" [enabled by default] cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-cast-function-type" [enabled by default] make: *** [miniinit.o] Error 1 ``` Both Ruby 3.0.4 and 3.1.2 build without error and pass (all but one of) the `make check` tests. I know RHEL 7 is getting to be pretty old; I suspect a factor here are the ancient build tools available to me. But... EOL for Ruby 2.7 comes before the one for RHEL 7, so I'm trying to prioritize. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

10 14

[ruby-core:114309] [Ruby master Feature#19787] Add Enumerable#uniq_map, Enumerable::Lazy#uniq_map, Array#uniq_map and Array#uniq_map!
by joshuay03 (Joshua Young) 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Issue #19787 has been reported by joshuay03 (Joshua Young). ---------------------------------------- Feature #19787: Add Enumerable#uniq_map, Enumerable::Lazy#uniq_map, Array#uniq_map and Array#uniq_map! https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19787 * Author: joshuay03 (Joshua Young) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- I would like to propose a collection of new methods, `Enumerable#uniq_map`, `Enumerable::Lazy#uniq_map`, `Array#uniq_map` and `Array#uniq_map!`. TL;DR: It's a drop in replacement for `.map { ... }.uniq`, with better performance. I've quite often had to map over an array and get its unique elements. It occurred to me when doing so recently that Ruby doesn't have a short form method for doing that, similar to how `flat_map { ... }` replaces `.map { ... }.flatten` and `filter_map { ... }` replaces `.map { ... }.compact` (with minor differences). I think these new methods could be beneficial both in terms of better performance and writing more succinct code. I have already got a draft PR up with some initial benchmarks in the description: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/8140. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 6

[ruby-core:113966] [Ruby master Bug#19742] Introduce `Module#anonymous?`
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

Issue #19742 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19742: Introduce `Module#anonymous?` https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19742 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- As a follow-on <from https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19521>, I'd like propose we introduce `Module#anonymous?`. In some situations, like logging/formatting, serialisation/deserialization, debugging or meta-programming, we might like to know if a class is a proper constant or not. However, this brings about some other issues which might need to be discussed. After assigning a constant, then removing it, the internal state of Ruby still believes that the class name is permanent, even thought it's no longer true. e.g. ``` m = Module.new m.anonymous? # true M = m m.anonyomous # false Object.send(:remove_const, :M) M # uninitialized constant M (NameError) M.anonymous? # false ``` Because RCLASS data structure is not updated after the constant is removed, internally the state still has a "permanent class name". I want to use this proposal to discuss this issue and whether there is anything we should do about such behaviour (or even if it's desirable). Proposed PR: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7966 cc @fxn -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

9 46

[ruby-core:115169] [Ruby master Bug#19973] Duplicate keyword argument names don't always warn
by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 25 Feb '24

25 Feb '24

Issue #19973 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19973: Duplicate keyword argument names don't always warn https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19973 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0dev (2023-10-24T19:38:50Z cleanup 3525a9bd22) [arm64-darwin23] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Calling a method with duplicate keyword arguments doesn't warn when it could: ```ruby def bar a:, b: a + b end # Warning bar(a: 1, b: 3, a: 2) z = { b: 123 } # No warning bar(a: 1, **z, a: 2) ``` The first call to `bar` gives a warning about duplicate keyword args, but the second call doesn't. I think both cases should emit a warning. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:111965] [Ruby master Bug#19365] Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators
by luke-gru (Luke Gruber) 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

Issue #19365 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19365: Ractors can access non-shareable values through enumerators https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19365 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I don't think enumerators should be able to be passed to `Ractor.new` ```ruby obj = Object.new # unshareable value p obj Ractor.new([obj].each) {|f| p f.first }.take ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 3